Aryan: Difference between revisions

Line 3,069:

|-

! Genitive

| *nya ~ *~~nana~~ || *~~twaya~~ ~ *~~twana~~ || X || *nóya ~ *nóna || *yúya ~*yúna || X || *nsya || *wsya || X

| *nya ~ *nna || *twya ~ *twna || X || *nóya ~ *nóna || *yúya ~*yúna || X || *nsya || *wsya || X

|-

! Dative

Line 3,076:

|}

*When inflected, lemmas are weakened

p

**If PIE ''*túH'' "you (sg.nom.)" and ''*twé'' "you (sg.acc.)" follow Aryan ''*tū́'' and ''*twh0'', the form ''*eǵh₂óm'' (which could yield the equivalent of ''*me'') becomes more archaic than ''*h₁eǵH'', as Homeric Greek ''ἐγών'' and Sanskrit ''अहम्'' suggest.

*The primordial form of ''*aiǵṓn'' (PIE ''*eǵh₂óm'') is ''ˈʕɨ̀ː-ɔː'' (Codex), which would regularly yield ''*aiṓ'', yet it is observed that in Aryan the consonant <''*ǵ''> is inserted, plus the affixation of <''*n''>, more securely assumed as a borrowing from Diluvian ''nao'' "I".

~~... when~~ inflected, ~~the~~ lemmas are weakened (e.g. *tū > *tw- "~~you~~") ...

*The nasal in ''*aiǵṓn'' "I" was subsequently labialized by the preceding vowel, shortening the nucleus (i.e. /ɔːn/ ⇒ /ɔwn/ ⇒ /ɔm/).

**This sound change affected all other inflections of the first person singular.

* The nasal in ''*aiǵṓn'' "I" was subsequently labialized by the preceding vowel, shortening the nucleus (i.e. /ɔːn/ ⇒ /ɔwn/ ⇒ /ɔm/).

** This sound change affected all other inflections of the first person singular.

*** e.g. the Aryan form ''*nh0'' "me" became ''*mh0'', then PIE ''*me''.

*The dual is formed by erasing sounds of the singular, then reduplicating it (e.g. ''*aiǵṓn'' ⇒ ''*ōyṓn''; ''*tū́'' ⇒ ''*ūyū́''), with medial ''*y'' inserted to avoid diphthongs.

** The products of this process would eventually substitute the plural forms (i.e. ''*ṓns'' "we (plural)" ⇒ ∅, replaced by ''*ōyṓn'' "we (dual)" (Aryan) ⇒ ''*wéy'' "we (plural)" (PIE); ''*ūs'' "you (plural)" ⇒ ∅, replaced by ''*ūyú'' "you (dual)" (Aryan) ⇒ ''yū́'' "you (plural)" (PIE)).

**The products of this process would eventually substitute the plural forms (i.e. ''*ṓns'' "we (plural)" ⇒ ∅, replaced by ''*ōyṓn'' "we (dual)" (Aryan) ⇒ ''*wéy'' "we (plural)" (PIE); ''*ūs'' "you (plural)" ⇒ ∅, replaced by ''*ūyú'' "you (dual)" (Aryan) ⇒ ''*yū́'' "you (plural)" (PIE)).

*The plural is formed by erasing the reduplication of the dual, then adding the serial particle *-s- (e.g. ''*ōyṓn'' ⇒ ''*ṓns''; ''*ūyū́'' ⇒ ''*ū́s''), with medial ''*y'' removed due the impossibility of diphthongs.

*~~twaya >~~ *~~tweye >~~ *~~tewe~~

~~''ˈʕɨ̀ː-ɔː'' (Codex) > ''*aiǵṓn'' (Aryan) > ''*eǵh₂óm'' (PIE)~~

~~Homeric Greek ''ἐγών'', Sanskrit ''अहम्'', Latin ''ego''~~

*twya > *tewye > *téwe (gen.)

