Aryan: Difference between revisions
| (100 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
{{Construction}} | {{Construction}} | ||
'''Aryan''' (''* | '''Aryan''' (''*Ai̯ri̯áh<sub>0</sub>'', [[w:Help:IPA|[əi̯ˈri̯əʔ]]]), also referred to as '''Pre-Proto-Indo-European,''' is an [[ab interiori language]] depicting the transition from [[Paleolithic Codes]] to [[w:Proto-Indo-European language|Proto-Indo-European]] (PIE). There are no historical records of its existence, or comparative data to support it; rather, it is an abductive experiment based on the hypothesis of [[Transitional Dialects]]. | ||
In most of known [[w:History|History]], indo-european speaking populations have been widespread in [[w:Eurasia|Eurasia]], bearing fruits from civilizations such as those of the [[w:Roman empire|Roman Empire]], the [[w:Ancient Greece|Hellenistic City-States]], and the [[w:List of ancient Indo-Aryan peoples and tribes|Rigvedic Tribes]]. Memorable personalities who spoke natively dialects from those areas include the roman general [[w:Gaius Julius Caesar|Julius Caesar]] (speaker of [[w:Latin|Latin]]), the macedonian king [[w:Alexander the Great|Alexander the Great]] (speaker of [[w:Ancient Greek|Ancient Greek]]), the nazi chancellor [[w:Adolf Hitler|Adolf Hitler]] (speaker of [[w:German language|German]]), the french emperor [[w:Napoleon Bonaparte|Napoleon Bonaparte]] (speaker of [[w:Corsican langugae|Corsican]]), the british physicist [[w:Isaac Newton|Isaac Newton]] (speaker of [[w:English language|English]]), the italian renascentist [[w:Leonardo da Vinci|Leoanardo da Vinci]] (speaker of [[w:Tuscan dialect|Tuscan Italian]]), the indian ascetic [[w:Gautama Buddha|Gautama Buddha]] (speaker of [[w:Prakrit language|Prakrit]]), et cetera. Also, due the trajectory of the linguistic stock along the millenia, some of the most culturally influential works of Literature have been yielded, such as the [[w:Vulgate|Vulgate]], the [[w:Iliad|Iliad]], and the [[w:Vedas|Vedas]]. As of the [[w:21st Century|21<sup>st</sup> Century]], half of the world's population speaks 454 indo-european languages<ref>https://www.ethnologue.com/</ref>, with the [[w:Americas|Americas]], [[w:Europe|Europe]], [[w:Iran|Iran]], [[w:Pakistan|Pakistan]], and [[w:India|India]] being today the centers of native speakers due the [[w:Indo-European migrations|Indo-European Migrations]] and [[w:Colonial empires|European Colonialism]]. | In most of known [[w:History|History]], indo-european speaking populations have been widespread in [[w:Eurasia|Eurasia]], bearing fruits from civilizations such as those of the [[w:Roman empire|Roman Empire]], the [[w:Ancient Greece|Hellenistic City-States]], and the [[w:List of ancient Indo-Aryan peoples and tribes|Rigvedic Tribes]]. Memorable personalities who spoke natively dialects from those areas include the roman general [[w:Gaius Julius Caesar|Julius Caesar]] (speaker of [[w:Latin|Latin]]), the macedonian king [[w:Alexander the Great|Alexander the Great]] (speaker of [[w:Ancient Greek|Ancient Greek]]), the nazi chancellor [[w:Adolf Hitler|Adolf Hitler]] (speaker of [[w:German language|German]]), the french emperor [[w:Napoleon Bonaparte|Napoleon Bonaparte]] (speaker of [[w:Corsican langugae|Corsican]]), the british physicist [[w:Isaac Newton|Isaac Newton]] (speaker of [[w:English language|English]]), the italian renascentist [[w:Leonardo da Vinci|Leoanardo da Vinci]] (speaker of [[w:Tuscan dialect|Tuscan Italian]]), the indian ascetic [[w:Gautama Buddha|Gautama Buddha]] (speaker of [[w:Prakrit language|Prakrit]]), et cetera. Also, due the trajectory of the linguistic stock along the millenia, some of the most culturally influential works of Literature have been yielded, such as the [[w:Vulgate|Vulgate]], the [[w:Iliad|Iliad]], and the [[w:Vedas|Vedas]]. As of the [[w:21st Century|21<sup>st</sup> Century]], half of the world's population speaks 454 indo-european languages<ref>https://www.ethnologue.com/</ref>, with the [[w:Americas|Americas]], [[w:Europe|Europe]], [[w:Iran|Iran]], [[w:Pakistan|Pakistan]], and [[w:India|India]] being today the centers of native speakers due the [[w:Indo-European migrations|Indo-European Migrations]] and [[w:Colonial empires|European Colonialism]]. | ||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
Naturally, the origin of the [[w:Indo-European languages|indo-european family]] has attracted the curiosity of thousands of researchers in the last centuries, since [[w:William Jones (philologist)|William Jones']] presidential discourse to the Asiatic Society in 1786<ref>https://www.britannica.com/topic/Sanskrit-language</ref>, which famously addressed the similarity between [[w:Sanskrit|Sanskrit]] and [[w:Languages of Europe|european languages]]. '''Further works that [...]''' | Naturally, the origin of the [[w:Indo-European languages|indo-european family]] has attracted the curiosity of thousands of researchers in the last centuries, since [[w:William Jones (philologist)|William Jones']] presidential discourse to the Asiatic Society in 1786<ref>https://www.britannica.com/topic/Sanskrit-language</ref>, which famously addressed the similarity between [[w:Sanskrit|Sanskrit]] and [[w:Languages of Europe|european languages]]. '''Further works that [...]''' | ||
