Niemish: Difference between revisions
Tardigrade (talk | contribs) |
Tardigrade (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 136: | Line 136: | ||
A sequence of a plain consonant followed by a front vowel is realised with a velar offglide inserted (or a labiovelar offglide after labial consonants): | A sequence of a plain consonant followed by a front vowel is realised with a velar offglide inserted (or a labiovelar offglide after labial consonants): | ||
*dächs /deːxs/ [dɰeːxs] | *dächs /deːxs/ [dɰeːxs] | ||
*kyna /ˈkɨːna/ [ | *kyna /ˈkɨːna/ [ˈkɰɨːnə] | ||
*bärs /beɾs/ [bweɾs] | *bärs /beɾs/ [bweɾs] | ||
*ęfynund /ɪ̃ˈfwɨːnən/ [ɪ̃ˈfwɨːnən] | *ęfynund /ɪ̃ˈfwɨːnən/ [ɪ̃ˈfwɨːnən] | ||
| Line 178: | Line 178: | ||
''g'' devoiced to a velar fricative [x], transcribed here as ''χ''. | ''g'' devoiced to a velar fricative [x], transcribed here as ''χ''. | ||
Between a nasal and a following liquid consonant, a voiced plosive was inserted: | |||
*Got. ''[[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Germanic/𐍄𐌹𐌼𐍂𐌾𐌰𐌽|timrjan]]'' → Post-Got. ''timbrjan'' (note that ''[[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Germanic/𐍄𐌹𐌼𐌱𐍂𐌾𐌰𐌽|timbrjan]]'' already existed as a variant in Gothic) | |||
*P-Gmc. ''[[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Germanic/þunraz#Proto-Germanic|*þunraz]]'' → Got. ''*þundrs'' → Post-Got. ''þundars'' | |||
Prefixes such as ''in-'' and ''un-'' were unaffected however. | |||
===Development of Niemish proper=== | ===Development of Niemish proper=== | ||
====Coronal palatalisation==== | |||
Post-Gothic ''tj, dj, sj, zj'' → Niemish /tːs, z, ʃ, ʒ/ | |||
This was a very early sound change, likely taking effect in late Post-Gothic itself. It is also thought that ''dj'' initially became */dz/ before /z/, and that all of these were originally geminated before the fricatives were degeminated, as shown by the fact that ''[[wikt:𐌳𐌰𐌳𐌳𐌾𐌰𐌽#Gothic|daddjan]]'' became ''dazund''; had /z/ arisen in the Post-Gothic period, extended Thurneysen's law would have devoiced the consonant to give ''*dasund''. There are no examples of ''z'' arising from the coronal palatalisation being affected by extended Thurneysen's law. | |||
====First umlaut (umlaut pattern 1. or i-umlaut)==== | ====First umlaut (umlaut pattern 1. or i-umlaut)==== | ||
| Line 188: | Line 198: | ||
The second umlaut affected both long and short vowels. | The second umlaut affected both long and short vowels. | ||
The coronal palatalisation seems to have still been active when the second umlaut appeared, as: | |||
====Development of nasal vowels==== | ====Development of nasal vowels==== | ||
| Line 196: | Line 209: | ||
*Lat. ''[[wikt:amphora#Latin|amphora]]'' → Post-Got. ''amfaúra'' → ''ąfor'' → ''ąchor'' | *Lat. ''[[wikt:amphora#Latin|amphora]]'' → Post-Got. ''amfaúra'' → ''ąfor'' → ''ąchor'' | ||
After syncope, /ml, nl, mr, nr/ were reintroduced into the language outside of prefixes. | |||
Subsequently, /n/ was lost with compensatory lengthening before liquid consonants /l, r/: | |||
*Got. ''[[wikt:𐌺𐌿𐌽𐌹#Gothic|*kuni]][[wikt:-𐌻𐌹𐌲𐌲𐍃#Gothic|lig̃gs]]'' → ''kunling'' → ''kųlling'' | |||
There was no compensatory lengthening when the syllable with the nasal coda was unstressed, as with words prefixed with ''an-'', ''in-'', ''un-'': | |||
*Got. ''[[wikt:𐌿𐌽𐌻𐌿𐍃𐍄𐌿𐍃#Gothic|unlustus]]'' → ''unlust'' → ''ųlust'' | |||
*P-Gmc. ''[[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Germanic/unrehtaz#Proto-Germanic|*unrehtaz]]'' → ''unriat'' → ''ųriat'' | |||
/m/ was not lost, but experienced stop insertion much as in Post-Gothic: | |||
*P-Gmc. ''[[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Germanic/sumaraz#Proto-Germanic|*sumaraz]]'' → ''somar'' → ''sumbar'' | |||
Early medieval Niemish had forms such as ''somar'' and ''somor'', which developed into ''sǫwr'' in the Westlandic dialect. Presumably the /b/ was inserted into the definite form ''somran'', the /o/ lowered by the /mb/ to give ''sumbran'', and the /b/ later spread to all forms of the word by analogy. Likewise, the Westlandic form developed from ''somran'' → ''sǫwran'' in a sound change more akin to that described above for /n/ with similar analogical spreading. | |||
Nasal vowels followed by a fricative in unstressed final syllables lost their nasalisation: | Nasal vowels followed by a fricative in unstressed final syllables lost their nasalisation: | ||
*Got. ''[[wikt:𐍄𐌿𐌲𐌲𐍉𐌽𐍃#Gothic|tug̃gōns]]'' → Post-Got. ''tug̃gūns'' → ''tungą̄s'' → ''tungas'' | *Got. ''[[wikt:𐍄𐌿𐌲𐌲𐍉𐌽𐍃#Gothic|tug̃gōns]]'' → Post-Got. ''tug̃gūns'' → ''tungą̄s'' → ''tungas'' | ||
*Got. ''[[wikt:𐌹𐌽#Gothic|in]]'' → ''į'' → ''i'' (although note ''in'' before words beginning with a vowel) | *Got. ''[[wikt:𐌹𐌽#Gothic|in]]'' → ''į'' → ''i'' (although note ''in'' before words beginning with a vowel) | ||
Nasals that formed the end of a root, as in ''[[wikt:𐌷𐌰𐌹𐌼𐍃#Gothic|háims]]'' and ''[[wikt:𐌰𐌻𐌾𐌰𐌽#Gothic|aljan]]'' were either not lost or more likely restored by analogy with forms with inflectional endings; the Niemish descendants of these words are ''[[Contionary:ham|ham]]'' and ''[[Contionary:älin|älin]]''. | |||
====S-palatalisation==== | ====S-palatalisation==== | ||