Luthic: Difference between revisions
Lëtzelúcia (talk | contribs) |
Lëtzelúcia (talk | contribs) |
||
| (44 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Featured | {{Featured | ||
|featured banner= Esto arteghio è ‘na rasda ascritta. Grazze þamma sina livella qaletadi, piosevoletadi gio capacitadi utilizza, fú gia ascritta votata.}} | |featured banner= Esto arteghio è ‘na rasda ascritta. Grazze þamma sina livella qaletadi, piosevoletadi gio capacitadi utilizza, fú gia ascritta votata.}} | ||
{{privatelang}} | {{privatelang}} | ||
{{Infobox language | {{Infobox language | ||
| Line 41: | Line 40: | ||
| brcl = luth | | brcl = luth | ||
}} | }} | ||
[[Luthic]] ([[w:Help:IPA|/ˈluːθ.ɪk/]] [[w:Help:Pronunciation respelling key|''LOOTH-ik'']], less often ([[w:Help:IPA|/ˈlʌθ.ɪk/]] [[w:Help:Pronunciation respelling key|''LUTH-ik'']]; also ''Luthish''; [[w:Endonym|endonym:]] ''Lúthica'' [[IPA for Luthic|[ˈluː.ti.kɐ]]] or ''Rasda Lúthica'' [[IPA for Luthic|[ˈraz.dɐ ˈluː.ti.kɐ]]]) is an Italic language spoken by the Luths, with significant East Germanic influence. Unlike other Romance languages, such as Portuguese, Spanish, Catalan, Occitan, and French, Luthic preserves a substantial inherited vocabulary from East Germanic, instead of only proper names that survived in historical accounts, and loanwords. About 250,000 people speak Luthic worldwide. | [[Luthic]] ([[w:Help:IPA|/ˈluːθ.ɪk/]] [[w:Help:Pronunciation respelling key|''LOOTH-ik'']], less often ([[w:Help:IPA|/ˈlʌθ.ɪk/]] [[w:Help:Pronunciation respelling key|''LUTH-ik'']]; also ''Luthish''; [[w:Endonym|endonym:]] ''Lúthica'' [[IPA for Luthic|[ˈluː.ti.kɐ]]] or ''Rasda Lúthica'' [[IPA for Luthic|[ˈraz.dɐ ˈluː.ti.kɐ]]]) is an Italic language spoken by the Luths, with significant East Germanic influence. Unlike other Romance languages, such as Portuguese, Spanish, Catalan, Occitan, and French, Luthic preserves a substantial inherited vocabulary from East Germanic, instead of only proper names that survived in historical accounts, and loanwords. About 250,000 people speak Luthic worldwide. | ||
| Line 52: | Line 51: | ||
Luthic is an inflected fusional language, with four/five cases for nouns, pronouns (comitative forms), and adjectives (nominative, accusative, genitive, dative); three genders (masculine, feminine, neuter); and three numbers (singular, dual in personal pronouns, and plural). | Luthic is an inflected fusional language, with four/five cases for nouns, pronouns (comitative forms), and adjectives (nominative, accusative, genitive, dative); three genders (masculine, feminine, neuter); and three numbers (singular, dual in personal pronouns, and plural). | ||
==Etymology== | |||
The ethnonym Luths remains one of the most debated issues in both Germanic and Romance philology. The earliest attestation appears in Greco-Roman authors of the 6th century, who mention the Lūthae (alternatively Lūthī) as one of the new barbaric peoples of Ravenna. This is usually traced back to a Gotho-Luthic lūþiks—although many scholars consider this to be a scribal error, a “correction” of *lūhtiks after influence from Latin lūthicus. | The ethnonym Luths remains one of the most debated issues in both Germanic and Romance philology. The earliest attestation appears in Greco-Roman authors of the 6th century, who mention the Lūthae (alternatively Lūthī) as one of the new barbaric peoples of Ravenna. This is usually traced back to a Gotho-Luthic lūþiks—although many scholars consider this to be a scribal error, a “correction” of *lūhtiks after influence from Latin lūthicus. | ||
| Line 61: | Line 60: | ||
The ethnonym Lūthus appears to derive from the Gothic liuts, meaning “hypocritical” or “dishonest,” likely reflecting the disdain the Greco-Romans felt toward the barbarian kingdom and its plebeian rulers. Among the Luths themselves, however, a folk etymology emerged. They associated the name with Latin lūx, adding the common augmentative suffix -cus/-ticus to form lūcticus. This was later misinterpreted and spirantised by Gothic scribes as *lūhtiks, giving rise to the attested forms lūþiks, lūthicus and Lūthae. This folk etymology may have emerged alongside the Roman use of the term vespertīnī to describe the barbarian peoples living west of Rome—literally “toward the setting sun.” The latter, being a relational adjective to the evening, semantically changed to mean “people of the sunset” or “sunset people,” was subsequently associated with the notion of “light,” further reinforcing the Luths’ own reinterpretation of their ethnonym. | The ethnonym Lūthus appears to derive from the Gothic liuts, meaning “hypocritical” or “dishonest,” likely reflecting the disdain the Greco-Romans felt toward the barbarian kingdom and its plebeian rulers. Among the Luths themselves, however, a folk etymology emerged. They associated the name with Latin lūx, adding the common augmentative suffix -cus/-ticus to form lūcticus. This was later misinterpreted and spirantised by Gothic scribes as *lūhtiks, giving rise to the attested forms lūþiks, lūthicus and Lūthae. This folk etymology may have emerged alongside the Roman use of the term vespertīnī to describe the barbarian peoples living west of Rome—literally “toward the setting sun.” The latter, being a relational adjective to the evening, semantically changed to mean “people of the sunset” or “sunset people,” was subsequently associated with the notion of “light,” further reinforcing the Luths’ own reinterpretation of their ethnonym. | ||
==The study of Luthic== | |||
The earliest varieties of Luthic, collectively known as the Gotho-Luthic Continuum (continuo gotholúthico), emerged from sustained contact between Vulgar Latin dialects—those that would later develop into Italo-Romance varieties—and the East Germanic languages. Over the course of roughly five centuries, a significant amount of East Germanic vocabulary was absorbed into Luthic. Comparative linguistic analysis and historical records suggest that approximately 1,200 uncompounded words can be traced back to Gothic, and ultimately to Proto-Indo-European. These borrowings predominantly consist of nouns (~700), verbs (~300), and adjectives (~200), showing how East Germanic influence reached the core lexical categories. In addition, Luthic incorporated numerous loanwords from West Germanic languages during the Early Middle Ages. | The earliest varieties of Luthic, collectively known as the Gotho-Luthic Continuum (continuo gotholúthico), emerged from sustained contact between Vulgar Latin dialects—those that would later develop into Italo-Romance varieties—and the East Germanic languages. Over the course of roughly five centuries, a significant amount of East Germanic vocabulary was absorbed into Luthic. Comparative linguistic analysis and historical records suggest that approximately 1,200 uncompounded words can be traced back to Gothic, and ultimately to Proto-Indo-European. These borrowings predominantly consist of nouns (~700), verbs (~300), and adjectives (~200), showing how East Germanic influence reached the core lexical categories. In addition, Luthic incorporated numerous loanwords from West Germanic languages during the Early Middle Ages. | ||