In the hybrid model, Aryan must have been spoken somewhere near the Caucasus Mountains in compliance with the [[w:Armenian hypothesis|Armenian Hypothesis]], which in its current form holds that the speakers of "Pre-Proto-Indo-European" pertained to the genepool of the [[w:Caucasus hunter-gatherer|Caucasian Hunter-Gatherers]] (CHG)<ref name= | In the hybrid model, Aryan must have been spoken somewhere near the Caucasus Mountains in compliance with the [[w:Armenian hypothesis|Armenian Hypothesis]], which in its current form holds that the speakers of "Pre-Proto-Indo-European" pertained to the genepool of the [[w:Caucasus hunter-gatherer|Caucasian Hunter-Gatherers]] (CHG)<ref name=Lazaridis>Lazaridis et alii (2022); ''The genetic history of the Southern Arc: a bridge between West Asia and Europe''</ref>, who would eventually contribute to the formation of the [[w:Yamnaya culture|Yamnaya Culture]] and the dispersion of "Core Proto-Indo-European" as detailed in the [[w:Kurgan hypothesis|Kurgan Hypothesis]]. The age of the language is more controversial, being set between 12,000 and 10,000 years Before Present (BP), or the double of its daughter-language's, to coincide with the notion of [[Linguistic Modernity]]. | ||
==Etymology== | |||
The word ''*Ai̯ri̯áh<sub>0</sub>'' is influenced but not based on the Indo-Iranian ethnonym ''*Áryas'' "Aryan", as the root ''*h<sub>5</sub>ir'' "member/comrade" comes from Pangaean ''ʕihr'' "racial person". | |||
==History== | ==History== | ||
===Development from Paleolithic Codes=== | ===Development from Paleolithic Codes=== | ||
The | The story of Aryan starts with the transition from Atomism to Double Articulation, or from the [[Pangaean Code]] to Neolithic dialects (circa 12,000 BP). Noticeable is the influence of the [[Diluvian Code|Diluvian]] and [[Hyperborean Code|Hyperborean]] Codes, which triggered several sound changes: | ||
*Weak (plosive) stops become aspirated/murmured preceding a laryngeal consonant, as strong (ejective/implosive) stops gain plosive qualities in the same position.<br> | *Weak (plosive) stops become aspirated/murmured preceding a laryngeal consonant, as strong (ejective/implosive) stops gain plosive qualities in the same position.<br> | ||
| Line 324: | Line 327: | ||
|''*wid-rás'' "aquatic" | |''*wid-rás'' "aquatic" | ||
|''*ud-rós'' "aquatic" | |''*ud-rós'' "aquatic" | ||
|- | |- | ||
|''ˈkhuħ-ə'' "sound" | |''ˈkhuħ-ə'' "sound" | ||
| Line 342: | Line 337: | ||
|} | |} | ||
===Development into Indo-European Languages=== | ===Development into Indo-European Languages [...]=== | ||
Some tendences include the aspirated velars of Aryan becoming the PIE palatal series (*Kʰ ⇒ *Ḱ); .... | |||
https://en.wiktionary.org/w/index.php?title=Category:Proto-Indo-European_roots&from=A | |||
*bʰeyh₂- | |||
{| class="wikitable" | {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;" | ||
!Codex | !Codex | ||
!Aryan | !Aryan | ||
| Line 354: | Line 353: | ||
| k̠- | | k̠- | ||
| *kʰpʰ- | | *kʰpʰ- | ||
| *ǵʰ | | *ǵʰ-d | ||
| | | 1. [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/ǵʰewd-|''*ǵʰewd-'']] "to pour", [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/ǵʰed-|''*ǵʰed-'']] "to defecate", [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/ḱh₂d-|''*ḱh₂d-'']] "to fall" | ||
|- | |- | ||
| -k̠ | | -k̠ | ||
| *-kp | | *-kp | ||
| | | *-k<sup>w</sup> | ||
| | | 1. [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/leykʷ-|''*leykʷ-'']] "to leave" | ||
|- | |- | ||
| k- | | k- | ||
| *kʰ- | | *kʰ- | ||
| *ḱ | | *ḱ | ||
| | | 1. [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/ḱe|''*ḱe'']] "this" | ||
|- | |- | ||
| -k | | -k | ||
| Line 374: | Line 373: | ||
| k̟- | | k̟- | ||
| *kʰtʰ- | | *kʰtʰ- | ||
| *ḱ | | *ḱ-s | ||
| | | 1. [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/(s)ker-|''*(s)ker-'']], [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/(s)kelH-|''*(s)kelH'']], [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/sek-|''*sek-'']], [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/ḱes-|''*ḱes-'']], [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/kh₂eyd-|''*kh₂eyd-'']] "to cut"; 3. [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/gleyH-|''*gleyH-'']] "to stick", [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/bʰreyH-|''*bʰreyH-'']] "to cut" | ||
|- | |- | ||
| -k̟ | | -k̟ | ||
| -kt | | *-kt | ||
| *ḱ | | *p-ḱ | ||
| | | 1. [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/peh₂ḱ-|''*peh₂ḱ-'']] "to join", [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/peh₂ǵ-|''*peh₂ǵ-'']] "to attach"; 2. [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/leyp-|''*leyp-'']] "to stick", [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/leyǵ-|''*leyǵ-'']] "to bind"; 3. [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/bʰendʰ-|''*bʰendʰ-'']] "to bind", [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/deh₁-|''*deh₁-'']] "to bind" | ||
|- | |- | ||
| g̠- | | g̠- | ||
| *gʰbʰ- | | *gʰbʰ- | ||
| *gʰ | | *gʰ-bʰ | ||
| | | 1. [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/(s)pregʰ-|''*(s)pregʰ-'']] "sprinkle", [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/glewbʰ-|''*glewbʰ-'']] "split", [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/bʰeh₂g-|''*bʰeh₂g-'']] "to divide"; 3. [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/bʰeyd-|''*bʰeyd-'']] "to split", [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/deh₂-|''*deh₂-'']] "to divide" | ||
|- | |- | ||
| -g̠ | | -g̠ | ||
| -gb | |||
| | | | ||
| | | *h₁éǵʰ "out" | ||
|- | |- | ||
| g- | | g- | ||
| Line 404: | Line 403: | ||
| g̟- | | g̟- | ||
| *gʰdʰ- | | *gʰdʰ- | ||
| *gʰ | | *gʰ-dʰ | ||
| '' | | [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/gʰedʰ-|''*gʰedʰ-'']] "to join", [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/bʰendʰ-|''*bʰendʰ-'']] "to bind" | ||
|- | |- | ||
| -g̟ | | -g̟ | ||
| Line 414: | Line 413: | ||
