Gothevian: Difference between revisions

Line 446:

|}

</div>

# Qɛ́rsy and ƕaíry are pronounced identically to kápy and hály respectively but alter the pronunciation of the following vowel ([[#Digraphs_and_Trigraphs|see below]]).

# Đɛ́ty and cɛ́ty are pronounced as /ʒ/ and /ʃ/ in unstressed and/or coda positions.

Apart from zéty ({{lang|gthv|sc=Gthv|z}}), éty ({{lang|gthv|sc=Gthv|e}}), đɛ́ty ({{lang|gthv|sc=Gthv|đ}}), ɔ́my ({{lang|gthv|sc=Gthv|ɔ}}), and cɛ́ty ({{lang|gthv|sc=Gthv|c}}), all Gothevian letters can be directly traced to a Gothic-script source. The source of đɛ́ty and cɛ́ty specifically is a point of contention, as no unambigious source has been identified. The many theories include the following:

...

# Current mainstream theories argue for a [[w:Coptic_script|Coptic]] source for cɛ́ty, citing [[wikt:ϭ#Coptic|čima]] (ϭ) as the most likely candidate, followed by [[wikt:ϯ#Coptic|ti]] (ϯ). A Coptic source for đɛ́ty is more dubious, with the likeliest candidate, [[wikt:ϫ#Coptic|janjia]] (ϫ), bearing less of a resemblance than the candidates for cɛ́ty.

# Likewise, đɛ́ty is near-unanimously believed to be derived from a Cyrillic source, with most mainstream theories putting forward [[w:Tse (Cyrillic)|tse (ц)]] or [[w:Che (Cyrillic)|che]] (ч) as probable sources. Less supported theories instead propose [[w:Djerv|djerv]] (ꙉ) due to its alphabetical order being nearer to that of đɛ́ty. Djerv has also been proposed as a source for cɛ́ty as a more fringe position, alongside an adaptation of a [[wikt:yer|yer]] (ь~ъ).

# ...

===Digraphs and Trigraphs===

{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;"

@@ Line 446: / Line 446: @@
 |}
 </div>
+# Qɛ́rsy and ƕaíry are pronounced identically to kápy and hály respectively but alter the pronunciation of the following vowel ([[#Digraphs_and_Trigraphs|see below]]).
+# Đɛ́ty and cɛ́ty are pronounced as /ʒ/ and /ʃ/ in unstressed and/or coda positions.
 Apart from zéty ({{lang|gthv|sc=Gthv|z}}), éty ({{lang|gthv|sc=Gthv|e}}), đɛ́ty ({{lang|gthv|sc=Gthv|đ}}), ɔ́my ({{lang|gthv|sc=Gthv|ɔ}}), and cɛ́ty ({{lang|gthv|sc=Gthv|c}}), all Gothevian letters can be directly traced to a Gothic-script source. The source of đɛ́ty and cɛ́ty specifically is a point of contention, as no unambigious source has been identified. The many theories include the following:
-...
+# Current mainstream theories argue for a [[w:Coptic_script|Coptic]] source for cɛ́ty, citing [[wikt:ϭ#Coptic|čima]] (ϭ) as the most likely candidate, followed by [[wikt:ϯ#Coptic|ti]] (ϯ). A Coptic source for đɛ́ty is more dubious, with the likeliest candidate, [[wikt:ϫ#Coptic|janjia]] (ϫ), bearing less of a resemblance than the candidates for cɛ́ty.
+# Likewise, đɛ́ty is near-unanimously believed to be derived from a Cyrillic source, with most mainstream theories putting forward [[w:Tse (Cyrillic)|tse (ц)]] or [[w:Che (Cyrillic)|che]] (ч) as probable sources. Less supported theories instead propose [[w:Djerv|djerv]] (ꙉ) due to its alphabetical order being nearer to that of đɛ́ty. Djerv has also been proposed as a source for cɛ́ty as a more fringe position, alongside an adaptation of a [[wikt:yer|yer]] (ь~ъ).
+# ...
 ===Digraphs and Trigraphs===
 {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;"