| Line 98: | Line 97: | ||
Throughout the 19th century, the formalisation of historical linguistics provided new tools for analysing Luthic. Comparative methodologies, inspired by the works of philologists such as Franz Bopp and August Schleicher, were applied to Luthic studies, further refining the understanding of its phonological and morphological shifts. By the early 20th century, Luthic linguistics had matured into a structured academic field, with dedicated university departments, linguistic societies, and journals exploring its diachronic development. | Throughout the 19th century, the formalisation of historical linguistics provided new tools for analysing Luthic. Comparative methodologies, inspired by the works of philologists such as Franz Bopp and August Schleicher, were applied to Luthic studies, further refining the understanding of its phonological and morphological shifts. By the early 20th century, Luthic linguistics had matured into a structured academic field, with dedicated university departments, linguistic societies, and journals exploring its diachronic development. | ||
==Place within the Indo-European languages== | |||
[[File:Luthic Indo-European family.png|thumb|250px|Adapted from Mandrak 2008.]] | [[File:Luthic Indo-European family.png|thumb|250px|Adapted from Mandrak 2008.]] | ||
The precise classification of Luthic within the Indo-European family has long been contested. While its earliest stages display strong Gothic influence, particularly in phonology and orthography, its vocabulary and syntax reveal deep affinities with Romance, especially the Italo-Dalmatian branch. As a result, Luthic is generally regarded as a transitional language, straddling the boundary between the Gallo-Romance and East Germanic groups. | The precise classification of Luthic within the Indo-European family has long been contested. While its earliest stages display strong Gothic influence, particularly in phonology and orthography, its vocabulary and syntax reveal deep affinities with Romance, especially the Italo-Dalmatian branch. As a result, Luthic is generally regarded as a transitional language, straddling the boundary between the Gallo-Romance and East Germanic groups. | ||
| Line 129: | Line 128: | ||
Nearly all Romance languages spoken in Italy are native to their respective regions. Apart from Standard Italian, these languages are commonly referred to as dialetti (“dialects”), both in colloquial and scholarly contexts, although alternative labels such as “minority languages” or “vernaculars” are also used in certain classifications. Italian was officially declared the national language during the Fascist period, specifically through the R.D.L. decree of 15 October 1925, Sull'Obbligo della lingua italiana in tutti gli uffici giudiziari del Regno, salvo le eccezioni stabilite nei trattati internazionali per la città di Fiume. According to UNESCO’s Atlas of the World’s Languages in Danger, Italy is currently home to 32 endangered languages. | Nearly all Romance languages spoken in Italy are native to their respective regions. Apart from Standard Italian, these languages are commonly referred to as dialetti (“dialects”), both in colloquial and scholarly contexts, although alternative labels such as “minority languages” or “vernaculars” are also used in certain classifications. Italian was officially declared the national language during the Fascist period, specifically through the R.D.L. decree of 15 October 1925, Sull'Obbligo della lingua italiana in tutti gli uffici giudiziari del Regno, salvo le eccezioni stabilite nei trattati internazionali per la città di Fiume. According to UNESCO’s Atlas of the World’s Languages in Danger, Italy is currently home to 32 endangered languages. | ||
==Lexis== | |||
[[File:Luthic_lexis_1.png|thumb]] | [[File:Luthic_lexis_1.png|thumb]] | ||
It is generally estimated that Luthic comprises around 260,000 words—or about 380,000 when obsolete forms are included—and roughly 4 million if declined and conjugated variants are taken into account. Nevertheless, 98% of contemporary Luthic usage relies on only 3,600 words. A 2016 study by Lúcia Yamane, based on a corpus of 2,581 words selected according to frequency, semantic richness, and productivity, also incorporates lexical items formed within the Luthic territory. This study provides the following percentages: | It is generally estimated that Luthic comprises around 260,000 words—or about 380,000 when obsolete forms are included—and roughly 4 million if declined and conjugated variants are taken into account. Nevertheless, 98% of contemporary Luthic usage relies on only 3,600 words. A 2016 study by Lúcia Yamane, based on a corpus of 2,581 words selected according to frequency, semantic richness, and productivity, also incorporates lexical items formed within the Luthic territory. This study provides the following percentages: | ||
| Line 236: | Line 235: | ||
Based on the 110-word list provided by the Global Lexicostatistical Database (cf. Starostin 2016a, 2016b, 2019; Kassian, Starostin, Dybo, Chernov 2010); German Swadesh list adapted from Wunderlich 2015. Adapted for the purposes of the Ravenna University project. | Based on the 110-word list provided by the Global Lexicostatistical Database (cf. Starostin 2016a, 2016b, 2019; Kassian, Starostin, Dybo, Chernov 2010); German Swadesh list adapted from Wunderlich 2015. Adapted for the purposes of the Ravenna University project. | ||
===Comparison=== | |||
{| class="wikitable" | {| class="wikitable" | ||
| Line 294: | Line 293: | ||
|} | |} | ||
==Distribution== | |||
[[File:Ravenna linguistic map.jpg|thumb|“Languages spoken alongside Luthic”]] | [[File:Ravenna linguistic map.jpg|thumb|“Languages spoken alongside Luthic”]] | ||
