Minhast: Difference between revisions
Fixed up some backwards arguments |
m cleanup |
||
| Line 2,572: | Line 2,572: | ||
}} | }} | ||
For non-coreferent arguments as the O-argument, the other dialects nominalize the focus clause (the clause containing the secondary core argument of the entire discourse unit<sup>7</sup>) while the non-focus clause is marked with the Resultative ''-dur-/-dūr-'' suffix. The verb of the non-focus clause must also be transitivized by the Comitative Applicative ''-kan-''. This allows the O-argument of the nominalized clause to be coreferrent with the derived O-argument of the non-focus clause, thus maintaining the S/O pivot: | For non-coreferent arguments as the O-argument, the other dialects nominalize the focus clause (the clause containing the secondary core argument of the entire discourse unit<sup>7</sup>) while the non-focus clause is marked with the Resultative ''-dur-/-dūr-'' suffix. The verb of the non-focus clause must also be transitivized by the Comitative Applicative ''-kan-''. This allows the O-argument of the nominalized clause to be coreferrent with the derived O-argument of the non-focus clause, thus maintaining the S/O pivot: | ||