Verse:Mwail/Bri: Difference between revisions
m →Tones |
|||
| Line 69: | Line 69: | ||
==== Notes on terminology ==== | ==== Notes on terminology ==== | ||
5th Millennium Bri has undergone three tone splits (or tonogeneses if one would view it that way): | |||
# The first tone split (no tone to 3 tones) was based on Proto-Bri initial phonation which was largely predictable from the Proto-Ker initial phonation. | |||
# The second tone split (3 tones to 12 tones) was based on Proto-Ker final type. | |||
# The third tone split (12 tones to 24 tones) was based on the phonation distinction that had arisen after prenasalized initials became voiced ones. | |||
In English, we have chosen to term the initial phonation that conditioned the first phonation-based (3-way) tone split ''protoechesis'' (from πρῶτος 'first' + ἤχησις 'sounding'). The initial phonation that conditioned the second phonation-based (2-way) tone split (which caused Bri to double its number of tones from a 12-tone stage) is called ''deuteroechesis''; for deuteroechesis, voiceless consonants are denoted - and voiced ones are denoted +. We'll use the term ''deuteroechesis'' more because protoechesis is just the initial phonation in Proto-Keric. | In English, we have chosen to term the initial phonation that conditioned the first phonation-based (3-way) tone split ''protoechesis'' (from πρῶτος 'first' + ἤχησις 'sounding'). The initial phonation that conditioned the second phonation-based (2-way) tone split (which caused Bri to double its number of tones from a 12-tone stage) is called ''deuteroechesis''; for deuteroechesis, voiceless consonants are denoted - and voiced ones are denoted +. We'll use the term ''deuteroechesis'' more because protoechesis is just the initial phonation in Proto-Keric. | ||
== Grammar == | == Grammar == | ||