===Verb===

@@ Line 3,069: / Line 3,069: @@
 |-
 ! Genitive
-| *nya ~ *nana || *twaya ~ *twana || X || *nóya ~ *nóna || *yúya ~*yúna || X || *nsya || *wsya || X
+| *nya ~ *nna || *twya ~ *twna || X || *nóya ~ *nóna || *yúya ~*yúna || X || *nsya || *wsya || X
 |-
 ! Dative
@@ Line 3,076: / Line 3,076: @@
 |}
+*When inflected, lemmas are weakened
-p
+**If PIE ''*túH'' "you (sg.nom.)" and ''*twé'' "you (sg.acc.)" follow Aryan ''*tū́'' and ''*twh<sub>0</sub>'', the form ''*eǵh₂óm'' (which could yield the equivalent of ''*me'') becomes more archaic than ''*h₁eǵH'', as Homeric Greek ''ἐγών'' and Sanskrit ''अहम्'' suggest.
+*The primordial form of ''*aiǵṓn'' (PIE ''*eǵh₂óm'') is ''ˈʕɨ̀ː-ɔː'' (Codex), which would regularly yield ''*aiṓ'', yet it is observed that in Aryan the consonant <''*ǵ''> is inserted, plus the affixation of <''*n''>, more securely assumed as a borrowing from Diluvian ''nao'' "I".
-... when inflected, the lemmas are weakened (e.g. *tū > *tw- "you") ...
+*The nasal in ''*aiǵṓn'' "I" was subsequently labialized by the preceding vowel, shortening the nucleus (i.e. /ɔːn/ ⇒ /ɔwn/ ⇒ /ɔm/).
+**This sound change affected all other inflections of the first person singular.
-* The nasal in ''*aiǵṓn'' "I" was subsequently labialized by the preceding vowel, shortening the nucleus (i.e. /ɔːn/ ⇒ /ɔwn/ ⇒ /ɔm/).
-** This sound change affected all other inflections of the first person singular.
 *** e.g. the Aryan form ''*nh<sub>0</sub>'' "me" became ''*mh<sub>0</sub>'', then PIE ''*me''.
 *The dual is formed by erasing sounds of the singular, then reduplicating it (e.g. ''*aiǵṓn'' ⇒ ''*ōyṓn''; ''*tū́'' ⇒ ''*ūyū́''), with medial ''*y'' inserted to avoid diphthongs.
-** The products of this process would eventually substitute the plural forms (i.e. ''*ṓns'' "we (plural)" ⇒ ∅, replaced by ''*ōyṓn'' "we (dual)" (Aryan) ⇒ ''*wéy'' "we (plural)" (PIE); ''*ūs'' "you (plural)" ⇒ ∅, replaced by ''*ūyú'' "you (dual)" (Aryan) ⇒ ''yū́'' "you (plural)" (PIE)).
+**The products of this process would eventually substitute the plural forms (i.e. ''*ṓns'' "we (plural)" ⇒ ∅, replaced by ''*ōyṓn'' "we (dual)" (Aryan) ⇒ ''*wéy'' "we (plural)" (PIE); ''*ūs'' "you (plural)" ⇒ ∅, replaced by ''*ūyú'' "you (dual)" (Aryan) ⇒ ''*yū́'' "you (plural)" (PIE)).
+*The plural is formed by erasing the reduplication of the dual, then adding the serial particle *-s- (e.g. ''*ōyṓn'' ⇒ ''*ṓns''; ''*ūyū́'' ⇒ ''*ū́s''), with medial ''*y'' removed due the impossibility of diphthongs.
-*twaya > *tweye > *tewe
-''ˈʕɨ̀ː-ɔː'' (Codex) > ''*aiǵṓn'' (Aryan) > ''*eǵh₂óm'' (PIE)
-Homeric Greek ''ἐγών'', Sanskrit ''अहम्'', Latin ''ego''
+*twya > *tewye > *téwe (gen.)
 ===Verb===