Bgapian: Difference between revisions
m →Verbs |
|||
| Line 185: | Line 185: | ||
Modern Netagin has an extreme form of split-ergativity in that ''ergativity marks tense'' in transitive clauses: When an ergative preposition is used, the clause is in the past tense; otherwise, it is in the non-past tense. This came about via the conflation of two prepositions ''să-'' 'in, at' and ''se3þe'' 'after' in an older split-ergative system. | Modern Netagin has an extreme form of split-ergativity in that ''ergativity marks tense'' in transitive clauses: When an ergative preposition is used, the clause is in the past tense; otherwise, it is in the non-past tense. This came about via the conflation of two prepositions ''să-'' 'in, at' and ''se3þe'' 'after' in an older split-ergative system. | ||
For intransitive clauses, | For intransitive clauses, the past tense is marked by an ergative preposition used on the subject, even though the subject is not syntactically ergative. | ||
====Non-past==== | ====Non-past==== | ||
:'''''Se ʔadnaʔe reȝun ʔaxd.''''' | :'''''Se ʔadnaʔe reȝun ʔaxd.''''' | ||