Luthic is spoken mainly in Emilia-Romagna, Italy, where it is primarily spoken in Ravenna and its adjacent communes. Although Luthic is spoken almost exclusively in Emilia-Romagna, it has also been spoken outside of Italy. Luth and general Italian emigrant communities (the largest of which are to be found in the Americas) sometimes employ Luthic as their primary language. The largest concentrations of Luthic speakers are found in the provinces of Ravenna, Ferrara and Bologna (Metropolitan City of Bologna). The people of Ravenna live in tetraglossia, as Romagnol, Emilian and Italian are spoken in those provinces alongside Luthic. | Luthic is spoken mainly in Emilia-Romagna, Italy, where it is primarily spoken in Ravenna and its adjacent communes. Although Luthic is spoken almost exclusively in Emilia-Romagna, it has also been spoken outside of Italy. Luth and general Italian emigrant communities (the largest of which are to be found in the Americas) sometimes employ Luthic as their primary language. The largest concentrations of Luthic speakers are found in the provinces of Ravenna, Ferrara and Bologna (Metropolitan City of Bologna). The people of Ravenna live in tetraglossia, as Romagnol, Emilian and Italian are spoken in those provinces alongside Luthic. | ||
| Line 316: | Line 315: | ||
Most of the Luths also speak Italian, this is commoner for Luth elders, and most of the Luth elders may speak only Italian because of the influence from the Fascist period, as the Fascist government endorsed a stringent education policy in Italy aiming at eliminating illiteracy, which was a serious problem in Italy at the time, as well as improving the allegiance of Italians to the state. The Fascist government’s first minister of education from 1922 to 1924 Giovanni Gentile recommended that education policy should focus on indoctrination of students into Fascism and to educate youth to respect and be obedient to authority. In 1929, education policy took a major step towards being completely taken over by the agenda of indoctrination.> In that year, the Fascist government took control of the authorization of all textbooks, all secondary school teachers were required to take an oath of loyalty to Fascism and children began to be taught that they owed the same loyalty to Fascism as they did to God. In 1933, all university teachers were required to be members of the National Fascist Party. From the 1930s to 1940s, Italy’s education focused on the history of Italy, displaying Italy as a force of civilization during the Roman era, displaying the rebirth of Italian nationalism and the struggle for Italian independence and unity during the Risorgimento. In the late 1930s, the Fascist government copied Nazi Germany’s education system on the issue of physical fitness and began an agenda that demanded that Italians become physically healthy. Intellectual talent in Italy was rewarded and promoted by the Fascist government through the Royal Academy of Italy which was created in 1926 to promote and coordinate Italy’s intellectual activity. | Most of the Luths also speak Italian, this is commoner for Luth elders, and most of the Luth elders may speak only Italian because of the influence from the Fascist period, as the Fascist government endorsed a stringent education policy in Italy aiming at eliminating illiteracy, which was a serious problem in Italy at the time, as well as improving the allegiance of Italians to the state. The Fascist government’s first minister of education from 1922 to 1924 Giovanni Gentile recommended that education policy should focus on indoctrination of students into Fascism and to educate youth to respect and be obedient to authority. In 1929, education policy took a major step towards being completely taken over by the agenda of indoctrination.> In that year, the Fascist government took control of the authorization of all textbooks, all secondary school teachers were required to take an oath of loyalty to Fascism and children began to be taught that they owed the same loyalty to Fascism as they did to God. In 1933, all university teachers were required to be members of the National Fascist Party. From the 1930s to 1940s, Italy’s education focused on the history of Italy, displaying Italy as a force of civilization during the Roman era, displaying the rebirth of Italian nationalism and the struggle for Italian independence and unity during the Risorgimento. In the late 1930s, the Fascist government copied Nazi Germany’s education system on the issue of physical fitness and began an agenda that demanded that Italians become physically healthy. Intellectual talent in Italy was rewarded and promoted by the Fascist government through the Royal Academy of Italy which was created in 1926 to promote and coordinate Italy’s intellectual activity. | ||
==Phonology== | |||
Luthic phonology is defined by a comparatively simple vocalic system and a consonantal inventory that varies across regional varieties. The standard form, in its most complete form, counts up to eight oral vowels, five nasal vowels, two semivowels, and twenty-six consonants, though certain dialects show a more reduced consonant set alongside an expanded vowel space. Vowels are regularly lowered and retracted before /w/ (e.g. [ë̞, o̞, æ̈, ʌ, ɒ, ɑ]) and raised and fronted before /j/ (e.g. [u, e̟, o̟, ɛ̝, ɐ̝, ɔ̝, ä̝]). In areas under strong Gallo-Italic influence, particularly Lombard and Piedmontese, rounding before /w/ produces additional allophonic series ([ø, o, œ, ɐ͗, ɔ, a͗] → [ø̞̈, o̞, æ̹̈, ɔ, ɒ, ɒ]). These patterns account for the perception of “more vowels and fewer consonants” in some varieties. Historically, this phonological profile crystallised in Ravenna, where Gothic, Frankish, Langobardic, Lepontic, and Cisalpine Gaulish elements were absorbed into the local Vulgar Latin. By the 6th century, Luthic had already become the vernacular of Ravenna, its conservative base providing the foundation for the modern system described below. | Luthic phonology is defined by a comparatively simple vocalic system and a consonantal inventory that varies across regional varieties. The standard form, in its most complete form, counts up to eight oral vowels, five nasal vowels, two semivowels, and twenty-six consonants, though certain dialects show a more reduced consonant set alongside an expanded vowel space. Vowels are regularly lowered and retracted before /w/ (e.g. [ë̞, o̞, æ̈, ʌ, ɒ, ɑ]) and raised and fronted before /j/ (e.g. [u, e̟, o̟, ɛ̝, ɐ̝, ɔ̝, ä̝]). In areas under strong Gallo-Italic influence, particularly Lombard and Piedmontese, rounding before /w/ produces additional allophonic series ([ø, o, œ, ɐ͗, ɔ, a͗] → [ø̞̈, o̞, æ̹̈, ɔ, ɒ, ɒ]). These patterns account for the perception of “more vowels and fewer consonants” in some varieties. Historically, this phonological profile crystallised in Ravenna, where Gothic, Frankish, Langobardic, Lepontic, and Cisalpine Gaulish elements were absorbed into the local Vulgar Latin. By the 6th century, Luthic had already become the vernacular of Ravenna, its conservative base providing the foundation for the modern system described below. | ||
