Minhast: Difference between revisions

Line 1,745:

In comparison to the transitive pronominal affixes, the affixes for the intransitive verb are much simpler, although the passive forms demonstrate quite a bit of unexpected variability. Most noticeable in the passive forms is the occurrence of lenition, a morphophonemic alternation that occurs nowhere else in the Minhast verb, or nouns for that matter. Moreover, the passive forms show considerable polysemy. Diachronic developments explain the source for these otherwise aberrant features. These developments can be found in [[Minhast/Diachronic_Changes]]

In comparison to the transitive pronominal affixes, the affixes for the intransitive verb are much simpler. The forms of the Absolutive are listed below in the following table:

~~The forms of the Absolutive and the Passive are listed below in Table X:~~

Line 1,754:

Line 1,752:

! Person

! Absolutive

~~! Passive~~

|-

! style="text-align:left"| 1st Sg.

| -k-

~~| -x-~~

|-

! style="text-align:left"| 2nd Sg.

| -ta-

~~| -šš-~~

|-

! style="text-align:left"| 3rd Masculine - Common Sg.

| -Ø-

~~| rowspan="2" |-yy-~~

|-

! style="text-align:left"| 3rd Feminine Sg.

Line 1,773:

Line 1,767:

! style="text-align:left"| 3rd Neuter Animate Sg.

| -Ø-, -s-

~~| -šš-~~

|-

! style="text-align:left"| 3rd Neuter Inanimate Sg.

| -m-

~~| -yy-~~

|-

! style="text-align:left"| 1st Plural Inclusive

| -hak-

~~| -hax-~~

|-

! style="text-align:left"| 1st Pl Exclusive

| -mm-

~~| -yy-~~

|-

! style="text-align:left"| 2nd Pl.

| -tam-

~~| -tayy-~~

|-

! style="text-align:left"| 3rd Common Pl.

| -km-

~~| -x-~~

|-

! style="text-align:left"| 3rd Neut. Anim. Pl.

| -i-

~~| rowspan="2" | -yy-~~

|-

! style="text-align:left"| 3rd Neut. Inanim Pl.

@@ Line 1,745: / Line 1,745: @@
 {{Minhast_Portmanteau_Pronominal_Affixes2}}
-In comparison to the transitive pronominal affixes, the affixes for the intransitive verb are much simpler, although the passive forms demonstrate quite a bit of unexpected variability.  Most noticeable in the passive forms is the occurrence of lenition, a morphophonemic alternation that occurs nowhere else in the Minhast verb, or nouns for that matter.  Moreover, the passive forms show considerable polysemy.  Diachronic developments explain the source for these otherwise aberrant features.  These developments can be found in [[Minhast/Diachronic_Changes]]
+In comparison to the transitive pronominal affixes, the affixes for the intransitive verb are much simpler.  The forms of the Absolutive are listed below in the following table: <!--, although the passive forms demonstrate quite a bit of unexpected variability.  Most noticeable in the passive forms is the occurrence of lenition, a morphophonemic alternation that occurs nowhere else in the Minhast verb, or nouns for that matter.  Moreover, the passive forms show considerable polysemy.  Diachronic developments explain the source for these otherwise aberrant features.  These developments can be found in [[Minhast/Diachronic_Changes]]-->
-The forms of the Absolutive and the Passive are listed below in Table X:
 <br/><br/>
@@ Line 1,754: / Line 1,752: @@
 ! Person
 ! Absolutive
-! Passive
 |-
 ! style="text-align:left"|   1st Sg.
 | -k-
-| -x-
 |-
 ! style="text-align:left"|   2nd Sg.
 | -ta-
-| -šš-
 |-
 ! style="text-align:left"|   3rd Masculine - Common Sg.
 | -Ø-
-| rowspan="2" |-yy-
 |-
 ! style="text-align:left"|   3rd Feminine Sg.
@@ Line 1,773: / Line 1,767: @@
 ! style="text-align:left"|   3rd Neuter Animate Sg.
 | -Ø-, -s-
-| -šš-
 |-
 ! style="text-align:left"|   3rd Neuter Inanimate Sg.
 | -m-
-| -yy-
-|-
 |-
 ! style="text-align:left"|   1st Plural Inclusive
 | -hak-
-| -hax-
 |-
 ! style="text-align:left"|   1st Pl Exclusive
 | -mm-
-| -yy-
 |-
 ! style="text-align:left"|   2nd Pl.
 | -tam-
-| -tayy-
 |-
 ! style="text-align:left"|  3rd Common Pl.
 | -km-
-| -x-
 |-
 ! style="text-align:left"|   3rd Neut. Anim. Pl.
 | -i-
-| rowspan="2" | -yy-
 |-
 ! style="text-align:left"|   3rd Neut. Inanim Pl.