Verse:Tdūrzů/Knench/Ancient: Difference between revisions

IlL (talk | contribs)
m IlL moved page User:IlL/A Danified analytic Neo-Arabic/Ancient to User:IlL/Knench/Ancient without leaving a redirect
IlL (talk | contribs)
 
(9 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 49: Line 49:


===Vowels===
===Vowels===
Ancient Knench retained Proto-Canaanite vowel length and developed overlong vowels. It had the chain shift ''ā'' > ''ō'' > ''ū'', similar to our timeline's Punic and Irta's Tsarfati Hebrew, and developed a new ''ā'' from compensatory lengthening.
Ancient Knench retained Proto-Canaanite vowel length and developed overlong vowels. It had the chain shift ''ā'' > ''ō'' > ''ū'', similar to our timeline's Punic, and developed a new ''ā'' from compensatory lengthening.


'''a e i u ā ē ī ō ū ê î ô û''' /a ɛ~e ɪ~ɨ ʊ~o aː ɛː iː ɔː uː ɛːː iːː ɔːː uːː/
'''a e i u ā ē ī ō ū ê î ô û''' /a ɛ~e ɪ~ɨ ʊ~o aː ɛː iː ɔː uː ɛːː iːː ɔːː uːː/
Line 55: Line 55:
Minimal pairs and triples for overlong vowels in Ancient Knench:
Minimal pairs and triples for overlong vowels in Ancient Knench:
* ''malkō'' 'a queen', ''malkô'' 'her king'
* ''malkō'' 'a queen', ''malkô'' 'her king'
* ''suprī'' 'count! (f.sg.)', ''suprî'' 'literary, written'
* ''sufrī'' 'count! (f.sg.)', ''sufrî'' 'literary, written'
* ''harbi!'' 'do something a lot! (m.sg.)' ''harbī!'' 'ibid., f.sg.' ''harbî'' 'numerous'
* ''harbi!'' 'do something a lot! (m.sg.)' ''harbī!'' 'ibid., f.sg.' ''harbî'' 'numerous'
* ''dammim'' 'bleed!', ''dammīm'' 'bloodshed', ''dammîm'' 'bloody, of or like blood (masculine plural)'
* ''dammim'' 'bleed!', ''dammīm'' 'bloodshed', ''dammîm'' 'bloody, of or like blood (masculine plural)'
Line 61: Line 61:
* ''rū3ē'' 'the evils of', ''rū3ê'' 'the friends of'
* ''rū3ē'' 'the evils of', ''rū3ê'' 'the friends of'


Many instances of long and overlong vowels resulted from dropped aleph and he and instances of lost gemination in grammatical affixes. For example: '''' 'come! (m.sg.)' (from *būʔ < *buʔ,  Tiberian Hebrew /bo:/)
Many instances of long and overlong vowels resulted from dropped aleph and he and instances of lost gemination in grammatical affixes. For example: '''' 'come! (m.sg.)' (from *būʔ < *buʔ,  Tiberian Hebrew /bo:/)


===Prosody===
===Prosody===
Line 378: Line 378:


====Binyan ''fuȝȝal'' (puʕal)====
====Binyan ''fuȝȝal'' (puʕal)====
====Binyan ''hivȝīl'' (hifʕil)====
====Binyan ''hivȝil'' (hifʕil)====
{| border="1" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="1" class="bluetable lightbluebg" style="width: 700px; text-align:center;"
{| border="1" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="1" class="bluetable lightbluebg" style="width: 700px; text-align:center;"
|+ ''hibdīl'' 'he separated'
|+ ''hibdil'' 'he separated'
! style="width: 75px; "| → Person<br/>↓ Tense
! style="width: 75px; "| → Person<br/>↓ Tense
! style="width: 75px; " | 1s
! style="width: 75px; " | 1s
Line 394: Line 394:
|-
|-
! preterite indep.
! preterite indep.
| ''wôbdīl''
| ''wôbdil''
| ''waθθabdīl''
| ''waθθabdil''
| ''waθθabdīlī''
| ''waθθabdilī''
| ''wajjabdīl''
| ''wajjabdil''
| ''waθθabdīl''
| ''waθθabdil''
| ''wannabdīl''
| ''wannabdil''
| ''waθθabdīlū''
| ''waθθabdilū''
| ''waθθabdelna''
| ''waθθabdelna''
| ''wajjabdīlū''
| ''wajjabdilū''
| ''waθθabdelna''
| ''waθθabdelna''
|-
|-
Line 409: Line 409:
| ''hibdelθa''
| ''hibdelθa''
| ''hibdelθe''
| ''hibdelθe''
| ''hibdīl''
| ''hibdil''
| ''hibdīlō''
| ''hibdilō''
| ''hibdelnu''
| ''hibdelnu''
| ''hibdelθem''
| ''hibdelθem''
| ''hibdelθen''
| ''hibdelθen''
|colspan=2|''hibdīlū''
|colspan=2|''hibdilū''
|-
|-
! present indep.
! present indep.
Line 428: Line 428:
|-
|-
! present dep.
! present dep.
| ''habdīl''
| ''habdil''
| ''θabdīl''
| ''θabdil''
| ''θabdīlī''
| ''θabdilī''
| ''jabdīl''
| ''jabdil''
| ''θabdīl''
| ''θabdil''
| ''nabdīl''
| ''nabdil''
| ''θabdīlū''
| ''θabdilū''
| ''θabdelna''
| ''θabdelna''
| ''jabdīlū''
| ''jabdilū''
| ''θabdelna''
| ''θabdelna''
|-
|-
Line 452: Line 452:
|-
|-
! participle
! participle
|colspan=10| ''mabdīl''
|colspan=10| ''mabdil''
|-
|-
! infinitive
! infinitive
|colspan=10| ''habdīl''
|colspan=10| ''habdil''
|}
|}


Line 551: Line 551:


===Prepositions===
===Prepositions===
*jūδ = direct object marker
*jūt = direct object marker
*li- = to, for, of
*li- = to, for, of
*pi- = in, at, by, with (inst.)
*bi- = in, at, by, with (inst.)
*tum la- = like, as
*dum la- = like, as
*miC- = from
*miC- = from
*ȝim, hiδ = with (comit.)
*ȝim, hit = with (comit.)
*wēn = without
*wēn = without
*jaȝn = because of
*jaȝn = because of
Line 562: Line 562:


===Conjunctions===
===Conjunctions===
*xa- = and ('like' > 'and')
*ka- = and ('like' > 'and')
*ja3n = because
*ja3n = because
==Syntax==
==Syntax==
Ancient Knench syntax is similar to Bibical Hebrew but appears more streamlined from an IE perspective. Basic word order was retained as VSO (unlike in spoken Biblical Hebrew).
Ancient Knench syntax is similar to Bibical Hebrew but appears more streamlined from an IE perspective. Basic word order was retained as VSO (unlike in spoken Biblical Hebrew).
Line 583: Line 584:
#there were many verbs after which either la + IC or bare IC were commonly used
#there were many verbs after which either la + IC or bare IC were commonly used
#ba- or xa- + IC + NOUN = "when possessor VERBs/VERBed..."
#ba- or xa- + IC + NOUN = "when possessor VERBs/VERBed..."
#more generally clauses with IC serve to point to an action in a tenseless way, like "for NOUN to VERB": ''lū jūʕīl hiwwasivū laθ-θessuᴋō'' = 'It is not worth it for him to join the fight'
#more generally clauses with IC serve to point to an action in a tenseless way, like "for NOUN to VERB": ''lū jūʕil hiwwasifū lat-tessuᴋō'' = 'It is not worth it for him to join the fight'


===Narratives===
===Narratives===