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center" | {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center" | ||
| Line 454: | Line 453: | ||
* Within triphthongs, vowel quality is mostly in free variation, except in /jwo/ and /jwɔ/, where the quality is more stable. In regions influenced by Gallo-Italic languages, these clusters in /jw/ may also be reduced to [ɥ]. | * Within triphthongs, vowel quality is mostly in free variation, except in /jwo/ and /jwɔ/, where the quality is more stable. In regions influenced by Gallo-Italic languages, these clusters in /jw/ may also be reduced to [ɥ]. | ||
===Phonotactics=== | |||
Luthic allows up to three consonants in syllable-initial position, although there are some restrictions. Its syllable structure can be represented as (C)(C)(C)V(C)(C)(C). As in English, many words begin with three consonants. Luthic lacks true bimoraic vowels; what appear as diphthongs are actually sequences of a semiconsonantal glide [j] or [w] plus a vowel. | Luthic allows up to three consonants in syllable-initial position, although there are some restrictions. Its syllable structure can be represented as (C)(C)(C)V(C)(C)(C). As in English, many words begin with three consonants. Luthic lacks true bimoraic vowels; what appear as diphthongs are actually sequences of a semiconsonantal glide [j] or [w] plus a vowel. | ||
| Line 517: | Line 516: | ||
|} | |} | ||
===Prosody=== | |||
Luthic is quasi-paroxytonic, meaning that most words receive stress on the penultimate syllable. Monosyllabic words generally lack stress unless emphasised or accentuated. Enclitic and other unstressed personal pronouns do not affect stress patterns. Some monosyllabic words may carry natural stress, though it is weaker than the stress found in polysyllabic words. | Luthic is quasi-paroxytonic, meaning that most words receive stress on the penultimate syllable. Monosyllabic words generally lack stress unless emphasised or accentuated. Enclitic and other unstressed personal pronouns do not affect stress patterns. Some monosyllabic words may carry natural stress, though it is weaker than the stress found in polysyllabic words. | ||
| Line 528: | Line 527: | ||
* broþar + -scape > broþarscape [ˌbroˑ.dɐrˈska.pe]. | * broþar + -scape > broþarscape [ˌbroˑ.dɐrˈska.pe]. | ||
==Orthography== | |||
Luthic has a shallow orthography, meaning that spelling is highly regular and corresponds almost one-to-one with sounds. In linguistic terms, the writing system is close to a phonemic orthography. The most important exceptions are the following: | Luthic has a shallow orthography, meaning that spelling is highly regular and corresponds almost one-to-one with sounds. In linguistic terms, the writing system is close to a phonemic orthography. The most important exceptions are the following: | ||
| Line 547: | Line 546: | ||
The Luthic alphabet is considered to consist of 22 letters; j, k, w, x, y are excluded, and often avoided in loanwords, as tassi vs taxi, cenophobo vs xenofobo, gine vs jeans, Giorche vs York, Valsar vs Walsar. Loanwords are also changed to fit into regular declension patterns, as seen in gine. | The Luthic alphabet is considered to consist of 22 letters; j, k, w, x, y are excluded, and often avoided in loanwords, as tassi vs taxi, cenophobo vs xenofobo, gine vs jeans, Giorche vs York, Valsar vs Walsar. Loanwords are also changed to fit into regular declension patterns, as seen in gine. | ||
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center; width:60%; table-layout:fixed;" | {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center; width:60%; table-layout:fixed;" | ||
| Line 608: | Line 599: | ||
| Z, z || zi [ˈt͡si] || zetta [ˈt͡sɛt.te] || /t͡s/ or /d͡z/ || — | | Z, z || zi [ˈt͡si] || zetta [ˈt͡sɛt.te] || /t͡s/ or /d͡z/ || — | ||
|} | |} | ||
Letters not used in Luthic have a conventional name in modern Luthic. | |||
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center; width:60%; table-layout:fixed;" | |||
|+ Additional Letters | |||
! style="width:20%;" | J, j | |||
! style="width:20%;" | K, k | |||
! style="width:20%;" | W, w | |||
! style="width:20%;" | X, x | |||
! style="width:20%;" | Y, y | |||
|- | |||
| giotta || cappa || doppiu vi || isse || i grieca | |||
|- | |||
| [ˈd͡ʒɔt.te] || [ˈkap.pe] || [ˌdop.pju ˈvi] || [ˈis.se] || [ˌi ˈgrjɛ.ke] | |||
|} | |||
==Grammar== | |||
This section provides a concise introduction to Luthic grammar, outlining the fundamental features that shape its structure. It is not intended as an exhaustive treatment, but rather as a summary of the most salient aspects of morphology and syntax. Readers without prior knowledge of Luthic may find this overview a useful foundation. Those already familiar with these concepts may consider the section optional, as its purpose is to establish the essentials before addressing the historical and etymological developments of Luthic morphophonology in later chapters. | |||
===Nouns=== | |||
Nouns inflect for case—ordered as nominative, genitive, dative, and accusative in Luthic grammar—, as well as for number, and are classified into three grammatical genders (masculine, feminine, and neuter). Number is expressed through singular and plural in nouns, while the dual survives only in the personal pronominal system. Luthic nouns are grouped into five main declensional classes: | |||
* 1. masculine, ending in -u; | |||
* 2. feminine, ending in -a; | |||
* 3. neuter, ending in -o; | |||
* 4. masculine and feminine, ending in -e; | |||
* 5. masculine, feminine and neuter, ending in -u. | |||
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center; width:20%; table-layout:fixed;" | |||
