Dundulanyä: Difference between revisions

Lili21 (talk | contribs)
Lili21 (talk | contribs)
Line 76: Line 76:
===Nouns===
===Nouns===
(TBA: introduction, declension)
(TBA: introduction, declension)
The consensus among linguists is that Dundulanyä does not have grammatical gender or noun classes; however, it should be noted that natural gender is shown on some nouns referring to humans, and furthermore there are some verbs that have a complementary distribution - most notably the existential "to be" - where one verb can only be used for inanimate subjects and another only for animate ones; in a few cases, the animate "class" is also split between humans and non-humans. None of this, however, is reflected in morphology.


Dundulanyä declensions are primarily categorized by whether they refer to nouns that undergo ablaut or not; secondarily, they are categorized by their stem type.
Dundulanyä declensions are primarily categorized by whether they refer to nouns that undergo ablaut or not; secondarily, they are categorized by their stem type.
Line 88: Line 90:
* Zero-ending nouns with stems ending in liquids (''-l'' or ''-r''), nasals (''-m'' or ''-n'') or the glottal stop (''-h'') (second consonant stem declension)
* Zero-ending nouns with stems ending in liquids (''-l'' or ''-r''), nasals (''-m'' or ''-n'') or the glottal stop (''-h'') (second consonant stem declension)
* Nouns with vowel-final stems.
* Nouns with vowel-final stems.
** The extremely common ''-a'' declension is a particular case, as it behaves in some forms like a consonant stem declension, and like a vowel stem in others. Both for ablauting and non-ablauting declensions, ''-a'' and ''-e'' declensions most likely marked some kind of noun class distinction in the proto-language, which has been lost in the evolution of what became Dundulanyä.


====Bound forms====
====Bound forms====