| k̠ʼ- | | k̠ʼ- | ||
| *kp- | | *kp- | ||
| *g | | *bʰ-g, *k-p | ||
| | | [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/bʰeg-|''*bʰeg-'']] "break", [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/bʰreg-|''*bʰreg-'']] "break", [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/bʰrew-|''*bʰrew-'']] "break", [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/bʰrews-|''*bʰrews-'']] "break", [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/kelh₂-|''*kelh₂-'']] "break", [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/(s)kep-|''*(s)kep-'']] "break", [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/Hrewp-|''*Hrewp-'']] "break" [may be from [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/Hrew-|''*Hrew-'']] "tear out"] | ||
|- | |- | ||
| -k̠ʼ | | -k̠ʼ | ||
| *-kʰpʰ | | *-kʰpʰ | ||
| *ǵ | | *w-ǵ | ||
| | | ''*lewǵ-'' ~ ''*weh₂ǵ-'' ~ ''*wreh₁ǵ-'' "to break" | ||
|- | |- | ||
| kʼ- | | kʼ- | ||
| Line 473: | Line 472: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| p̠- | | p̠- | ||
| | | *pʰtʰ- | ||
| | | *bʰ/gʷ | ||
| | | [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/bʰegʷ-|''*bʰegʷ-'']] "flee", [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/bʰewg-|''*bʰewg-'']] "flee" | ||
|- | |- | ||
| -p̠ | | -p̠ | ||
| Line 483: | Line 482: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| p- | | p- | ||
| *pʰ | | *pʰ- | ||
| *bʰ | | *bʰ- | ||
| | | [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/bʰer-|''*bʰer-'']] "bear" | ||
|- | |- | ||
| -p | | -p | ||
| Line 535: | Line 534: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| p̠ʼ- | | p̠ʼ- | ||
| *pt- | |||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| -p̠ʼ | | -p̠ʼ | ||
| | | *-pʰtʰ | ||
| | | *bʰ-dʰ | ||
| | | [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/bʰedʰ-|''*bʰedʰ-'']] "dig" | ||
|- | |- | ||
| pʼ- | | pʼ- | ||
| *p- | | *p- | ||
| *p | | *p | ||
| | | [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/per-|''*per-'']] "go through", [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/pel-|''*pel-'']] "drive", [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/pent-|''*pent-'']] "pass", [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/pes-|''*pes-'']] "penis" | ||
|- | |- | ||
| -pʼ | | -pʼ | ||
| | | *-pʰ | ||
| | | *bʰ | ||
| | | [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/bʰerH-|''*bʰerH-'']] "pierce" | ||
|- | |- | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Line 587: | Line 586: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| ɓ̟- | | ɓ̟- | ||
| | | *bʰ- | ||
| | | *bʰ | ||
| | | [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/bʰed-|''*bʰed-'']] "improve" | ||
|- | |- | ||
| -ɓ̟ | | -ɓ̟ | ||
| Line 717: | Line 716: | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| | |- | ||
| ʘ̠- | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|- | |||
| -ʘ̠ | |||
: * | | | ||
| | |||
: * | | | ||
|- | |||
| ʘ- | |||
| *dʷ- | |||
| *bʰ- | |||
| [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/bʰed-|''*bʰed-'']] "improve", [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/bʰil-|''*bʰil-'']] "lovely" | |||
|- | |||
| -ʘ | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|- | |||
| ʘ̟- | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|- | |||
| -ʘ̟ | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|- | |||
| ǀ̠- | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|- | |||
| -ǀ̠ | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|- | |||
| ǀ- | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|- | |||
| -ǀ | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/bʰeyh₂-|''*bʰeyh₂-'']] "to shake" | |||
|- | |||
| ǀ̟- | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|- | |||
| -ǀ̟ | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|- | |||
| r- | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| 3. [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/bʰuH-|''*bʰuH-'']] "to be" | |||
|- | |||
| -r | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|} | |||
: * | [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/bʰerǵʰ-|''*bʰerǵʰ-'']] "ascend" | ||
: *bʰegʷ- "to flee" < *-pʰtʰ "to escape" < … | |||
: *bʰerǵʰ- "to rise up " < *pk- "to eject" (?) | |||
: *bʰil "good" < *dʷih<sub>1</sub> | |||
[[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/ǵʰes-|''*ǵʰes-'']] "hand", [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/ǵʰey-|''*ǵʰey-'']] "winter" (earlier lexical transition from "autumn", with similar use of English "fall"), | |||
[[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/gʷʰer-|''*gʷʰer-'']] "warm" [from ''*gʰbʰōr-'' "glow"], [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/bʰeh₃g-|''*bʰeh₃g-'']] "bake/roast" [from ''*gʰbʰor-'' "kindle"] | |||
daik "to take" (*deḱ) | *temh<sub>1</sub> | ||
kpih1 > bʰeg-; h5ikʰpʰ > weh2ǵ- ∅ | |||
r is added when the laryngeal is modified (h2 > h1) | |||
l is added when the laryngeal is erased (h1 > ∅) | |||
∅ (H) > r (H̥) > l (∅) | |||
*bʰewdʰ “to be awake” | |||
: *bʰeyd ~ *delh<sub>1</sub> “to split” | |||
: *deh<sub>2</sub>y- ~ *bʰeh<sub>2</sub>g- "to divide" | |||
: *deh<sub>3</sub> "to give" | |||
‘’’D lemmas’’’ | |||
dewh1 (*deh3) | |||
> | |||
daim "to build" (*dem) | |||
daik "to take" (*deḱ) | |||
daipʰkʰ "to lead" (*dewk) | daipʰkʰ "to lead" (*dewk) | ||
| Line 2,492: | Line 2,564: | ||
==Historical and Geographical Distribution== | ==Historical and Geographical Distribution== | ||