|+ Class 1 | |||
! style="width:33%;" | Case | |||
! style="width:33%;" | sg. | |||
! style="width:33%;" | pl. | |||
|- | |||
! nom. | |||
| -u || -i | |||
|- | |||
! gen. | |||
| -i || -i | |||
|- | |||
! acc. | |||
| -o || -e | |||
|- | |||
! dat. | |||
| -a || -a | |||
|} | |||
* Examples: domnu “lord, sir” m, figliu “son” m. | |||
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center; width:20%; table-layout:fixed;" | |||
|+ Class 2 | |||
! style="width:33%;" | Case | |||
! style="width:33%;" | sg. | |||
! style="width:33%;" | pl. | |||
|- | |||
! nom. | |||
| -a || -e | |||
|- | |||
! gen. | |||
| -e || -o | |||
|- | |||
! acc. | |||
| -a || -i | |||
|- | |||
! dat. | |||
| -e || -o | |||
|} | |||
* Examples: geva “gift” f, mesa “table” f. | |||
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center; width:20%; table-layout:fixed;" | |||
|+ Class 3 | |||
! style="width:33%;" | Case | |||
! style="width:33%;" | sg. | |||
! style="width:33%;" | pl. | |||
|- | |||
! nom. | |||
| -o || -a | |||
|- | |||
! gen. | |||
| -i || -i | |||
|- | |||
! acc. | |||
| -o || -a | |||
|- | |||
! dat. | |||
| -a || -a | |||
|} | |||
* Examples: agrano “fruit” n, bello “war” n. | |||
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center; width:20%; table-layout:fixed;" | |||
|+ Class 4m. | |||
! style="width:33%;" | Case | |||
! style="width:33%;" | sg. | |||
! style="width:33%;" | pl. | |||
|- | |||
! nom. | |||
| -e || -i | |||
|- | |||
! gen. | |||
| -i || -i | |||
|- | |||
! acc. | |||
| -e || -i | |||
|- | |||
! dat. | |||
| -a || -i | |||
|} | |||
* Examples: staþe “place” m, amore “love m. | |||
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center; width:20%; table-layout:fixed;" | |||
|+ Class 4f. | |||
! style="width:33%;" | Case | |||
! style="width:33%;" | sg. | |||
! style="width:33%;" | pl. | |||
|- | |||
! nom. | |||
| -e || -i | |||
|- | |||
! gen. | |||
| -e || -o | |||
|- | |||
! acc. | |||
| -e || -i | |||
|- | |||
! dat. | |||
| -e || -i | |||
|} | |||
* Examples: qene “wife” f, ette “property” f | |||
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center; width:20%; table-layout:fixed;" | |||
|+ Class 5m. | |||
! style="width:33%;" | Case | |||
! style="width:33%;" | sg. | |||
! style="width:33%;" | pl. | |||
|- | |||
! nom. | |||
| -u || -iu | |||
|- | |||
! gen. | |||
| -i || -evi | |||
|- | |||
! acc. | |||
| -u || -i | |||
|- | |||
! dat. | |||
| -uo || -o | |||
|} | |||
* Examples: þornu “thorn” m, portu “port, harbor” m. | |||
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center; width:20%; table-layout:fixed;" | |||
|+ Class 5f. | |||
! style="width:33%;" | Case | |||
! style="width:33%;" | sg. | |||
! style="width:33%;" | pl. | |||
|- | |||
! nom. | |||
| -u || -iu | |||
|- | |||
! gen. | |||
| -i || -evo | |||
|- | |||
! acc. | |||
| -u || -i | |||
|- | |||
! dat. | |||
| -uo || -o | |||
|} | |||
* Examples; andu “hand” f, ieþu “manner” f. | |||
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center; width:20%; table-layout:fixed;" | |||
|+ Class 5n. | |||
! style="width:33%;" | Case | |||
! style="width:33%;" | sg. | |||
! style="width:33%;" | pl. | |||
|- | |||
! nom. | |||
| -u || -ua | |||
|- | |||
! gen. | |||
| -i || -evi | |||
|- | |||
! acc. | |||
| -u || -ua | |||
|- | |||
! dat. | |||
| -uo || -o | |||
|} | |||
* Examples: fièu “wealth” n, cornu “horn (musical instrument)” n | |||
There are a few minor classes, inherited directly from Gothic, called n-stems, which have four regular classes | |||
* 1n. masculine, ending in -o; | |||
* 2n. feminine, ending in -o; | |||
* 3n. neuter, ending in -o; | |||
* 4n. feminine, ending in -i; | |||
* 1r. masculine and feminine, ending in -ar. | |||
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center; width:20%; table-layout:fixed;" | |||
|+ Class 1n. | |||
! style="width:33%;" | Case | |||
! style="width:33%;" | sg. | |||
! style="width:33%;" | pl. | |||
|- | |||
! nom. | |||
| -o || -e | |||
|- | |||
! gen. | |||
| -i || -ani | |||
|- | |||
! acc. | |||
| -a || -e | |||
|- | |||
! dat. | |||
| -i || -a | |||
|} | |||
* Examples: biomo “flower” m, gomo “man” m. | |||
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center; width:20%; table-layout:fixed;" | |||
|+ Class 2n. | |||
! style="width:33%;" | Case | |||
! style="width:33%;" | sg. | |||
! style="width:33%;" | pl. | |||
|- | |||
! nom. | |||
| -o || -i | |||
|- | |||
! gen. | |||
| -i || -ono | |||
|- | |||
! acc. | |||
| -o || -i | |||
|- | |||
! dat. | |||
| -o || -o | |||
|} | |||
* Examples: toggo “tongue” f, aglo “trouble” f. | |||
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center; width:20%; table-layout:fixed;" | |||
|+ Class 3n. | |||
! style="width:33%;" | Case | |||
! style="width:33%;" | sg. | |||
! style="width:33%;" | pl. | |||
|- | |||
! nom. | |||
| -o || -ona | |||
|- | |||
! gen. | |||
| -i || -ani | |||
|- | |||
! acc. | |||
| -o || -ona | |||
|- | |||
! dat. | |||
| -i || -a | |||
|} | |||
* Examples: uogo “eye” n, erto “heart” n. | |||
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center; width:20%; table-layout:fixed;" | |||
|+ Class 4n. | |||
! style="width:33%;" | Case | |||
! style="width:33%;" | sg. | |||
! style="width:33%;" | pl. | |||
|- | |||
! nom. | |||
| -i || -i | |||
|- | |||
! gen. | |||
| -i || -ino | |||
|- | |||
! acc. | |||
| -i || -i | |||
|- | |||
! dat. | |||
| -i || -i | |||
|} | |||
* Examples: froþi “wisdom” f, ieþi “mother” f. | |||
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center; width:20%; table-layout:fixed;" | |||
|+ 1r.m. | |||
! style="width:33%;" | Case | |||
! style="width:33%;" | sg. | |||
! style="width:33%;" | pl. | |||
|- | |||
! nom. | |||
| -ar || -riu | |||
|- | |||
! gen. | |||
| -ri || -ri | |||
|- | |||
! acc. | |||
| -re || -ri | |||
|- | |||
! dat. | |||
| -er || -ro | |||
|} | |||
* Examples: faþar “father” m, broþar “brother” m. | |||
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center; width:20%; table-layout:fixed;" | |||
|+ 1r.f. | |||
! style="width:33%;" | Case | |||
! style="width:33%;" | sg. | |||
! style="width:33%;" | pl. | |||
|- | |||
! nom. | |||
| -ar || -riu | |||
|- | |||
! gen. | |||
| -ri || -ro | |||
|- | |||
! acc. | |||
| -re || -ri | |||
|- | |||
! dat. | |||
| -er || -ro | |||
|} | |||
* Examples: dottar “daughter” f, svestar “sister” f. | |||
A last irregular class is derived from Latin, namely the suffix -tās, which is classified as Class 4d. | |||
