Adamic Code: Difference between revisions
| Line 2,327: | Line 2,327: | ||
The so called construct state plays an important role in adamic syntax, being responsible for distinguishing compositions among themselves in order to make sense of a select class of grammatical cases in the articles (wherein the construct can always be identified as the subject). For example, the nominative, oblique, accusative, ergative, dative, and genitive, for once, are known to trigger it when two inflections of the triptote formula conflate, as in: | The so called construct state plays an important role in adamic syntax, being responsible for distinguishing compositions among themselves in order to make sense of a select class of grammatical cases in the articles (wherein the construct can always be identified as the subject). For example, the nominative, oblique, accusative, ergative, dative, and genitive, for once, are known to trigger it when two inflections of the triptote formula conflate, as in: | ||
: ''bîbliri'' "to/towards the book" + iri saíkat "from/of the philosopher" | : ''bîbliri'' "to/towards the book" + ''iri saíkat'' "from/of the philosopher" | ||
The logical exclusion of one ''iri'' for means of redudancy does not indicate the syntactic relationship alone, but is accompanied by the construct with two possibilities: | The logical exclusion of one ''iri'' for means of redudancy does not indicate the syntactic relationship alone, but is accompanied by the construct with two possibilities: | ||
| Line 2,337: | Line 2,337: | ||
====Nouns==== | ====Nouns==== | ||
When costructs, nouns lose their triptote inflection, while still behaving as independent subjects. | |||
{{interlinear|lang=fi|number=(1) | {{interlinear|lang=fi|number=(1) | ||
| Line 2,399: | Line 2,399: | ||
====Pronouns==== | ====Pronouns==== | ||
When | When costructs, pronouns lose their triptote inflection, becoming enclitics attached to the unit they are subjects of. | ||
{{interlinear|lang=fi|number=(1) | {{interlinear|lang=fi|number=(1) | ||