Adamic Code: Difference between revisions

Line 777:

* '''Rule 0:''' Consonants are counted as first-class members, then vowels as second-class (except sounds akin to /a/), and finally semivowels as third-class members. All members being susceptible to be substituted by equivalent sounds.

: e.g.1 ''m'' and ''n'' can be achieved through nasal consonants. Therefore /ŋ/ > ''n''.

: e.g.1 ''m'' and ''n'' can be achieved through nasal consonants. Therefore /ŋ/ ⇒ ''n''.

: e.g.2 ''p'', ''b'', ''p’'', ''b’'', ''t'', ''d'', ''t’'', ''d’'', ''k'', ''g'', ''k’'', and ''g’'' can be achieved through plosives, even if secondary characteristics are present. Therefore /pʰ/ > ''p’'', but /ɸ/ > ''f''.

: e.g.2 ''p'', ''b'', ''p’'', ''b’'', ''t'', ''d'', ''t’'', ''d’'', ''k'', ''g'', ''k’'', and ''g’'' can be achieved through plosives, even if secondary characteristics are present. Therefore /pʰ/ ⇒ ''p’'', but /ɸ/ ⇒ ''f''.

: e.g.3 ''r'' and ''l'' can be achieved through liquid consonants, even if secondary characteristics are present. Therefore /ɾ/ > ''r'', and /ʎ/ > ''l''.

: e.g.3 ''r'' and ''l'' can be achieved through liquid consonants, even if secondary characteristics are present. Therefore /ɾ/ ⇒ ''r'', and /ʎ/ ⇒ ''l''.

: e.g.4 ''h'' and ''q'' in special can be achieved through laryngeals, with a treatment of ''q'' as voiced. Therefore /ħ/ > ''h'', and /ʁ/ > ''q''.

: e.g.4 ''h'' and ''q'' in special can be achieved through laryngeals, with a treatment of ''q'' as voiced. Therefore /ħ/ ⇒ ''h'', and /ʁ/ ⇒ ''q''.

: e.g.5 As there is no /j/ and /w/ in the Adamic Code (except as grammatical semivowels), those sounds become ''z'' and ''v'' if relevantly voiced. On the other hand, if vowels such as /i/, /e/, /u/, /o/, and /a/ are considered, such sounds are represented by ''s'', ''z'', ''f'', ''v'', and ''’'' respectively.

Line 821:

In the sample above, the process involving the triliteration of Diluvian words is particular. Besides basic sound changes, such as the laryngeal following the currents /h/ > /h/ and /ħ/ > /ɦ/ (not /h/ in this case), or the particle /-t͡səɾ/ regularly transforming into /-l-/, it is noticeable that vowels are not treated discriminately, but are counted in order as much as consonants; instead, secondary particles such as the ''ya-'' and ''-(c)ar'' in ''yammuhar'' are counted last and even neglected.

Another special class of triconsonantal roots is the one containing those influenced by the [[Pangaean Code]]. This class may either be secluded to abstract ideas or actions, or rarely include the borrowing of proper lexicon (e.g. ''-q-h-f-'' "animalism" in Adamic being from ''uħihu'' "animal" in Pangaean, rather than ''au'' "animal" in Diluvian). [.~~..]~~

Another special class of triconsonantal roots is the one containing those influenced by the [[Pangaean Code]]. This class may either be secluded to abstract ideas or actions, or rarely include the borrowing of proper lexicon (e.g. ''-q-h-f-'' "animalism" in Adamic being from ''uħihu'' "animal" in Pangaean, rather than ''au'' "animal" in Diluvian). Diluvian influence is only relevant through phonological filters, which operate under other constraints, such as the medial member of a combination often being reserved to a glottal stop, and an epenthetic ''-r-'' being added in the third position of a primordial construction.

: ''n̠'' "ancientness" [Pangaean] ⇒ ''kna'' "ancientness" [Diluvian] ⇒ ''-k-’-n-'' "aging" [Adamic]

: ''p'' "bearing" [Pangaean] ⇒ ''pa'' "bearing" [Diluvian] ⇒ ''-p-’-r-'' "bearing" [Adamic]

: [...]

