Chlouvānem/Morphology: Difference between revisions

Lili21 (talk | contribs)
Lili21 (talk | contribs)
Line 1,181: Line 1,181:
| 3PL || gyekṣat || gyāsi || gyantṛ || jeivyąt || jeivikṣat || muñjyąt || mokṣyąt || gināyąt || maippuyąt<br/><small>''maipryąt'' attested but archaic</small>
| 3PL || gyekṣat || gyāsi || gyantṛ || jeivyąt || jeivikṣat || muñjyąt || mokṣyąt || gināyąt || maippuyąt<br/><small>''maipryąt'' attested but archaic</small>
|}
|}
=====In compound verbs=====
There are some compound verbs which are formed by a "meaning stem" + ''gyake''; they conjugate just like ''gyake'' does:
* ''pṛšcāṃgyake'' "to like"<ref>More properly "to be pleasing", e.g. ''lunai liū pṛšcāmvæl'' "tea is pleasing to me" → "I like tea".</ref> → present ''pṛšcāmvalu'', ''pṛšcāmvali'', ''pṛšcāmvæl''... past ''pṛšcāmmos'', ''pṛšcāmmoçi'', ''pṛšcāmmitь''... perfect ''pṛšcāmegyam''... future ''pṛšcāmmavū'' ; the same in other moods, e.g. necessitative present ''pṛšcāmmokṣyu'', ''pṛšcāmmokṣyi''...<br/>Note that in colloquial speech the form of ''gyake'' is omitted in the present indicative, e.g. ''pṛšcām'' is "to be pleasing" for all persons.


===Analytic constructions and auxiliary verbs===
===Analytic constructions and auxiliary verbs===