Adamic Code: Difference between revisions

Line 821:

In the sample above, the process involving the triliteration of Diluvian words is particular. Besides basic sound changes, such as the laryngeal following the currents /h/ > /h/ and /ħ/ > /ɦ/ (not /h/ in this case), or the particle /-t͡səɾ/ regularly transforming into /-l-/, it is noticeable that vowels are not treated discriminately, but are counted in order as much as consonants; instead, secondary particles such as the ''ya-'' and ''-(c)ar'' in ''yammuhar'' are counted last and even neglected.

Another special class of triconsonantal roots is the one containing those influenced by the [[Pangaean Code]]. This class may either secluded to abstract ideas or actions, or rarely include the borrowing proper lexicon (e.g. ''-q-h-f-'' "animalism" in Adamic being from''uħihu'' "animal" in Pangaean, rather than ''au'' "animal" in Diluvian). [...]

Another special class of triconsonantal roots is the one containing those influenced by the [[Pangaean Code]]. This class may either be secluded to abstract ideas or actions, or rarely include the borrowing of proper lexicon (e.g. ''-q-h-f-'' "animalism" in Adamic being from ''uħihu'' "animal" in Pangaean, rather than ''au'' "animal" in Diluvian). [...]

~~After~~ Diluvian filters ~~are applied,~~ the medial member of a combination is often reserved to a glottal stop, and if able, ''r'' is added in the third position to mark it as a primordial construction.

Diluvian influence is still relevant through phonological filters... the medial member of a combination is often reserved to a glottal stop, and if able, ''r'' is added in the third position to mark it as a primordial construction.

: ''n̠'' "ancientness" [Pangaean] = ''kna'' "ancientness" [Diluvian] > ''-k-’-n-'' "aging" [Adamic]

Line 831:

Line 832:

: ''p'' "bearing" [Pangaean] = ''pa'' "bearing" [Diluvian] > ''-p-’-r-'' "bearing" [Adamic]

~~: ''uħihu'' "animal" [Pangaean] = ''au'' "animal" [Diluvian] > ''-q-h-f-'' "animalism" [Adamic]~~

@@ Line 821: / Line 821: @@
 In the sample above, the process involving the triliteration of Diluvian words is particular. Besides basic sound changes, such as the laryngeal following the currents /h/ > /h/ and /ħ/ > /ɦ/ (not /h/ in this case), or the particle /-t͡səɾ/ regularly transforming into /-l-/, it is noticeable that vowels are not treated discriminately, but are counted in order as much as consonants; instead, secondary  particles such as the ''ya-'' and ''-(c)ar'' in ''yammuhar'' are counted last and even neglected.
-Another special class of triconsonantal roots is the one containing those influenced by the [[Pangaean Code]]. This class may either secluded to abstract ideas or actions, or rarely include the borrowing proper lexicon (e.g. ''-q-h-f-'' "animalism" in Adamic being from''uħihu'' "animal" in Pangaean, rather than ''au'' "animal" in Diluvian). [...]
+Another special class of triconsonantal roots is the one containing those influenced by the [[Pangaean Code]]. This class may either be secluded to abstract ideas or actions, or rarely include the borrowing of proper lexicon (e.g. ''-q-h-f-'' "animalism" in Adamic being from ''uħihu'' "animal" in Pangaean, rather than ''au'' "animal" in Diluvian). [...]
- After Diluvian filters are applied, the medial member of a combination is often reserved to a glottal stop, and if able, ''r'' is added in the third position to mark it as a primordial construction.
+Diluvian influence is still relevant through phonological filters... the medial member of a combination is often reserved to a glottal stop, and if able, ''r'' is added in the third position to mark it as a primordial construction.
 : ''n̠'' "ancientness" [Pangaean] = ''kna'' "ancientness" [Diluvian] > ''-k-’-n-'' "aging" [Adamic]
@@ Line 831: / Line 832: @@
 : ''p'' "bearing" [Pangaean] = ''pa'' "bearing" [Diluvian] > ''-p-’-r-'' "bearing" [Adamic]
-: ''uħihu'' "animal" [Pangaean] = ''au'' "animal" [Diluvian] > ''-q-h-f-'' "animalism" [Adamic]