Knašta/-Ins In Speech And Literature: Difference between revisions

(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)

Line 32:

== ''-Ins'' In Literature ==

In literature, '''-ins''' is used to mark possession, and in many places where ''dos'' is used (most remarkably '''-ins''' is never used to turn nouns into adjectives, like ''dos ~~jésund~~'', which means ''healthy'', but can be literally translated as ''of health''). Nouns, not pronouns, that show possession tend to be ''after'' the objects they are possessing.

In literature, '''-ins''' is used to mark possession, and in many places where ''dos'' is used (most remarkably '''-ins''' is never used to turn nouns into adjectives, like ''dos jésůnd'', which means ''healthy'', but can be literally translated as ''of health''). Nouns, not pronouns, that show possession tend to be ''after'' the objects they are possessing.

=== Examples ===

Line 59:

<br/>

What's this '''plan of attack'''?

[[Category:Knašta]]

@@ Line 32: / Line 32: @@
 == ''-Ins'' In Literature ==
-In literature, '''-ins''' is used to mark possession, and in many places where ''dos'' is used  (most remarkably '''-ins''' is never used to turn nouns into adjectives, like ''dos jésund'', which means ''healthy'', but can be literally translated as ''of health''). Nouns, not pronouns, that show possession tend to be ''after'' the objects they are possessing.
+In literature, '''-ins''' is used to mark possession, and in many places where ''dos'' is used  (most remarkably '''-ins''' is never used to turn nouns into adjectives, like ''dos jésůnd'', which means ''healthy'', but can be literally translated as ''of health''). Nouns, not pronouns, that show possession tend to be ''after'' the objects they are possessing.
 === Examples ===
@@ Line 59: / Line 59: @@
 <br/>
 What's this '''plan of attack'''?
+[[Category:Knašta]]