Verse:Irta/Modern Hebrew: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
* Vowels: /i e ɛ a QG QQ o u (shva na) ḤP ḤS ḤQ/ = [i e̞ e̞ æ~a ɑ~ɒ~ʌ o o u Ø~e̞ æ e̞ o̞] | * Vowels: /i e ɛ a QG QQ o u (shva na) ḤP ḤS ḤQ/ = [i e̞ e̞ æ~a ɑ~ɒ~ʌ o o u Ø~e̞ æ e̞ o̞] | ||
* /r/ is alveolar or retroflex and usually an approximant. | * /r/ is alveolar or retroflex and usually an approximant. | ||
* tav~tet /t̪ʰ/ and dalet /d̪/ have postvocalic allophones [θ] and [ð] (which don't correspond to dagesh) | * tav~tet /t̪ʰ/ and dalet /d̪/ have postvocalic allophones [θ] and [ð] (which don't correspond to lack of dagesh) | ||
* Irta Modern Hebrew pronounces he mappiq (final /h/) and doesn't have the /-ɑh/ > /-hɑ/ metathesis like our Israeli Hebrew. | * Irta Modern Hebrew pronounces he mappiq (final /h/) and doesn't have the /-ɑh/ > /-hɑ/ metathesis like our Israeli Hebrew. | ||
* ''Really'' snobby prescriptivists would insist that leniting dageshed tav, tet or dageshed dalet is incorrect, but basically no one would actually succeed at the "correct" pronunciation; they'd at best fail to lenite (which is like our Israeli Hebrew). | * ''Really'' snobby prescriptivists would insist that leniting dageshed tav, tet or dageshed dalet is incorrect, but basically no one would actually succeed at the "correct" pronunciation; they'd at best fail to lenite (which is like our Israeli Hebrew). | ||