Category:Borchennymendi singulare tantum nouns: Difference between revisions
EnricoGalea (talk | contribs) Created page with "Singulare tantum nouns can’t be plural through morphology, but not through syntax. Agreement-mismatched nouns can be singulare tantum if a word appears only in the singular but has plural meaning, thus interfering indirectly in the rest if the morphology. For example: Are the woods red? > ''bearhmhighr''iaidhanesh''em'' rhoeish:. {{term|bearhmhighr}} can’t receive the plural marker, but always has a plural meaning. This affects the pronominal suffix {{term|-es}} that..." |
EnricoGalea (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Singulare tantum nouns can’t be plural through morphology, but not through syntax. Agreement-mismatched nouns can be singulare tantum if a word appears only in the singular but has plural meaning, thus interfering indirectly in the rest if the morphology. For example: Are the woods red? > ''bearhmhighr''iaidhanesh''em'' rhoeish:. {{term|bearhmhighr}} can’t receive the plural marker, but always has a plural meaning. This affects the pronominal suffix {{term|-es}} that turns plural: {{term|-eshem}}. | Singulare tantum nouns can’t be plural through morphology, but not through syntax. Agreement-mismatched nouns can be singulare tantum if a word appears only in the singular but has plural meaning, thus interfering indirectly in the rest if the morphology. For example: Are the woods red? > ''bearhmhighr''iaidhanesh''em'' rhoeish:. {{term|bearhmhighr}} can’t receive the plural marker, but always has a plural meaning. This affects the pronominal suffix {{term|-es}} that turns plural: {{term|-eshem}}. | ||
[[Category:Borchennymendi nouns]] | [[Category:Borchennymendi nouns]] [[Category:Borchennymendi irregular nouns]] | ||