Verse:Irta/Modern Hebrew: Difference between revisions
m →Syntax Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
* tav~tet /t̪ʰ/ and dalet /d̪/ have postvocalic allophones [θ] and [ð] (which don't correspond to dagesh) | * tav~tet /t̪ʰ/ and dalet /d̪/ have postvocalic allophones [θ] and [ð] (which don't correspond to dagesh) | ||
* Irta Modern Hebrew pronounces he mappiq (final /h/) and doesn't have the /-ɑh/ > /-hɑ/ metathesis like our Israeli Hebrew. | * Irta Modern Hebrew pronounces he mappiq (final /h/) and doesn't have the /-ɑh/ > /-hɑ/ metathesis like our Israeli Hebrew. | ||
* | * ''Really'' snobby prescriptivists would insist that leniting dageshed tav, tet or dageshed dalet is incorrect, but basically no one would actually succeed at the "correct" pronunciation; they'd at best fail to lenite (which is like our Israeli Hebrew). | ||
=== Qamatz-patach minimal pairs === | === Qamatz-patach minimal pairs === | ||
* /bɒ'kʰɒɹ/ 'cattle, beef' vs /ba'kʰɒɹ/ 'inspector, supervisor' | * /bɒ'kʰɒɹ/ 'cattle, beef' vs /ba'kʰɒɹ/ 'inspector, supervisor' | ||