Wug Nlab: Difference between revisions

mNo edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
(THIS IS A SKETCH)
(THIS IS A SKETCH)


(''Ntzog Schlaub Nlab''?) probably created by mathematicians, particle physicists, and programmers
(''Wug Nlab'') probably created by mathematicians, particle physicists, and programmers


Spoken in ~3000 fT, might really be the most mathematical future Trician language?
Spoken in ~3000 fT, might really be the most mathematical future Trician language?
Borrow set theory and grammatical words from Quintlanic (WIP conlang by me), and borrow notions of classes and functions?
This would have 8 tones instead of 7 (eszett and s tone get merged into s, two more tones from Quintlanic)


Uses fT 2400 Hlou instead
Uses fT 2400 Hlou instead


Part-logographic part-featural? This would explain the 'logographs' (mathematical symbols)
Part-logographic part-featural? This would explain the 'logographs' (mathematical symbols)
Maybe half-letters?


[https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1GKW7GMbEWYWGLXekMigVVjCcG8Kv7GrN/edit?usp=sharing&ouid=101010641529817772370&rtpof=true&sd=true Grammar and particles are entirely stolen from here.]
[https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1GKW7GMbEWYWGLXekMigVVjCcG8Kv7GrN/edit?usp=sharing&ouid=101010641529817772370&rtpof=true&sd=true Grammar and particles are entirely stolen from here.]