Roshterian: Difference between revisions

IlL (talk | contribs)
IlL (talk | contribs)
Line 42: Line 42:
This sentence was likely written by a non-native speaker of Roshterian, seeing by the fact that he/she omitted evidentials, which would be required in the second clause.
This sentence was likely written by a non-native speaker of Roshterian, seeing by the fact that he/she omitted evidentials, which would be required in the second clause.


The significance of Roshterian for Talmic linguistics was first noted by the Xaetjeon linguist Sjameu Panzux - he noted that it reflected all four dorsal series of Proto-Talmic differently, unlike the (in western Cuadhlabh) hitherto known Thensaric languages:  
The significance of Roshterian for Talmic linguistics was first noted by the Xaetjeon linguist Sjameu Panzux - he proposed that it reflected all four dorsal series of Proto-Talmic differently, unlike the (in western Cuadhlabh) hitherto known Thensaric languages:  


*{{recon|''k, g''}} > ''c, g''  
*{{recon|''k, g''}} > Roshterian ''c, g'', Thensarian ''c, g''
*{{recon|''kʷ, gʷ''}} > ''p, b''
*{{recon|''kʷ, gʷ''}} > Rosh. ''p, b'', Thn. ''c, g''
*{{recon|''q, ɢ''}} > ''q, ḡ''
*{{recon|''q, ɢ''}} > Rosh. ''q, ḡ'', Thn. ''ȝ, ħ''
*{{recon|''qʷ, ɢʷ''}} > ''s̱, ṟ''
*{{recon|''qʷ, ɢʷ''}} > Rosh. ''s̱, ṟ'', Thn. ''ȝ, ħ''


==Todo==
==Todo==