Since Lazaridis et al's paper<ref name= | Since Lazaridis et al's paper<ref name=Lazaridis>Lazaridis et alii (2022); ''The genetic history of the Southern Arc: a bridge between West Asia and Europe''</ref>, absence of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eastern%20hunter-gatherer Eastern European Hunter-Gatherer] (EHG) ancestry in the Anatolian component of the Indo-European speaking populations has suggested a caucasian homeleand for earlier stages of PIE rather than a pre-Yamnaya pontic continuance. Recent studies<ref>Brami (2019), ''Anatolia: from the origins of agriculture to the spread of Neolithic economies''</ref><ref>Ulas et al (2024), ''Drawing diffusion patterns of Neolithic agriculture in Anatolia''</ref>, furthermore, point to a total farming economy by the Zagros around 6,000 BC, which tempts an older dating for a Transitional Dialect such as Aryan. | ||
==Phonology== | ==Phonology== | ||
| Line 2,654: | Line 2,726: | ||
| | | | ||
|} | |} | ||
*The most promiment feature of the Aryan inventory is the presence of laryngeals [...] it possessess 7 in total: <''*h''><sub>0</sub> /ʔ/, <''*h''><sub>1</sub> /h/, <''*h''><sub>2</sub> /ħ/, <''*h''><sub>3</sub> /x/, <''*h''><sub>4</sub> /ɦ/, <''*h''><sub>5</sub> /ʕ/, <''*h''><sub>6</sub> /ɣ/ | |||
===Vowels=== | ===Vowels=== | ||
| Line 2,738: | Line 2,812: | ||
===Pitch Accent=== | ===Pitch Accent=== | ||
==Morphology== | ==Morphology== [...] | ||
[...] | [...] | ||
DILUVIAN PARTICLES ... -n (gen), -pʰa (dat) | |||
When inflected, lemmas become obliques (weakened). | |||
masc/fem | neut in adjectives | |||
fem masc/neut in verbs | |||
| Line 2,756: | Line 2,835: | ||
*gʷaināsay, *gʷaināmas | *gʷaināsay, *gʷaināmas | ||
Aryan | Aryan morphology deals with full-grade (_) and null-grade (∅). | ||
. | |||
Aryan ''*(á)-s'' [PIE ''*(ó)-s''] forms nouns, as in ''*p<sup>h</sup>árs'' "thief" [PIE ''*b<sup>h</sup>ṓr'' "thief"] from ''*p<sup>h</sup>air'' "bearing". | |||
Aryan ''*(_)-as'' [PIE ''*(é)-os''] forms active animate nouns, as in ''kʰúh<sub>2</sub>as'' "living sound" [PIE ''*ḱlewos'' "fame"]. If the meaning intended is "racial", furthermore, the affix becomes ''*(_)-(a)ras'' [PIE ''*(∅)-(u)ros''], as in ''h<sub>5</sub>ímsaras'' "engenderer" [PIE ''*h<sub>2</sub>ḿ̥suros'' "deity"]. | |||
Aryan ''*(∅)-ás'' [PIE ''*(e)-ós''] forms active animate adjectives, as in ... | |||
Aryan ''*(á)-as'' [PIE ''*(ó)-os''] forms passive animate nouns, as in ''*p<sup>h</sup>áras'' "what is born" [PIE ''*b<sup>h</sup>óros'' "what is brought"] | |||
Aryan ''*(a)-ás'' [PIE ''*(o)-ós''] forms passive animate adjectives, as in ... became agentive instead of passive in PIE, but some archaic forms remain, such as *gʰoysós "spear" | |||
* | Aryan ''*(_)-ar'' [PIE *([é/ó)-r̥] forms active inanimate nouns, as in ''*húdar'' "water" [PIE ''*wódr̥'' "water"] | ||
Aryan ''*(∅)-ár'' forms active inanimate adjectives. | |||
Aryan ''*(á)-ar'' forms passive inanimate nouns. | |||
===Ablaut=== | Aryan ''*(a)-ár'' forms passive inanimate adjectives. | ||
- | |||
Aryan ''*(_)-tár'' forms agent nouns. | |||
Aryan ''*(_)-tram'' forms instrument nouns. It is a fusion of ''*(_)-tár'' [agent particle] and ''*-am'' [neuter particle] | |||
Aryan ''*(∅)-C-ás'' [PIE ''*(∅)-mós''] [forms derived nouns through mobile roots] EX: ''*pʰtʰūymás'' PIE = | |||
===Root=== | |||
In Aryan, roots are either static or mobile. In the first case, they serve as a prototypical source of meaning, impossible to be further decomposed. Otherwise, further analysis is possible through pure consonantal and vocalic segments, treated as "fundamental atoms". | |||
A consonantal root is intrinsically modified by vocalic roots. | |||
*pʰair < action root *p "bearing" + class root *h5ih1 "person" + epenthetic *r | |||
===Clitic=== | |||
In Aryan, clitics, similarly to tones, became fossilized as affixes. | |||
===Ablaut=== | |||
| Line 3,061: | Line 3,150: | ||
[...] | [...] | ||
====Personal Pronouns==== | ====Personal Pronouns [...]==== | ||
[...] | |||
English, German, French, Italian, Portuguese, Russian, Persian, Latin, Greek, Sanskrit... | |||
Brugmann; Grundriss [...] ⇒ Schmidt, Stammbildung und Flexion (argues in favor of eǵ as older tham eǵom) ⇒ P. Forchheimer, The category of person in language, Berlin 1953 | |||
⇒ Benveniste, La nature des pronoms > https://www.academia.edu/1478874/Die_komplexe_Morphologie_der_urindogermanischen_Personalpronomina_draft_ | |||
Stop Borrowing! Anatolian/Indo-European Stops, Voice, and Northwest Semitic Loans – With Notes on Ugaritic grdš, ztr, dġṯ and Other Words | |||
[...] | [...] | ||
| Line 3,067: | Line 3,165: | ||
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;" | {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;" | ||
! rowspan="3" | | ! rowspan="3" | | ||
! colspan=" | ! colspan="12" | PERSONAL PRONOUN DECLENSION | ||
|- | |- | ||
! colspan="3" | Singular | ! colspan="3" | Singular | ||
! colspan="3" | Dual | ! colspan="3" | Dual | ||
! colspan="3" | Plural | ! colspan="3" | Plural | ||
! colspan="3" | Collective | |||
|- | |- | ||
! 1<sup>st</sup>-person | ! 1<sup>st</sup>-person | ||
| Line 3,077: | Line 3,176: | ||
! 3<sup>rd</sup>-person | ! 3<sup>rd</sup>-person | ||
! 1<sup>st</sup>-person | ! 1<sup>st</sup>-person | ||
! 2<sup>nd</sup>-person | |||
! 3<sup>rd</sup>-person | |||
! 1<sup>rd</sup>-person | |||
! 2<sup>nd</sup>-person | ! 2<sup>nd</sup>-person | ||
! 3<sup>rd</sup>-person | ! 3<sup>rd</sup>-person | ||
| Line 3,084: | Line 3,186: | ||
|- | |- | ||
! Nominative | ! Nominative | ||
| * | | *h<sub>5</sub>ih<sub>1</sub>ṓn || *tū́ ~ *táu || *aī́h<sub>0</sub>i<br>*aī́h<sub>0</sub><br>*aī́ts || *ōi̯ṓn || *ūi̯ū́ || *aīaī́<br>*īu̯ī́h<sub>0</sub><br>*īu̯ī́ || *ṓns || *ū́s || *aī́s<br>*ī́h<sub>0</sub>s<br>*ī́s || *ṓna || *ū́a || *aī́a<br>*ī́h<sub>0</sub>a<br>*ī́a | ||
|- | |- | ||
! Accusative | ! Accusative | ||
| *nh<sub>0</sub> || *tu̯h<sub>0</sub> || * | | *nh<sub>0</sub>(m) || *tu̯h<sub>0</sub>(m) || *im<br>*ih<sub>0</sub>m<br>*its || *noh<sub>0</sub>(m) || *i̯uh<sub>0</sub>(m) || *aim,<br>*aih<sub>0</sub>m,<br>*aits || *nsh<sub>0</sub>(m) || *u̯sh<sub>0</sub>(m) || *ism<br>*ih<sub>0</sub>sm<br>*is || *nah<sub>0</sub>(m) || *u̯ah<sub>0</sub>(m) || *iam<br>*ih<sub>0</sub>am<br>*ia | ||
|- | |- | ||
! Genitive | ! Genitive | ||
| *ni̯a || *tu̯i̯a || * | | *ni̯a || *tu̯i̯a || *itsi̯a<br>*ih<sub>0</sub>tsi̯a<br>*itsi̯a || *noi̯a || *i̯ui̯a || *aitsi̯a,<br>*aih<sub>0</sub>tsi̯a,<br>*aitsi̯a || *nsi̯a(m) || *u̯si̯a(m) || *itsi̯am<br>*ih<sub>0</sub>tsi̯am<br>*itsi̯am || *nai̯a || *u̯ai̯a || *iai̯a<br>*ih<sub>0</sub>ai̯a<br>*iai̯a | ||
|- | |- | ||
! Locative | ! Locative | ||
| *ni || *tu̯i || * | | *ni || *tu̯i || *itsi<br>*ih<sub>0</sub>tsi<br>*itsi || *noi || *i̯ui || *aitsi<br>*aih<sub>0</sub>tsi<br>*aitsi || *nsi(m) || *u̯si(m) || *itsim<br>*ih<sub>0</sub>tsim<br>*itsim || *nai || *u̯ai || *iai<br>*ih<sub>0</sub>ai<br>*iai | ||
|- | |- | ||
! Dative | ! Dative | ||
| *nai̯ || *tu̯ai̯ || * | | *nai̯ || *tu̯ai̯ || *iai̯<br>*ih<sub>0</sub>ai̯<br>*iai̯ || *noai̯ || *i̯uai̯ || *aiai̯<br>*aih<sub>0</sub>ai̯<br>*aiai̯ || *nsai̯(m) || *u̯sai̯(m) || *isai̯(m)<br>*ih<sub>0</sub>sai̯(m)<br>*isai̯(m) || *naai̯ || *u̯aai̯ || *iaai̯<br>*ih<sub>0</sub>aai̯<br>*iaai̯ | ||
|- | |- | ||
|} | |} | ||
The particle <''*m''> gains the property of the serial particle <''*s''> when the latter conflates with the | *The first-person singular ''*h<sub>5</sub>ih<sub>1</sub>ṓn'' (PIE ''*h<sub>1</sub>eǵHóm'') seems to be a descendent of the primordial form ''ˈʕih-ɔː'' "I" , which would regularly yield stress on the first syllable, yet it is observed that in PIE the consonant <''*ǵ''> appears (probably a consequence from the sound change '''*h<sub>1</sub> ⇒ *ǵ / V_V'''), plus the affixation of <''*n''>, a borrowing from Diluvian ''nao'' "this person". | ||
**In PIE, the emphatic ''*h<sub>1</sub>eǵHóm'' could be interpreted as more archaic than ''*h₁eǵH'', as Homeric Greek ''ἐγών'' and Sanskrit ''अहम्'' suggest. The emphatic particle ''*-om'' (PIE) likely arose due the contaminator <''*m''>. | |||
**The nasal in ''*h<sub>5</sub>ih<sub>1</sub>ṓn'' "I" became <''*m''> primarily due two distinct processes; one phonetic and other phonological. It was either subsequently labialized by the preceding vowel, shortening the nucleus (i.e. /oːn/ ⇒ /own/ ⇒ /om/), and/or swapped by the contaminator ''*m'' based on its inflected forms. | |||
***This sound change affected all other inflections of the first person singular (e.g. ''*nh<sub>0</sub>(m)'' "me" (A) ⇒ ''*mh<sub>0</sub>'' ~ ''*h<sub>0</sub>m'' "me" (?) ⇒ ''*me'' ~ ''*h<sub>1</sub>me'' "me" (PIE)). | |||
*The second-person singular ''*tū́'' (PIE ''*túH'') seems to be a descendent of Diluvian ''taocar'' "the person one refers to", with an unusual vocalic paradigm. If this is correct, a more conservative alternative might have been ''*táu''. | |||
**In PIE, the pronoun ''*túH'' is extremely conservative, found as ''tu'' in Latin, ''σύ'' in Greek, and ''त्वम्'' in Sanskrit, for example. In PIA, though, Hittite ''zīg'' and Palaic ''ti'' suggest Indo-Anatolian ''*tī́''<ref name=Kloekorst>Alwin Kloekorst (2007); [https://archive.org/details/etymological-dictionary-of-the-hittite-inherited-lexicon/mode/1up ''Etymological Dictionary Of The Hittite Inherited Lexicon'']</ref>; although it could also be pointed out that the Anatolitan counterparts might be mere rearrangements from the non-emphatic PIE 1.SG.NOM. ''*h<sub>1</sub>eǵ(ō)'' plus an accusative enclitic of the second-person singular (i.e. ''*te-eǵ'' ⇒ ''*tī́ǵ'' (PA))<ref name=Szemerényi>Oswald Szemerényi (1990); [https://archive.org/details/szemerenyieinfuhrungindievergleichendesprachwissenschaft4thedition1990/mode/2up ''Einführung in die vergleichende Sprachwissenschaft'']</ref><ref name=Petersen>Walter Petersen (1930); [https://www.jstor.org/stable/409118?read-now=1&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents ''The Inflection of Indo-European Personal Pronouns'']</ref>, or even the result of the palatalization of apical consonants due phonetic height (i.e. ''*tū'' (PIA) ⇒ ''*tyū'' (?) ⇒ ''*tī'' (PA))<ref name=Melchert>Craig Melchert (1983); [https://linguistics.ucla.edu/people/Melchert/2ndsingularpronoun.pdf ''The Second Singular Personal Pronoun in Anatolian'']</ref>. | |||
*The third-person singulars ''*aī́h<sub>0</sub>i'', ''*aī́h<sub>0</sub>'', and ''*aī́ts'' possess a shorter form when complemented by a noun (e.g. ''*aī́h<sub>0</sub>i'' "he" ⇒ ''*h<sub>0</sub>naī́r h<sub>0</sub>i'' "he, the man"). The reason for this is that in the Codex, pronouns used to be morphologically treated as affixes, and therefore couldn't stand by themselves except when linked to a root (e.g. ''ˈə-e̞ː'' "he/she/it", but not ''**e̞ː''). | |||
**As a result, the clitic counterparts gained a sense as proximal demonstratives in PIE, being evident in forms such as Latin ''is'' "he", ''ea'' "she", and ''id'' "it", whose anaphoric use prohibts them to stand by themselves. | |||
***e.g. ''*h<sub>0</sub>í'' "he" ⇒ ''*h<sub>1</sub>í'' "this/he"; ''*íh<sub>0</sub>'' "she" ⇒ ''*h<sub>1</sub>íh<sub>2</sub>'' "this/she"; ''*íts'' "it" ⇒ ''*h<sub>1</sub>íd'' "this/it". | |||
*Overall, the dual is formed by erasing sounds of the singular, then reduplicating it (e.g. ''*h<sub>5</sub>ih<sub>1</sub>ṓn'' ⇒ ''*ōi̯ṓn''; ''*tū́'' ⇒ ''*ūi̯ū́''; ''*aī́h<sub>0</sub>i'' ⇒ ''*aīaī́''), while the plural is formed by erasing the reduplication of the dual, then adding the serial particle ''*-s-'' (e.g. ''*ōi̯ṓn'' ⇒ ''*ṓns''; ''*ūi̯ū́'' ⇒ ''*ū́s''; ''*aīaī́'' ⇒ ''*aī́s''), and the collective simply does the latter but with the suffix ''*-a'' (e.g. ''*ōi̯ṓn'' ⇒ ''*ṓna''; ''*ūi̯ū́'' ⇒ ''*ū́a''; ''*aīaī́'' ⇒ ''*aī́a''''). Medial ''*i̯'' ~ ''*u̯'' is inserted to avoid diphthongs between reduplicated vowels, and ''*ts'' is applied in other cases when two bordering vowels are similar (except those involving schwas). | |||
**Rather than the nominative of the first and second-person dual/plural in PIE being prehistorical combinations (i.e. ''*u'' 2.SG + ''*e'' 1.SG. + = ''we'' 1.DU./PL.; ''*i'' 3.SG. + ''*u'' 2.SG = ''*yu'' 2.DU./PL.)<ref name=Seebold>Elmar Seebold (1984); [https://annas-archive.org/md5/e8ece7cab77fe9adeae0052312aa3d89 ''Das System der Personalpronomina in den frühgermanischen Sprachen: Sein Aufbau und seine Herkunft'']</ref>, the dual products of the Aryan patterns would eventually substitute the plural forms of the first and second-person in their nominative equivalents (i.e. ''*ṓns'' "we (plural)" ⇒ ∅, replaced by ''*ōi̯ṓn'' "we (dual)" (A) ⇒ ''*wéy'' "we (plural)" (PIE); ''*ūs'' "you (plural)" ⇒ ∅, replaced by ''*ūi̯ū́'' "you (dual)" (A) ⇒ ''*yū́'' "you (plural)" (PIE)), while their oblique inflections for example would assume other spots in the ancestor of Indo-European languages (i.e. ''*noh<sub>0</sub>(m)'' 1.DU.ACC. (A) ⇒ ''*n̥h<sub>1</sub>wé'' ~ ''*nōh<sub>1</sub>'' 1.DU.ACC. (PIE); ''*i̯uh<sub>0</sub>(m)'' 2.DU.ACC. (A) ⇒ ''*uh<sub>1</sub>wé'' ~ ''*wōh<sub>1</sub>'' 2.DU.ACC. (PIE)). | |||
**The particle <''*m''> gains the property of the serial particle <''*s''> when the latter conflates with the particle ''*ts'' (e.g. third-person plural locative ''*itsim'' instead of ''*itsis''). This contamination was likely encouraged due the abundant presence of ''*m'' in the accusative, and produces an alternative explanation to the hypothesis that the oblique of the first-person plural was''*ms-'' before becoming ''*ns-''<ref name=Sihler>Andrew Sihler (1995); [https://archive.org/details/sihler-andrew-new-comparative-grammar-of-greek-and-latin/mode/2up ''New Comparative Grammar Of Greek And Latin'']</ref>. Later in PIE, not only plural forms (e.g. ''*nsai̯(m)'' 1.PL.DAT. (A) ⇒ ''*n̥sméy'' 1.PL.DAT. (PIE)) would become contaminated, but also singular ones (e.g. ''*iai̯'' "to him" (A) ⇒ ''*h<sub>1</sub>esmōy'' "to him" (PIE)); including verbal affixes (e.g.''*-nas'' 1.PL.VB. (A) ⇒ ''*-mos'' 1.PL.VB. (PIE)). | |||
====Possessive Pronouns==== | |||
nás, tu̯ás, h0iás/ih0ás/i ... tsu̯á | |||
in Aryan possessive pronouns could be produced through the pure oblique or any inflected form, as long as it received the affix -ás. | |||
nás ~ nai̯ás ~ ni̯aás ~ niás | |||
nás h0naír | |||
compare the translation for "my man" | |||
''*nh0(m)ás h0naī́r'' (A) > ''*h1mós h2nḗr'' (PIE) > ''ἐμός ἀνήρ'' (G) | |||
-as -ah0 -am | -aī -ah0ī -aī | |||
-ias -i | -īas īs | |||
-h0i -ih0 -its | -h0ias -ih0as -itsas | |||
====Reflexive Pronouns==== | |||
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;" | {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;" | ||
! rowspan=" | ! rowspan="2" | | ||
! colspan=" | ! colspan="4" | REFLEXIVE PRONOUN DECLENSION | ||
|- | |- | ||
! | ! Singular | ||
! | ! Dual | ||
! | ! Plural | ||
! Collective | |||
|- | |- | ||
! Nominative | |||
| *tsū́r ~ *tsáur || *ūi̯ū́r || ū́rs || *ū́ra | |||
|- | |||
! Accusative | |||
| *su̯h<sub>0</sub> || *ruh<sub>0</sub> || *u̯rsh<sub>0</sub> || *u̯rah<sub>0</sub> | |||
|- | |||
! Genitive | |||
| *su̯i̯a || *rui̯a || *u̯rsi̯a || *u̯rai̯a | |||
|- | |||
! Locative | |||
| *su̯i || *rui || *u̯rsi || *u̯rai | |||
|- | |||
! Dative | |||
| *su̯ai̯ || *ruai̯ || *u̯rsai̯ || *u̯raai̯ | |||
|- | |||
|} | |||
*The reflexive pronoun ''*tsū́r'' derives from an older ''*ū́tsar'' (equivalent to Aryan ''*aítsar'' "this/that one", PIE ''*h<sub>1</sub>íteros'' "(an)other"), itself a borrowing from Diluvian ''aocar'', whose <''*ū́''> portion is still visible in another borrowing into Aryan (i.e. the second-person singular ''*tū́''). | |||
**In PIE, it was reanalyzed as its accusative form (i.e.''*su̯h<sub>0</sub>'' "themselves" ⇒ ''*swé'' "themselves"), thus degrading the dual, plural, and collective inflections. | |||
====Demonstrative Pronouns==== | |||
[..] | |||
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;" | |||
! rowspan="3" | | |||
! colspan="12" | PRONOUN DECLENSION | |||
|- | |||
! colspan="3" | Singular | |||
! colspan="3" | Dual | |||
! colspan="3" | Plural | |||
! colspan="3" | Collective | |||
|- | |||
! Masculine | |||
! Feminine | |||
! Neuter | |||
! Masculine | ! Masculine | ||
! Feminine | ! Feminine | ||
| Line 3,153: | Line 3,294: | ||
|- | |- | ||
! Nominative | ! Nominative | ||
| *h<sub>0</sub>tsar || *tsah<sub>0</sub>r || *tsar || * | | *h<sub>0</sub>tsar|| *tsah<sub>0</sub>r || *tsar || *h<sub>0</sub>tātā || *tātāh<sub>0</sub> || *tātā || *h<sub>0</sub>tās || *tāh<sub>0</sub>s || *tās || *h<sub>0</sub>tāa || *tāh<sub>0</sub>a || *tāa | ||
|- | |- | ||
! Accusative | ! Accusative | ||
| * | | *tam || *tah<sub>0</sub>m || *tats || *atam || *atah<sub>0</sub>m || *atats || *tasm || *tah<sub>0</sub>sm || *tas || *tam || *tah<sub>0</sub>am || *taa | ||
|- | |- | ||
! Genitive | ! Genitive | ||
| * | | *tai̯a || *tah<sub>0</sub>i̯a || *tai̯a || *atai̯a || *atah<sub>0</sub>i̯a || *atai̯a || *tasi̯a || *tah<sub>0</sub>si̯a || *tasi̯a || *taai̯a || *tah<sub>0</sub>ai̯a || *taai̯a | ||
|- | |- | ||
! Locative | ! Locative | ||
| * | | *tai || *tah<sub>0</sub>i || *tai || *atai || *atah<sub>0</sub>i || *atai || *tasi || *tah<sub>0</sub>si || *tasi || *taai || *tah<sub>0</sub>ai || *taai | ||
|- | |- | ||
! Dative | ! Dative | ||
| * | | *taai̯ || *tah<sub>0</sub>ai̯ || *taai̯ || *ataai̯ || *atah<sub>0</sub>ai̯ || *ataai̯ || *tasai̯ || *tah<sub>0</sub>sai̯ || *tasai̯ || *taaai̯ || *tah<sub>0</sub>aai̯ || *taaai̯ | ||
|- | |- | ||
|} | |} | ||
''*aítsaras'' "one there" | ''*-tsaras'' (emphatic affix) ⇒ ''*-teros'' (emphatic affix), with the demonstrative sense shown in ''*aítsaras'' "one there" ⇒ ''*h<sub>1</sub>íteros'' "(an)other" | ||
tsar > *só "that" | |||
-om (emphatic) | |||
-tar (loc.) | -tar (loc.) | ||
| Line 3,182: | Line 3,326: | ||
tsatar "that > tor | tsatar "that > tor | ||
Initial clusters in the Nominative will give way to /ə/<br> | h0tā́a > h1etṓa > tóy | ||
*ptā́r (A)> *patḗr (PIE)<br> | táa > téa > teh2 | ||
*páh5man > *póh5mn̥ > πῶμα "slid"<br> | |||
[*peh5] "feed, protect" | |||
h0 may become h1 as <e> or h2 as <a> | |||
*aī́h0i, *aī́h0, *aíts > *h0i, *ih0, *its | |||
*h5ílias, *h5íli > *lis, li | |||
specialized/not | |||
as this segment results in 6 possibilities | |||
ʕih > ~ h5ī ~ aī ~ aih1 ~ h5ih1 ~ ai ~ i | |||
*All demonstratives of the ''*-ias'' paradigm transitioned from animate/inanimate to masculine/feminine/neuter declension. | |||
**Either through the tonic form (e.g. "other" ''*h<sub>5</sub>ílias'', ''*h<sub>5</sub>íli'' (Aryan) ⇒ ''*h<sub>2</sub>élyos'', ''*h<sub>2</sub>élyeh<sub>2</sub>'', ''*h<sub>2</sub>élyod'' (PIE)), or the clitic form (e.g. "this" ''*kis'', ''*ki'' (from Aryan ''*h<sub>5</sub>íkias'', ''*h<sub>5</sub>íki'') > ''*ḱís'', ''*ḱíh<sub>2</sub>'', ''*ḱíd'' (PIE)). | |||
====Interrogative Pronouns==== | |||
[..] | |||
====Indefinite Pronouns==== | |||
[..] | |||
====Relative Pronouns==== | |||
[..] | |||
===Verb=== | |||
[...] | |||
====Aspect==== | |||
The Origin of Aspect in the Indo-European Languages Oswald Szemerényi | |||
====?==== | |||
''*gaínōm'', ''*gígnmi'' "I generate" | |||
''*pūhāṓm'', ''*píbmi'' "I drink" | |||
''*wehdḗyōm'', ''*wḗydmi'' "I see" | |||
*gánas > γόνος "offspring" | |||
Initial clusters in the Nominative will give way to /ə/<br> | |||
*ptā́r (A)> *patḗr (PIE)<br> | |||
*páh5man > *póh5mn̥ > πῶμα "slid"<br> | |||
[*peh5] "feed, protect" | |||
| Line 3,379: | Line 3,564: | ||
[...] | [...] | ||
By examining a large corpus of hellenic texts, Jakob Wackernagel stated in his essay how enclitics in Greek sentences are mostly located in the second position<ref name=Wackernagel>Wackernagel | By examining a large corpus of hellenic texts, Jakob Wackernagel stated in his essay how enclitics in Greek sentences are mostly located in the second position<ref name=Wackernagel>Jakob Wackernagel (1892); [https://archive.org/details/indogermanischef01berluoft/page/332/mode/2up ''Über ein Gesetz der indogermanischen Worstellung'']</ref>. For example, he contrasted specifically the accusative of the first-person pronoun in the isolated (''ἐμέ'') and enclitic (''με'') forms: | ||
<blockquote>Besonders belehrend sind aber die paar Inschriften mit ''ἐμέ''. Zweimal steht dieses ''ἐμέ'' auch an zweiter Stelle: IGA. 20,8 (Korinth) ''᾿Απολλόδωρος ἐμὲ ἀνέθ[ηκε]'' und Gazette archéol. 1888 S. 168 ''Μεναΐδας ἐμ’ ἐποί(ϝ)εςε Χαρόπ(ι)''. Aber sechsmal steht ''ἐμέ'' anders: Klein S.39 ''Ἐξηκίας ἔγραψε κἀπόηςε ἐμέ'' (Vers?) 5. 40 ''Ἑξηκίας ἔγραψε κἀ(ι)ποίης᾽ ἐμέ'' (Vers?). S.''ΟῚ Χαριταῖος ἐποίηςεν ἔμ᾽ εὖ''. 8. 82 ''Ἑρμογένης ἐποίηςεν ἐμέ''. 8.85 ''Ἑρμογένης ἐποίηςεν ἐνέ'' (liess ''ἐμέ''). S. 85 ''Σακωνίδης ἔγραψεν ἐμέ''. Diese Stellen zeigen, dass die regelmässige Stellung von ''με'' hinter dem ersten Wort nicht zufällig und dass sie durch seine enklitische Natur bedingt ist. [Vgl. noch die Nachträge.]</blockquote> | <blockquote>Besonders belehrend sind aber die paar Inschriften mit ''ἐμέ''. Zweimal steht dieses ''ἐμέ'' auch an zweiter Stelle: IGA. 20,8 (Korinth) ''᾿Απολλόδωρος ἐμὲ ἀνέθ[ηκε]'' und Gazette archéol. 1888 S. 168 ''Μεναΐδας ἐμ’ ἐποί(ϝ)εςε Χαρόπ(ι)''. Aber sechsmal steht ''ἐμέ'' anders: Klein S.39 ''Ἐξηκίας ἔγραψε κἀπόηςε ἐμέ'' (Vers?) 5. 40 ''Ἑξηκίας ἔγραψε κἀ(ι)ποίης᾽ ἐμέ'' (Vers?). S.''ΟῚ Χαριταῖος ἐποίηςεν ἔμ᾽ εὖ''. 8. 82 ''Ἑρμογένης ἐποίηςεν ἐμέ''. 8.85 ''Ἑρμογένης ἐποίηςεν ἐνέ'' (liess ''ἐμέ''). S. 85 ''Σακωνίδης ἔγραψεν ἐμέ''. Diese Stellen zeigen, dass die regelmässige Stellung von ''με'' hinter dem ersten Wort nicht zufällig und dass sie durch seine enklitische Natur bedingt ist. [Vgl. noch die Nachträge.]</blockquote> | ||
| Line 3,387: | Line 3,572: | ||
A riddle in German: | A riddle in German: | ||
: ''Der Vater ist noch nicht geboren,'' | : ''Der Vater ist noch nicht geboren,'' | ||
: ''der Sohn ist schon auf dem Dache.''<ref name=Aarne>Anti Aarne; [https://digitalisate.sub.uni-hamburg.de/recherche/detail?tx_dlf%5Bdouble%5D=0&tx_dlf%5Bid%5D=48996&tx_dlf%5Bpage%5D=32&tx_dlf_navigation%5Baction%5D=main&tx_dlf_navigation%5Bcontroller%5D=Navigation&cHash=7cd75d7f3224787416091debb4db9c9a Vergleichende Rätselforschungen] | : ''der Sohn ist schon auf dem Dache.''<ref name=Aarne>Anti Aarne (1918-1920); [https://digitalisate.sub.uni-hamburg.de/recherche/detail?tx_dlf%5Bdouble%5D=0&tx_dlf%5Bid%5D=48996&tx_dlf%5Bpage%5D=32&tx_dlf_navigation%5Baction%5D=main&tx_dlf_navigation%5Bcontroller%5D=Navigation&cHash=7cd75d7f3224787416091debb4db9c9a Vergleichende Rätselforschungen]</ref> | ||
:: The father is not yet born, | :: The father is not yet born, | ||
:: the son is already on the roof. | :: the son is already on the roof. | ||
| Line 3,395: | Line 3,580: | ||
