Adamic Code: Difference between revisions

Veno (talk | contribs)
Veno (talk | contribs)
Line 757: Line 757:
|}
|}


The most important morphemes are by far the roots.
[...]
Roots specifically, due their generative nature (in total there are 13.824 of those), do not justify their semantics with etymology. Rather, the specific arrangement of sounds in each root carries a variety of meanings and interpretations from already existing languages. One of the most remarkable features of Adamic, after all, is its naming prowess by ackowledging a concept into triliteral form. Within the language, such an attribute is encouraged and never seen as arbitrary, because for every combination, an actual word is always being brought and compared against, so that meaning is never scarce. Most often, names of famous figures (fictional or not) ascribe complex ideas within the  sequence of consonants, due their association of feats. The transfiguration of names into a triliteral form may be boundless and informal, or follow a select list of rules for further organization:
Roots specifically, due their generative nature (in total there are 13.824 of those), do not justify their semantics with etymology. Rather, the specific arrangement of sounds in each root carries a variety of meanings and interpretations from already existing languages. One of the most remarkable features of Adamic, after all, is its naming prowess by ackowledging a concept into triliteral form. Within the language, such an attribute is encouraged and never seen as arbitrary, because for every combination, an actual word is always being brought and compared against, so that meaning is never scarce. Most often, names of famous figures (fictional or not) ascribe complex ideas within the  sequence of consonants, due their association of feats. The transfiguration of names into a triliteral form may be boundless and informal, or follow a select list of rules for further organization: