Wug Nlab: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
(THIS IS A SKETCH) | (THIS IS A SKETCH) | ||
('' | (''Wug Nlab'') probably created by mathematicians, particle physicists, and programmers | ||
Spoken in ~3000 fT, might really be the most mathematical future Trician language? | Spoken in ~3000 fT, might really be the most mathematical future Trician language? | ||
Uses fT 2400 Hlou instead | Uses fT 2400 Hlou instead | ||
Part-logographic part-featural? This would explain the 'logographs' (mathematical symbols) | Part-logographic part-featural? This would explain the 'logographs' (mathematical symbols) | ||
Maybe half-letters? | |||
[https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1GKW7GMbEWYWGLXekMigVVjCcG8Kv7GrN/edit?usp=sharing&ouid=101010641529817772370&rtpof=true&sd=true Grammar and particles are entirely stolen from here.] | [https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1GKW7GMbEWYWGLXekMigVVjCcG8Kv7GrN/edit?usp=sharing&ouid=101010641529817772370&rtpof=true&sd=true Grammar and particles are entirely stolen from here.] | ||