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center; width:20%; table-layout:fixed;" | |||
|+ Class 4d | |||
! style="width:33%;" | Case | |||
! style="width:33%;" | sg. | |||
! style="width:33%;" | pl. | |||
|- | |||
! nom. | |||
| -tá || -tadi | |||
|- | |||
! gen. | |||
| -tadi || -tado | |||
|- | |||
! acc. | |||
| -tade || -tadi | |||
|- | |||
! dat. | |||
| -tada || -tadi | |||
|} | |||
* Examples: fregiatá “freedom” f, magetá “ability” f. | |||
===Adjectives=== | |||
Adjectives may occur either before or after the noun. The default, unmarked position is postnominal. In prenominal, the adjective can also convey nuances of meaning, such as restrictiveness or contrastive emphasis. | |||
* Unmarked: ienu buocu rossu “a red book”; | |||
* Marked: ienu rossu buocu “a book that is red”. | |||
Adjectives inflect for case, gender, and number, following paradigms that are formally identical to those of nouns. They are distributed across Classes 1, 2, 3 and 4. | |||
Luthic marks comparison through two grammatical constructions: comparative and superlative, typically formed with the suffixes -esu and -íssimu (declined in Classes 1, 2 and 3 according to the gender), respectively. A number of irregular forms also occur, mostly due to suppletion. | |||
* Comparative: ienu buonu dagu “a good day” > ienu bateso dagu “a better day”; | |||
* Superlative: rasna varma “warm house” > sa rasna varnissima “the warmest house”. | |||
Superlative forms always take a definite article. Furthermore, Luthic adjectives have a weak declension inherited from Gothic, which occurs after a demonstrative or a definite article, and is identical to Classes 1n, 2n and 3n. There are no weak forms equivalent to comparative and superlative. Comparative is also declined like Classes 1n, 2n and 3n. | |||
===Pronouns=== | |||
Pronouns in Luthic form a distinct subsystem of the grammar, preserving both archaisms inherited from Indo-European and introducing unique innovations. They inflect for case, number, and (in most forms) gender. Unlike nouns and adjectives, however, the first- and second-person personal pronouns retain the dual number, which otherwise survives only in this domain. The pronominal system comprises personal, possessive, demonstrative, relative, interrogative, and indefinite forms, each with its own declensional patterns and functions. First and second personal pronouns also have a special comitative form. | |||
====Personal pronouns==== | |||
The subject pronoun is typically omitted, since distinctive verb conjugations make it redundant. When expressed, subject pronouns carry emphatic force. | |||
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center; width:25%; table-layout:fixed;" | |||
|+ 1st person | |||
! style="width:25%;" | Case | |||
! style="width:25%;" | sg. | |||
! style="width:25%;" | du. | |||
! style="width:25%;" | pl. | |||
|- | |||
! nom. | |||
| ec || ve || vi | |||
|- | |||
! gen. | |||
| mina || ogcara || nostra | |||
|- | |||
! acc. | |||
| mec || ogche || noi | |||
|- | |||
! dat. | |||
| me || ogche || noi | |||
|- | |||
! com. | |||
| meco || usco || nosco | |||
|} | |||
The dual number in Luthic, as mentioned before, is restricted to first- and second-person pronouns. It specifically denotes “we two” or “you two,” contrasting with the plural forms that refer to three or more. The following examples illustrate the difference between omitted and emphatic subject pronouns, as well as the special addressee function of the dual: | |||
* (no pronoun) rogio. → I speak. | |||
* (emphatic) ec rogio. → I speak (indeed) / It is I who speak. | |||
* (no pronoun) qeþi. → We two (without clusivity distinction) talk. | |||
* (emphatic) ve qeþi. → We two (inclusive pronoun) talk. | |||
* (no pronoun) andiamu. → We all go. | |||
* (emphatic) vi andiamu. → We (restricted to our group, not others) go. | |||
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center; width:25%; table-layout:fixed;" | |||
|+ 2nd person | |||
! style="width:25%;" | Case | |||
! style="width:25%;" | sg. | |||
! style="width:25%;" | du. | |||
! style="width:25%;" | pl. | |||
|- | |||
! nom. | |||
| þú || gio || giu | |||
|- | |||
! gen. | |||
| þina || egqara || vostra | |||
|- | |||
! acc. | |||
| þuc || egqe || voi | |||
|- | |||
! dat. | |||
| þu || egqe || voi | |||
|- | |||
! com. | |||
| þuco || isco || vosco | |||
|} | |||
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center; width:25%; table-layout:fixed;" | |||
|+ 3rd person sg. | |||
! style="width:25%;" | Case | |||
! style="width:25%;" | m. | |||
! style="width:25%;" | f. | |||
! style="width:25%;" | n. | |||
|- | |||
! nom. | |||
| e || gia || eta | |||
|- | |||
! gen. | |||
| e || esi || e | |||
|- | |||
! acc. | |||
| ena || gia || eta | |||
|- | |||
! dat. | |||
| emma || emma || emma | |||
|} | |||
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center; width:25%; table-layout:fixed;" | |||
|+ 3rd person pl. | |||
! style="width:25%;" | Case | |||
! style="width:25%;" | m. | |||
! style="width:25%;" | f. | |||
! style="width:25%;" | n. | |||
|- | |||
! nom. | |||
| i || gi || gia | |||
|- | |||
! gen. | |||
| esi || eso || esi | |||
|- | |||
! acc. | |||
| i || gi || gia | |||
|- | |||
! dat. | |||
| i || i || i | |||
|} | |||
====Possessive pronouns==== | |||
Possessive pronouns in Luthic agree with the possessed noun in gender, number, and case, much like adjectives, and can appear either before or after the noun they modify. Their primary function is to indicate ownership or close association, and in most cases they behave morphologically as regular adjectives. Possessive pronouns lack a weak form. | |||
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center; width:35%; table-layout:fixed;" | |||
|+ "my" | |||
! style="width:25%;" | Case | |||
! style="width:25%;" | m. | |||
! style="width:25%;" | f. | |||
! style="width:25%;" | n. | |||
|- | |||
! colspan="4" | Singular | |||
|- | |||
! nom. | |||
| minu || mina || mino | |||
|- | |||
! gen. | |||
| mini || mine || mini | |||
|- | |||
! acc. | |||
| mino || mina || mino | |||
|- | |||
! dat. | |||
| mina || mine || mina | |||
|- | |||
! colspan="4" | Plural | |||
|- | |||
! nom. | |||
| mini || mine || mina | |||
|- | |||
! gen. | |||
| mini || mino || mini | |||
|- | |||
! acc. | |||
| mine || mine || mina | |||
|- | |||
! dat. | |||
| mina || mino || mina | |||
|} | |||