~~Diluvian influence is still relevant through phonological filters...~~ the ~~medial~~ member ~~of a combination is often reserved to a glottal stop,~~ and ~~if able~~, ~~''r'' is added in~~ the ~~third position to mark it as a primordial construction~~.

Other functionalities of triconsonantal roots include fusion, wherein the possessed element has the first member conserved and the second and third erased, while the possessive element has merely the medial member erased.

: ''~~n̠'' "ancientness" [Pangaean] = ''kna~~'' "~~ancientness~~" ~~[Diluvian] >~~ ''-k-’-n-~~'' "aging" [Adamic]~~

: ''-q-h-f-'' "animalism" + ''-p-’-r-'' "bearing" = ''-q-p-r-'' "ensnaring

~~: ''p~~'' "bearing" ~~[Pangaean]~~ = ''~~pa'' "bearing" [Diluvian] > ''~~-p-’-r-'' "~~bearing" [Adamic]~~

====Nouns====

~~Fusion~~

Furthermore, roots possess the property of fusion, wherein the possessed element has the first member conserved and the second and third erased, while the possessive element has merely the medial member erased.

~~: ''-q-h-f-'' "animalism" + ''-p-’-r-'' "bearing" = ''-q-p-r-'' "ensnaring~~

The Adamic Code mostly functions through patterns, or the configuration of vowels into the very structures of consonantal roots. There can be nominal (''-/-/-/-'', ''-/-/-/'', ''/-/-/-'', ''/-//'', ''//-/'',), positional (''/-/'', ''-//'', ''//-'', ''-/-'', ''/--'', ''--/''), verbal (''/-//-'', ''-/-//'', ''-//-/'', ''//-/-'', ''-///-'', ''/-/-/'', ''-/-/'', ''/-/-'').

Line 883:

Line 881:

while definition is dropped in pronouns. The result is 108 permutations known to reduce grammatical functions thanks to a trio of particles (''i'', ''u'', and ''a'') specialized in capturing meaning. Vide:

~~====Nouns====~~

@@ Line 777: / Line 777: @@
 * '''Rule 0:''' Consonants are counted as first-class members, then vowels as second-class (except sounds akin to /a/), and finally semivowels as third-class members. All members being susceptible to be substituted by equivalent sounds.
-: e.g.<sub>1</sub> ''m'' and ''n'' can be achieved through nasal consonants. Therefore /ŋ/ > ''n''.
+: e.g.<sub>1</sub> ''m'' and ''n'' can be achieved through nasal consonants. Therefore /ŋ/ ⇒ ''n''.
-: e.g.<sub>2</sub> ''p'', ''b'', ''p’'', ''b’'', ''t'', ''d'', ''t’'', ''d’'', ''k'', ''g'', ''k’'', and ''g’'' can be achieved through plosives, even if secondary characteristics are present. Therefore /pʰ/ > ''p’'', but /ɸ/ > ''f''.
+: e.g.<sub>2</sub> ''p'', ''b'', ''p’'', ''b’'', ''t'', ''d'', ''t’'', ''d’'', ''k'', ''g'', ''k’'', and ''g’'' can be achieved through plosives, even if secondary characteristics are present. Therefore /pʰ/ ⇒ ''p’'', but /ɸ/ ⇒ ''f''.
-: e.g.<sub>3</sub> ''r'' and ''l'' can be achieved through liquid consonants, even if secondary characteristics are present. Therefore /ɾ/ > ''r'', and /ʎ/ > ''l''.
+: e.g.<sub>3</sub> ''r'' and ''l'' can be achieved through liquid consonants, even if secondary characteristics are present. Therefore /ɾ/ ⇒ ''r'', and /ʎ/ ⇒ ''l''.
-: e.g.<sub>4</sub> ''h'' and ''q'' in special can be achieved through laryngeals, with a treatment of ''q'' as voiced. Therefore /ħ/ > ''h'', and /ʁ/ > ''q''.
+: e.g.<sub>4</sub> ''h'' and ''q'' in special can be achieved through laryngeals, with a treatment of ''q'' as voiced. Therefore /ħ/ ⇒ ''h'', and /ʁ/ ⇒ ''q''.
 : e.g.<sub>5</sub> As there is no /j/ and /w/ in the Adamic Code (except as grammatical semivowels), those sounds become ''z'' and ''v'' if relevantly voiced. On the other hand, if vowels such as /i/, /e/, /u/, /o/, and /a/ are considered, such sounds are represented by ''s'', ''z'', ''f'', ''v'', and ''’'' respectively.
@@ Line 821: / Line 821: @@
 In the sample above, the process involving the triliteration of Diluvian words is particular. Besides basic sound changes, such as the laryngeal following the currents /h/ > /h/ and /ħ/ > /ɦ/ (not /h/ in this case), or the particle /-t͡səɾ/ regularly transforming into /-l-/, it is noticeable that vowels are not treated discriminately, but are counted in order as much as consonants; instead, secondary  particles such as the ''ya-'' and ''-(c)ar'' in ''yammuhar'' are counted last and even neglected.
-Another special class of triconsonantal roots is the one containing those influenced by the [[Pangaean Code]]. This class may either be secluded to abstract ideas or actions, or rarely include the borrowing of proper lexicon (e.g. ''-q-h-f-'' "animalism" in Adamic being from ''uħihu'' "animal" in Pangaean, rather than ''au'' "animal" in Diluvian). [...]
+Another special class of triconsonantal roots is the one containing those influenced by the [[Pangaean Code]]. This class may either be secluded to abstract ideas or actions, or rarely include the borrowing of proper lexicon (e.g. ''-q-h-f-'' "animalism" in Adamic being from ''uħihu'' "animal" in Pangaean, rather than ''au'' "animal" in Diluvian). Diluvian influence is only relevant through phonological filters, which operate under other constraints, such as the medial member of a combination often being reserved to a glottal stop, and an epenthetic ''-r-'' being added in the third position of a primordial construction.
+: ''n̠'' "ancientness" [Pangaean] ⇒ ''kna'' "ancientness" [Diluvian] ⇒ ''-k-’-n-'' "aging" [Adamic]
+: ''p'' "bearing" [Pangaean] ⇒ ''pa'' "bearing" [Diluvian] ⇒ ''-p-’-r-'' "bearing" [Adamic]
+: [...]
-Diluvian influence is still relevant through phonological filters... the medial member of a combination is often reserved to a glottal stop, and if able, ''r'' is added in the third position to mark it as a primordial construction.
+Other functionalities of triconsonantal roots include fusion, wherein the possessed element has the first member conserved and the second and third erased, while the possessive element has merely the medial member erased.
-: ''n̠'' "ancientness" [Pangaean] = ''kna'' "ancientness" [Diluvian] > ''-k-’-n-'' "aging" [Adamic]
+: ''-q-h-f-'' "animalism" + ''-p-’-r-'' "bearing" = ''-q-p-r-'' "ensnaring
-: ''p'' "bearing" [Pangaean] = ''pa'' "bearing" [Diluvian] > ''-p-’-r-'' "bearing" [Adamic]
+====Nouns====
-Fusion
-Furthermore, roots possess the property of fusion, wherein the possessed element has the first member conserved and the second and third erased, while the possessive element has merely the medial member erased.
-: ''-q-h-f-'' "animalism" + ''-p-’-r-'' "bearing" = ''-q-p-r-'' "ensnaring
 The Adamic Code mostly functions through patterns, or the configuration of vowels into the very structures of consonantal roots. There can be nominal (''-/-/-/-'', ''-/-/-/'', ''/-/-/-'', ''/-//'', ''//-/'',), positional (''/-/'', ''-//'', ''//-'', ''-/-'', ''/--'', ''--/''), verbal (''/-//-'', ''-/-//'', ''-//-/'', ''//-/-'', ''-///-'', ''/-/-/'', ''-/-/'', ''/-/-'').
@@ Line 883: / Line 881: @@
   while definition is dropped in pronouns.  The result is 108 permutations known to reduce grammatical functions thanks to a trio of particles (''i'', ''u'', and ''a'') specialized in capturing meaning. Vide:
-====Nouns====