Verse:Hmøøh/Mărotłism: Difference between revisions

← Older edit Newer edit →

Revision as of 05:37, 21 May 2019 view source IlL (talk \| contribs) Bots 143,283 edits mNo edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 05:38, 21 May 2019 view source IlL (talk \| contribs) Bots 143,283 edits mNo edit summary Newer edit →
Line 9:		Line 9:
	The originally Mărotłian concept of ''dipăreatü'' is a principle of nonviolence, analogous to ''ahiṃsa'' in Dharmic religions. (The [[Windermere]] word ''dipăreatü'' means 'non-aggression'.) Mărotłian ''dipăreatü'' allows violence in retaliation or self-defense, or as a punishment for violence - the reasoning was that aggression is so serious that it should be discouraged by any means necessary. There has been much debate among Talman thinkers on exactly how much retributive violence is justified.		The originally Mărotłian concept of ''dipăreatü'' is a principle of nonviolence, analogous to ''ahiṃsa'' in Dharmic religions. (The [[Windermere]] word ''dipăreatü'' means 'non-aggression'.) Mărotłian ''dipăreatü'' allows violence in retaliation or self-defense, or as a punishment for violence - the reasoning was that aggression is so serious that it should be discouraged by any means necessary. There has been much debate among Talman thinkers on exactly how much retributive violence is justified.

	Both Mărotłism and strict forms of Ngronaism teach that this implies a moral commandment for vegetarianism (or ~~after the invention of synthetic vitamin B12~~, veganism).		Both Mărotłism and strict forms of Ngronaism teach that this implies a moral commandment for vegetarianism (or in modern times, veganism).