Notoriously, all possessive constructions take the definitive article, which also agrees in gender, number and case. Some examples include: | |||
* (masculine) so minu broþar. → My brother. | |||
* (feminine) sa mina rasna. → My house. | |||
* (neuter) þata mino agrano. → My fruit. | |||
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center; width:35%; table-layout:fixed;" | |||
|+ "your, thy" | |||
! style="width:25%;" | Case | |||
! style="width:25%;" | m. | |||
! style="width:25%;" | f. | |||
! style="width:25%;" | n. | |||
|- | |||
! colspan="4" | Singular | |||
|- | |||
! nom. | |||
| þinu || þina || þino | |||
|- | |||
! gen. | |||
| þini || þine || þini | |||
|- | |||
! acc. | |||
| þino || þina || þino | |||
|- | |||
! dat. | |||
| þina || þine || þina | |||
|- | |||
! colspan="4" | Plural | |||
|- | |||
! nom. | |||
| þini || þine || þina | |||
|- | |||
! gen. | |||
| þini || þino || þini | |||
|- | |||
! acc. | |||
| þine || þine || þina | |||
|- | |||
! dat. | |||
| þina || þino || þina | |||
|} | |||
In Luthic, the third-person possessive pronouns “sinu, sina, sino” are used universally for “his,” “her,” “its,” and “their,” without distinction of gender or number in the possessor. This pattern parallels Romance languages such as Italian, where “suo, sua” likewise serve multiple functions depending on context. | |||
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center; width:35%; table-layout:fixed;" | |||
|+ "his, her, its, their" | |||
! style="width:25%;" | Case | |||
! style="width:25%;" | m. | |||
! style="width:25%;" | f. | |||
! style="width:25%;" | n. | |||
|- | |||
! colspan="4" | Singular | |||
|- | |||
! nom. | |||
| sinu || sina || sino | |||
|- | |||
! gen. | |||
| sini || sine || sini | |||
|- | |||
! acc. | |||
| sino || sina || sino | |||
|- | |||
! dat. | |||
| sina || sine || sina | |||
|- | |||
! colspan="4" | Plural | |||
|- | |||
! nom. | |||
| sini || sine || sina | |||
|- | |||
! gen. | |||
| sini || sino || sini | |||
|- | |||
! acc. | |||
| sine || sine || sina | |||
|- | |||
! dat. | |||
| sina || sino || sina | |||
|} | |||
Examples include: | |||
* (his) sa sina moþar. → His mother. | |||
* (her) so sinu vagnu. → Her car. | |||
* (their) sa sina famiglia. → Their family. | |||
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center; width:35%; table-layout:fixed;" | |||
|+ "our two" | |||
! style="width:25%;" | Case | |||
! style="width:25%;" | m. | |||
! style="width:25%;" | f. | |||
! style="width:25%;" | n. | |||
|- | |||
! colspan="4" | Singular | |||
|- | |||
! nom. | |||
| ogcru || ogcra || ogcro | |||
|- | |||
! gen. | |||
| ogcri || ogcre || ogcri | |||
|- | |||
! acc. | |||
| ogcro || ogcra || ogcro | |||
|- | |||
! dat. | |||
| ogcra || ogcre || ogcra | |||
|- | |||
! colspan="4" | Plural | |||
|- | |||
! nom. | |||
| ogcri || ogcre || ogcra | |||
|- | |||
! gen. | |||
| ogcri || ogcro || ogcri | |||
|- | |||
! acc. | |||
| ogcre || ogcre || ogcra | |||
|- | |||
! dat. | |||
| ogcra || ogcro || ogcra | |||
|} | |||
Some examples include: | |||
* Þe ogcri tue buochi. → Our two books (two books that belong to us two). | |||
* Þe ogcri figlii. → Our two children (the children that belong to us two). | |||
Note that in Luthic the possessive dual specifies both the two possessors and, in some contexts, the exact quantity of what is possessed. In the first example, the phrase denotes exactly two books belonging to us two (one for each). In the second, the number of children is unspecified, but they are understood as belonging to a couple. | |||
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center; width:35%; table-layout:fixed;" | |||
|+ "your two" | |||
! style="width:25%;" | Case | |||
! style="width:25%;" | m. | |||
! style="width:25%;" | f. | |||
! style="width:25%;" | n. | |||
|- | |||
! colspan="4" | Singular | |||
|- | |||
! nom. | |||
| egcru || egcra || egcro | |||
|- | |||
! gen. | |||
| egcri || egcre || egcri | |||
|- | |||
! acc. | |||
| egcro || egcra || egcro | |||
|- | |||
! dat. | |||
| egcra || egcre || egcra | |||
|- | |||
! colspan="4" | Plural | |||
|- | |||
! nom. | |||
| egcri || egcre || egcra | |||
|- | |||
! gen. | |||
| egcri || egcro || egcri | |||
|- | |||
! acc. | |||
| egcre || egcre || egcra | |||
|- | |||
! dat. | |||
| egcra || egcro || egcra | |||
|} | |||
Some examples include: | |||
* Þi ogcre tue tazze. → Your two cups (two cups that belong to you two). | |||
* Þe ogcri fregiondi. → Your two friends (friends that you two have). | |||
Note that in this example the possessive dual veve specifies that the cups belong to “you two.” A natural context would be three friends drinking coffee, when one points to the cups of the other two and says: “your two cups.” Here the dual makes explicit that the possession is limited to exactly those two people and each having a cup, distinguishing it from a plural form that might include others. In the second phrase, the number of friends of the two listeners is not specific. | |||
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center; width:35%; table-layout:fixed;" | |||
|+ "our" | |||
! style="width:25%;" | Case | |||
! style="width:25%;" | m. | |||
! style="width:25%;" | f. | |||
! style="width:25%;" | n. | |||
|- | |||
! colspan="4" | Singular | |||
|- | |||
! nom. | |||
| nostru || nostra || nostro | |||
|- | |||
! gen. | |||
| nostri || nostre || nostri | |||
|- | |||
! acc. | |||
| nostro || nostra || nostro | |||
|- | |||
! dat. | |||
| nostra || nostre || nostra | |||
|- | |||
! colspan="4" | Plural | |||
|- | |||
! nom. | |||
| nostri || nostre || nostra | |||
|- | |||
! gen. | |||
| nostri || nostro || nostri | |||
|- | |||
! acc. | |||
| nostri || nostre || nostra | |||
|- | |||
! dat. | |||
| nostra || nostro || nostra | |||
|} | |||
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center; width:35%; table-layout:fixed;" | |||
|+ "your" | |||
! style="width:25%;" | Case | |||
! style="width:25%;" | m. | |||
! style="width:25%;" | f. | |||
! style="width:25%;" | n. | |||
|- | |||
! colspan="4" | Singular | |||
|- | |||
! nom. | |||
| vostru || vostra || vostro | |||
|- | |||
! gen. | |||
| vostri || vostre || vostri | |||
|- | |||
! acc. | |||
| vostro || vostra || vostro | |||
|- | |||
! dat. | |||
| vostra || vostre || vostra | |||
|- | |||
! colspan="4" | Plural | |||
|- | |||
! nom. | |||
| vostri || vostre || vostra | |||
|- | |||
! gen. | |||
| vostri || vostro || vostri | |||
|- | |||
! acc. | |||
| vostri || vostre || vostra | |||
