Azalic: Difference between revisions

IlL (talk | contribs)
IlL (talk | contribs)
Line 148: Line 148:
*Nonpast(the source of the English present): e-grade or otherwise the unmarked form of the verb
*Nonpast(the source of the English present): e-grade or otherwise the unmarked form of the verb
*Past: PIE reduplicated perfect or root aorist
*Past: PIE reduplicated perfect or root aorist
*Irrealis (source of subjunctive ''were'' in English): sigmatic future
*Irrealis (source of the English subjunctive, including the subjunctive ''were''): sigmatic future
*Stative (the source of the English past): a tenseless form like the Akkadian stative. Originally a deverbal noun; formed with the o-grade (deriving nouns in PIE) for strongs, -d from -tús for weaks, -(i) from -ih2 for semistrongs. It was not a true finite verb form so it didn't take ''-swe''.
*Stative (the source of the English past): a tenseless form like the Akkadian stative. Originally a deverbal noun; formed with the o-grade (deriving nouns in PIE) for strongs, -d from -tús for weaks, -(i) from -ih2 for semistrongs. It was not a true finite verb form so it didn't take ''-swe''.
*Active participle: -ənt
*Active participle: -ənt
Line 170: Line 170:
|-
|-
! Irrealis
! Irrealis
| ''luṗəṡə(-se), luṗəh(-se)'' || ''bhendhəṡə(-se), bhendhəh(-se)'' || ''choldhəṡə(-se), choldhəh(-se)''
| ''luṗəṡə, luṗəh'' || ''bhendhəṡə, bhendhəh'' || ''choldhəṡə, choldhəh''
|-
|-
! Stative
! Stative