Verse:Irta/Judeo-Mandarin: Difference between revisions

Line 394:

* răv e ney = jussive pfv.

*~~Present~~: ''to e ăg ith'' = he eats; he is eating

*''To'' is most often used for the constructions: ''to e ăg ith'' = he eats; he is eating and ''to șe ney ith'' = he ate/has eaten.

**''vel șe...'' = does he...?

** pres. interr. ''vel e...'' = does he...?

**''chan el șe...'' = he does not...

** pres. neg. ''chan el e...'' = he does not...

**''nach el șe...'' = doesn't he...?

** pres. neg. interr. ''nach el e...'' = doesn't he...?

**''gu vel e...'' = (says/believes/hopes...) that he...

** pres. comp. ''gu vel/gvel e...'' = (says/believes/hopes...) that he...

**''gu nach e...'' = (says/believes/hopes...) that he does not/did not...

** pres. comp. neg. ''gu nach e...'' = (says/believes/hopes...) that he does not/did not...

**''a h-e...'' = that he... (אַ ''a'' triggers h-prothesis, it's from ''*āh'' < ''*a tha'')

** pres. rel. (head != subject) ''a h-e...'' = that he... (אַ ''a'' triggers h-prothesis, it's from ''*āh'' < ''*a tha'')

**''a h-...'' = that is...

** pres. rel. (head == subject) ''a h-...'' = that is...

**''~~afíli~~ mă to~~/mă nach~~'' = ~~even~~ if

** pres. rel. neg. (head != subject) ''ă nach el e...'' = that is...

*''~~to șe ney ith~~'' = he ~~ate/has eaten~~

** pres. rel. neg. (head == subject) ''ă nach el ...'' = that is...

*Future: ''bey ș' ăg ith'' = he will eat

** pres. cond. ''mă to e...'' = if he...

** pres. cond. neg. ''mă nach el e...'' if he doesn't...

*Future: ''bey e ăg ith'' = he will eat

**''ă bey șe...'' = will he...?

**''cha bhey șe...'' = he will not...

Line 414:

Line 416:

**''nach răv șe...'' = was he not...?/would he not...?

* "if": ''mă to'' (pres aff), ''mă nach el'' (pres neg), ''mă vă'' (past aff), ''mă nach răv'' (past neg), ''mă bis'' (fut aff), ''mă nach bis'' (fut neg)

**''afíli mă to/mă nach'' = even if

** דאָז ''doz'' 'then' can be used for the apodosis.

*''ith!'' = Eat! (2sg)

@@ Line 394: / Line 394: @@
 * răv e ney = jussive pfv.
-*Present: ''to e ăg ith'' = he eats; he is eating
+*''To'' is most often used for the constructions: ''to e ăg ith'' = he eats; he is eating and ''to șe ney ith'' = he ate/has eaten.
-**''vel șe...'' = does he...?
+** pres. interr. ''vel e...'' = does he...?
-**''chan el șe...'' = he does not...
+** pres. neg. ''chan el e...'' = he does not...
-**''nach el șe...'' = doesn't he...?
+** pres. neg. interr. ''nach el e...'' = doesn't he...?
-**''gu vel e...'' = (says/believes/hopes...) that he...
+** pres. comp. ''gu vel/gvel e...'' = (says/believes/hopes...) that he...
-**''gu nach e...'' = (says/believes/hopes...) that he does not/did not...
+** pres. comp. neg. ''gu nach e...'' = (says/believes/hopes...) that he does not/did not...
-**''a h-e...'' = that he... (אַ ''a'' triggers h-prothesis, it's from ''*āh'' < ''*a tha'')
+** pres. rel. (head != subject) ''a h-e...'' = that he... (אַ ''a'' triggers h-prothesis, it's from ''*āh'' < ''*a tha'')
-**''a h-...'' = that is...
+** pres. rel. (head == subject) ''a h-...'' = that is...
-**''afíli mă to/mă nach'' = even if
+** pres. rel. neg. (head != subject) ''ă nach el e...'' = that is...
-*''to șe ney ith'' = he ate/has eaten
+** pres. rel. neg. (head == subject) ''ă nach el ...'' = that is...
-*Future: ''bey ș' ăg ith'' = he will eat
+** pres. cond. ''mă to e...'' = if he...
+** pres. cond. neg. ''mă nach el e...'' if he doesn't...
+*Future: ''bey e ăg ith'' = he will eat
 **''ă bey șe...'' = will he...?
 **''cha bhey șe...'' = he will not...
@@ Line 414: / Line 416: @@
 **''nach răv șe...'' = was he not...?/would he not...?
 * "if": ''mă to'' (pres aff), ''mă nach el'' (pres neg), ''mă vă'' (past aff), ''mă nach răv'' (past neg), ''mă bis'' (fut aff), ''mă nach bis'' (fut neg)
+**''afíli mă to/mă nach'' = even if
 ** דאָז ''doz'' 'then' can be used for the apodosis.
 *''ith!'' = Eat! (2sg)