: ''noire est la semmence,'' | : ''noire est la semmence,'' | ||
: ''l'homme qui le semme,'' | : ''l'homme qui le semme,'' | ||
: ''est de très grand science.''<ref name=Aarne>Anti Aarne; [https://digitalisate.sub.uni-hamburg.de/recherche/detail?tx_dlf%5Bdouble%5D=0&tx_dlf%5Bid%5D=48996&tx_dlf%5Bpage%5D=32&tx_dlf_navigation%5Baction%5D=main&tx_dlf_navigation%5Bcontroller%5D=Navigation&cHash=7cd75d7f3224787416091debb4db9c9a Vergleichende Rätselforschungen] | : ''est de très grand science.''<ref name=Aarne>Anti Aarne (1918-1920); [https://digitalisate.sub.uni-hamburg.de/recherche/detail?tx_dlf%5Bdouble%5D=0&tx_dlf%5Bid%5D=48996&tx_dlf%5Bpage%5D=32&tx_dlf_navigation%5Baction%5D=main&tx_dlf_navigation%5Bcontroller%5D=Navigation&cHash=7cd75d7f3224787416091debb4db9c9a Vergleichende Rätselforschungen]</ref> | ||
:: White is the field, | :: White is the field, | ||
:: black is the seed, | :: black is the seed, | ||
| Line 3,431: | Line 3,616: | ||
movement verbs and cases: cubitum ire *as French and German treat it in the european sprachbund | movement verbs and cases: cubitum ire *as French and German treat it in the european sprachbund | ||
eo domum | eo domum | ||
end goal: accusative | end goal: accusative | ||
*h2iyṓm dámam | *h2iyṓm dámam | ||
[[w:Standard average european||europoid]] | [[w:Standard average european||europoid]] | ||
какой-то сказал | какой-то сказал | ||
Ja vot tut ... | in dem Anfang, hat Gott die Erde und den Himmel geschaffen | ||
Männer, deren Kinder gestorben haben, | |||
==Sample text== | der Schicksal dessen, der gelitten habt | ||
der Schicksal derer, die gelitten haben | |||
==References== | |||
Ja vot tut ... | |||
==Sample text== | |||
==References== | |||
Bergaige, Abel; Du Rôle de la dérivation dans la déclinaison indo-européenne: https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k57721099.texteImage# | Einleitung in die Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft (Pott) | ||
Bergaige, Abel; Essai sur la construction grammaticale considérée dans son développement historique, en sanscrit, en grec, en latin, dans les langues romanes et dans les langues germaniques: https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k5803410m/f6 | hermann hirt Indogermanische Grammatik | ||
> | Franz Bopp | ||
Schleicher | |||
Calvert Watkins | |||
Jochem Schindler | |||
Helmut Rix | |||
Kuryłowicz | |||
Boisacq : É. Boisacq, Dictionnaire étymologique de la langue grecque. Heidelberg, 1916. | |||
Brugmann, Griech. Gram?: Griechische Grammatik, | |||
Chantraine, GH: Grammaire homérique. | |||
Chantraine, Morphologie : Morphologie historique du grec. 1947. 2nd ed. 1961. | |||
Chantraine, Formation ` La formation des noms en grec ancien | |||
CIL : Corpus Inscriptionum Latinarum. | |||
Collitz-Bechtel, D: Sammlung griechischer Dialektinschriften. 1884— 1915 | |||
Egli, Heteroklisie im Griechischen: J. Egli, Heteroklisie im Griechischen, mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der Fälle von Gelenkheteroklisie. Dissert. Zürich | |||
Ehrlich, Betonung ` Untersuchungen über die Natur der griechischen Betonung. 1912 | |||
Ernout-Meillet, Dictionnaire étym.: Dictionnaire étymologique de la langue latine | |||
Evidence for Laryngeals : Evidence for Laryngeals — Work papers of a conference in Indo—European linguistics on May 7 and 8, 1959. Edited by Werner Winter. Austin, Texas, 1960 | |||
Frisk, GEW ` Griechisches etymologisches Wörterbuch. Heidelberg 1954 | |||
Kuryłowicz, A pophonie ` L'apophonie en indo-européen. 1956. | |||
Kuryłowicz, Accentuation *: L'accentuation des langues indo—européennes. 2nd ed. 1958. | |||
Leumann-Hofmann :M. Leumann-]. B. Hofmann, Lateinische Grammatik, 5th ed. 1926-8 | |||
Meillet, Zz£roduction 9: Introduction a l'étude comparative des langues indo-européennes. 8th ed. 1937 | |||
Pokorny : Pokorny, /wdogermanisches Etymologisches Wörterbuch. 1948- | |||
Wackernagel (-Debrunner), AzGr. : Altindische Grammatik | |||
Bergaige, Abel; Du Rôle de la dérivation dans la déclinaison indo-européenne: https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k57721099.texteImage# | |||
Bergaige, Abel; Essai sur la construction grammaticale considérée dans son développement historique, en sanscrit, en grec, en latin, dans les langues romanes et dans les langues germaniques: https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k5803410m/f6 | |||
> | |||
https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.322486/mode/2up | |||
https://archive.org/details/sanskritgrammari00whituoft/page/xx/mode/2up?view=theater | |||
https://archive.org/details/AGrammarOfModernIndo-european/page/n1/mode/2up?view=theater&q=determiner | |||
*Behaghel, Otto (1932), ''Deutsche Syntax'' | |||
*Brugmmann, Karl (1925), ''Die syntax des einfachen satzes im indogermanischen'' | |||
*Brugmmann; Delbrück (1889), ''Grundriss der vergleichenden grammatik der indogermanischen sprachen'' | |||
*Benveniste, Émile (1935), ''Les Origines de la Formation des Noms en Indo-Européen'' | |||
*Collinge, N. E. (1985), ''The Laws of Indo-European'' | |||
*Jespersen , Otto (1924), ''The Philosophy Of Grammar'' | |||
*Priscianus (6th Century), ''Institutiones Grammaticae'' | |||
*Sütterlin, Ludwig (1908), ''Die Lehre von der Lautbildung'' | |||
*Sommerstein, Alan (1973), ''Sound Pattern of Ancient Greek'' | *Sommerstein, Alan (1973), ''Sound Pattern of Ancient Greek'' | ||
*Thomasus Erfordiensis (13th Century), ''Tractatus de Modis Significandi seu Grammatica Speculativa'' | *Thomasus Erfordiensis (13th Century), ''Tractatus de Modis Significandi seu Grammatica Speculativa'' | ||