Verse:Irta/Judeo-Mandarin/Filichdiș: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 05:01, 8 November 2021 view source IlL (talk \| contribs) Bots 143,283 edits Created page with "Learăgüsiș forms are extremely marked: they're considered archaic and poetic at best, and deliberately "overusing" them is used for evoking certain Ăn Yidiș literary work..."		Revision as of 01:31, 3 December 2021 view source IlL (talk \| contribs) Bots 143,283 edits mNo edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Newer edit →
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Learăgüsiș forms are extremely marked: they're considered archaic and poetic at best, and deliberately "overusing" them is used for evoking certain Ăn Yidiș literary works, or e.g. in neopagan/new-religious-movement material.		Learăgüsiș forms are extremely marked: they're considered archaic and poetic at best, and deliberately "overusing" them is used for evoking certain Ăn Yidiș literary works, or e.g. in neopagan/new-religious-movement material. These forms, including synthetic verb forms, are best preserved in Munster Irish, and Ăn Yidiș writers created these forms by cognatizing older Irish or Munster Irish forms.