Proto-Carpathian: Difference between revisions

Raistas (talk | contribs)
Added infobox
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Infobox proto-language
| name        = Proto-Carpathian
| creator    = User:Raistas
| target      = Carpathian
| familycolor = oronaic
| ancestor    = [[Proto-Oronaic]]
| ancestor2  = Proto-Alpathian
| child1      = [[West Carpathian]]
| child2      = [[East Carpathian]]
| child3      = [[South Carpathian]]
}}
'''Proto-Carpathian''' is the common ancestor of the [[Carpathian languages]]. Proto-Carpathian is not attested in any texts, but has been reconstructed by linguists. It is itself descended ultimately from [[Proto-Oronaic]] or possibly from an intermediate stage, called Proto-Alpathian.
'''Proto-Carpathian''' is the common ancestor of the [[Carpathian languages]]. Proto-Carpathian is not attested in any texts, but has been reconstructed by linguists. It is itself descended ultimately from [[Proto-Oronaic]] or possibly from an intermediate stage, called Proto-Alpathian.
==Stages==
==Stages==
Line 62: Line 74:
Vowel *a /ɑ/ resulted from a secondary development and can give irregular results in daughter languages, for example: ''*tálu-nə'' > ''*talun'' ("high") became ''tālu'' in West Carpathian and ''tallo'' in East Carpathian, but ''tolu'' in South Carpathian (*a merged with *o into *a in Early Proto-Carpathian and shifted into *o later). Vowel *ä, unlike its back counterpart, failed to shift into *e before some consonant clusters and remained distinct from *e.
Vowel *a /ɑ/ resulted from a secondary development and can give irregular results in daughter languages, for example: ''*tálu-nə'' > ''*talun'' ("high") became ''tālu'' in West Carpathian and ''tallo'' in East Carpathian, but ''tolu'' in South Carpathian (*a merged with *o into *a in Early Proto-Carpathian and shifted into *o later). Vowel *ä, unlike its back counterpart, failed to shift into *e before some consonant clusters and remained distinct from *e.


Like in Proto-Oronaic, four reduced vowels were present, marked as *ə<sub>1</sub>, *ə<sub>2</sub>, *ə<sub>3</sub> and *ə<sub>4</sub>, which probably still remained an allophone of *ə<sub>3</sub> The actual realization of them is a question of not known precisely: vowel harmony also applied to those reduced vowels with *ə<sub>1</sub>-*ə<sub>2</sub>, *ë-*ə<sub>4</sub> and *ə<sub>3</sub>-*ə<sub>4</sub> contrasts. Most scholars analize them as following:
Like in Proto-Oronaic, four reduced vowels were present, marked as *ə<sub>1</sub>, *ə<sub>2</sub>, *ə<sub>3</sub> and *ə<sub>4</sub>, which probably still remained an allophone of *ə<sub>3</sub> The actual realization of them is a question of debate: vowel harmony also applied to those reduced vowels with *ə<sub>1</sub>-*ə<sub>2</sub>, *ë-*ə<sub>4</sub> and *ə<sub>3</sub>-*ə<sub>4</sub> contrasts. Most scholars analize them as following:
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center"
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center"
|+Middle Proto-Carpathian
|+Middle Proto-Carpathian
Line 131: Line 143:
|
|
|
|
| a /ɑ/
| a /ɑː/
|
|
|
|
| a /ɒ/
| a /ɒː/
|}
|}