Adamic Code: Difference between revisions

Line 1,658:

Pronouns may also differ among themselves, as the distribution of their roots is formely distinguished as Eurasian and Laurentian paradigms, that would roughly address the two sets of pronoun patterns (m-T and n-m) historically associated with Northern Eurasia and Western America<ref name="Nichols, Peterson, 2013">Johanna Nichols, David A. Peterson. 2013. N-M Pronouns. In: Dryer, Matthew S. & Haspelmath, Martin (eds.) WALS Online (v2020.4) [Data set]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13950591 (Available online at http://wals.info/chapter/137, Accessed on 2025-01-20.)</ref>; however, they merely catalogue the most common used consonants for pronouns in the Diluvian Code, and therefore in Adamic:

~~: ''naocar'' "the near person" [Diluvian]~~

~~, ''taocar'' "the person of reference", ''yaocar'' "that person (3rd-person)", ''kaocar'' "this person", ''phaocar'' "the present person", and ''aocar'' "person").~~

*Eurasian:

~~=====Personal Pronouns=====~~

: ''naocar'' "the near person" [Diluvian] ⇒ ''-n-'' (1st person) [Adamic]

The ~~Eurasian paradigm~~ is ...

: ''taocar'' "the person of reference" [Diluvian] ⇒ ''-t-'' (2nd person) [Adamic]

: ''yaocar'' "that person (3rd-person)" [Diluvian] ⇒ ''-s-'' (3rd person) [Adamic]

*Laurentian:

: ''kaocar'' "this person" [Diluvian] ⇒ ''-k-'' (1st person) [Adamic]

: ''paocar'' "the present person" [Diluvian] ⇒ ''-p-'' (2nd person) [Adamic]

: ''aocar'' "person" [Diluvian] ⇒ ''-∅-'' (3rd person) [Adamic]

=====Plain Pronouns=====

The plain form of pronouns is equivalent to the absolute state of nouns, inflected by case. The Eurasian and Laurentian paradigms, for once, are as follows:

{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;"

Line 1,724:

Line 1,737:

|-

|}

~~The Laurentian paradigm is ...~~

{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;"

Line 1,788:

Line 1,799:

=====Enclitic Pronouns=====

~~reduced~~ to ~~clitics~~, ~~without inflection of~~ case

The enclitic form of pronouns is equivalent to the construct state of nouns, not inflected by case. The Eurasian and Laurentian paradigms, for once, are as follows:

The Eurasian ~~paradigm is ...~~

{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;"

Line 1,815:

Line 1,824:

! CONSONANT

| ut || un || us || aut || aun || aus || ūt || ūn || ūs

|-

! rowspan="1" |

! colspan="9" | NEUTER DECLENSION (EURASIAN)

|-

! VOWEL

| ta || na || sa || ∅ || ∅ || ∅ || tā || nā || sā

|-

! CONSONANT

| at || an || as || ∅ || ∅ || ∅ || āt || ān || ās

|-

! rowspan="1" |

Line 1,826:

Line 1,844:

|-

|}

~~The Laurentian paradigm is ...~~

{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;"

Line 1,852:

Line 1,868:

! CONSONANT

| up || uk || u || aup || auk || au || ūp || ūk || ū

|-

! rowspan="1" |

! colspan="9" | NEUTER DECLENSION (LAURENTIAN)

|-

! VOWEL

| pa || ka || ’a || ∅ || ∅ || ∅ || pā || kā || ’ā

|-

! CONSONANT

| ap || ak || a || ∅ || ∅ || ∅ || āp || āk || ā

|-

! rowspan="1" |

@@ Line 1,658: / Line 1,658: @@
 Pronouns may also differ among themselves, as the distribution of their roots is formely distinguished as Eurasian and Laurentian paradigms, that would roughly address the two sets of pronoun patterns (m-T and n-m) historically associated with Northern Eurasia and Western America<ref name="Nichols, Peterson, 2013">Johanna Nichols, David A. Peterson. 2013. N-M Pronouns. In: Dryer, Matthew S. & Haspelmath, Martin (eds.) WALS Online (v2020.4) [Data set]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13950591 (Available online at http://wals.info/chapter/137, Accessed on 2025-01-20.)</ref>; however, they merely catalogue the most common used consonants for pronouns in the Diluvian Code, and therefore in Adamic:
-: ''naocar'' "the near person" [Diluvian]
-, ''taocar'' "the person of reference", ''yaocar'' "that person (3<sup>rd</sup>-person)", ''kaocar'' "this person", ''phaocar'' "the present person", and ''aocar'' "person").
+*Eurasian:
-=====Personal Pronouns=====
+: ''naocar'' "the near person" [Diluvian] ⇒ ''-n-'' (1<sup>st</sup> person) [Adamic]
-The Eurasian paradigm is ...
+: ''taocar'' "the person of reference" [Diluvian] ⇒ ''-t-'' (2<sup>nd</sup> person) [Adamic]
+: ''yaocar'' "that person (3<sup>rd</sup>-person)" [Diluvian] ⇒ ''-s-'' (3<sup>rd</sup> person) [Adamic]
+*Laurentian:
+: ''kaocar'' "this person" [Diluvian] ⇒ ''-k-'' (1<sup>st</sup> person) [Adamic]
+: ''paocar'' "the present person" [Diluvian] ⇒ ''-p-'' (2<sup>nd</sup> person) [Adamic]
+: ''aocar'' "person" [Diluvian] ⇒ ''-∅-'' (3<sup>rd</sup> person) [Adamic]
+=====Plain Pronouns=====
+The plain form of pronouns is equivalent to the absolute state of nouns, inflected by case. The Eurasian and Laurentian paradigms, for once, are as follows:
 {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;"
@@ Line 1,724: / Line 1,737: @@
 |-
 |}
-The Laurentian paradigm is ...
 {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;"
@@ Line 1,788: / Line 1,799: @@
 =====Enclitic Pronouns=====
-reduced to clitics, without inflection of case
+The enclitic form of pronouns is equivalent to the construct state of nouns, not inflected by case. The Eurasian and Laurentian paradigms, for once, are as follows:
-The Eurasian paradigm is ...
 {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;"
@@ Line 1,815: / Line 1,824: @@
 ! <small>CONSONANT</small>
 | ut || un || us || aut || aun || aus || ūt || ūn || ūs
+|-
+! rowspan="1" |
+! colspan="9" | NEUTER DECLENSION (EURASIAN)
+|-
+! <small>VOWEL</small>
+| ta || na || sa || ∅ || ∅ || ∅ || tā || nā || sā
+|-
+! <small>CONSONANT</small>
+| at || an || as || ∅ || ∅ || ∅ || āt || ān || ās
 |-
 ! rowspan="1" |
@@ Line 1,826: / Line 1,844: @@
 |-
 |}
-The Laurentian paradigm is ...
 {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;"
@@ Line 1,852: / Line 1,868: @@
 ! <small>CONSONANT</small>
 | up || uk || u || aup || auk || au || ūp || ūk || ū
+|-
+! rowspan="1" |
+! colspan="9" | NEUTER DECLENSION (LAURENTIAN)
+|-
+! <small>VOWEL</small>
+| pa || ka || ’a || ∅ || ∅ || ∅ || pā || kā || ’ā
+|-
+! <small>CONSONANT</small>
+| ap || ak || a || ∅ || ∅ || ∅ || āp || āk || ā
 |-
 ! rowspan="1" |