|- | |||
! dat. | |||
| vostra || vostro || vostra | |||
|} | |||
====Demonstrative pronouns==== | |||
The Luthic demonstrative system distinguishes three degrees of distance: proximal, referring to entities near the speaker; medial, for entities closer to the listener; and distal, for entities far from both speaker and listener. | |||
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center; width:35%; table-layout:fixed;" | |||
|+ Proximal | |||
! style="width:25%;" | Case | |||
! style="width:25%;" | m. | |||
! style="width:25%;" | f. | |||
! style="width:25%;" | n. | |||
|- | |||
! colspan="4" | Singular | |||
|- | |||
! nom. | |||
| este || esta || esto | |||
|- | |||
! gen. | |||
| esti || este || esti | |||
|- | |||
! acc. | |||
| esto || esta || esto | |||
|- | |||
! dat. | |||
| esta || este || esta | |||
|- | |||
! colspan="4" | Plural | |||
|- | |||
! nom. | |||
| esti || este || esta | |||
|- | |||
! gen. | |||
| esti || esto || esti | |||
|- | |||
! acc. | |||
| esti || este || esta | |||
|- | |||
! dat. | |||
| esta || esto || esta | |||
|} | |||
The proximal refers to entities near the speaker. In temporal contexts, it refers to the present. | |||
* (space) este è so minu buocu. → This (the book the speaker holds) is my book. | |||
* (time) esta veca è folla. → This (current) week is packed. | |||
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center; width:35%; table-layout:fixed;" | |||
|+ Medial | |||
! style="width:25%;" | Case | |||
! style="width:25%;" | m. | |||
! style="width:25%;" | f. | |||
! style="width:25%;" | n. | |||
|- | |||
! colspan="4" | Singular | |||
|- | |||
! nom. | |||
| esse || essa || esso | |||
|- | |||
! gen. | |||
| essi || esse || essi | |||
|- | |||
! acc. | |||
| esso || essa || esso | |||
|- | |||
! dat. | |||
| essa || esse || essa | |||
|- | |||
! colspan="4" | Plural | |||
|- | |||
! nom. | |||
| essi || esse || essa | |||
|- | |||
! gen. | |||
| essi || esso || essi | |||
|- | |||
! acc. | |||
| essi || esse || essa | |||
|- | |||
! dat. | |||
| essa || esso || essa | |||
|} | |||
The medial refers to entities near the listener. In temporal contexts, it refers to the near past or near future. | |||
* (space) essa tazza è þina? → Is that cup (near the listener) yours? | |||
* (time) esso domnico andraggio. → I’m going this Sunday. | |||
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center; width:35%; table-layout:fixed;" | |||
|+ Distal | |||
! style="width:25%;" | Case | |||
! style="width:25%;" | m. | |||
! style="width:25%;" | f. | |||
! style="width:25%;" | n. | |||
|- | |||
! colspan="4" | Singular | |||
|- | |||
! nom. | |||
| gienu || giena || gieno | |||
|- | |||
! gen. | |||
| gieni || giene || gieni | |||
|- | |||
! acc. | |||
| gieno || giena || gieno | |||
|- | |||
! dat. | |||
| giena || giene || giena | |||
|- | |||
! colspan="4" | Plural | |||
|- | |||
! nom. | |||
| gieni || giene || giena | |||
|- | |||
! gen. | |||
| gieni || gieno || gieni | |||
|- | |||
! acc. | |||
| giene || giene || giena | |||
|- | |||
! dat. | |||
| giena || gieno || giena | |||
|} | |||
The distal refers to entities far from the speaker and the listener. In temporal contexts, it refers to the distant past and distant future. | |||
* (space) sevisti gieno ondo? → Did you see that dog? | |||
* (time) gieno attomo giero fú buono. → This last year was good. | |||
====Relative pronouns==== | |||
Luthic uses distinct relative pronouns depending on the type of antecedent. For people or things, the quasi-indeclinable pronoun í is used, with the genitive form ei serving as “whose.” For places, the relative pronoun var is employed, while van is used to refer to time. These pronouns consistently introduce relative clauses and do not change according to number or case. | |||
* S’ondu, í ar stava è fiú carinu. → The dog that was here is very cute. | |||
* Adelaida è sa ragazza, meþ í aþþa Francia vratoraggio. → Adelaida is the girl with whom I will travel to France. | |||
* Este è so manno, ei sunu ieri qemé. → This is the man whose son arrived yesterday. | |||
* È ‘na segguatrice, ei þ'arvèþe ammiro. → She is a singer whose work I admire. | |||
* So staþe var buo è ferra sa mina ufficia. → The place where I live is far from my office. | |||
* Andavo sa mina ieþi van so minu faþar arrivò. → I was walking with my mother when my father arrived. | |||
When using the relative pronoun í and its genitive variation for people or things, the relative clause is set off by a comma. | |||
====Interrogative pronouns==== | |||
Interrogative pronouns in Luthic are used to form questions about persons, objects, or qualities. | |||
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center; width:35%; table-layout:fixed;" | |||
|+ what | |||
! style="width:25%;" | Case | |||
! style="width:25%;" | m. | |||
! style="width:25%;" | f. | |||
! style="width:25%;" | n. | |||
|- | |||
! nom. | |||
| vo || va || vata | |||
|- | |||
! gen. | |||
| ve || vesi || ve | |||
|- | |||
! acc. | |||
| vana || va || vata | |||
|- | |||
! dat. | |||
| vamma || vamma || vamma | |||
|} | |||
* (interrogative) who, what. | |||
* (interrogative, in genitive) whose. | |||
* (interrogative, in accusative and dative) whom. | |||
* (interrogative, in dative) with whom, with what, how, in what way. | |||
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center; width:35%; table-layout:fixed;" | |||
|+ which | |||
! style="width:25%;" | Case | |||
! style="width:25%;" | m. | |||
! style="width:25%;" | f. | |||
! style="width:25%;" | n. | |||
|- | |||
! colspan="4" | Singular | |||
|- | |||
! nom. | |||
| vaie || vaia || vai | |||
|- | |||
! gen. | |||
| vaie || vaisi || vaie | |||
|- | |||
! acc. | |||
| vaiana || vaia || vai | |||
|- | |||
! dat. | |||
| vaiamma || vaiamma || vaiamma | |||
|- | |||
! colspan="4" | Plural | |||
|- | |||
! nom. | |||
| vaie || vaii || vaia | |||
|- | |||
! gen. | |||
| vaisi || vaiso || vaisi | |||
|- | |||
! acc. | |||
| vaie || vaii || vaia | |||
|- | |||
! dat. | |||
| vaie || vaie || vaie | |||
|} | |||
====Indefinite pronouns==== | |||
Indefinite pronouns in Luthic express general or nonspecific reference to persons, objects, or quantities. They include forms equivalent to someone, something, anyone, nothing, and so on. | |||
* (some) ieni, iene, iena (Classes 1, 2 & 3 plurale tantum); | |||
* (all) alli, alle, alla (Classes 1, 2 & 3 plurale tantum); | |||
* (each) almanno (Class 1n); | |||
* (any) ullu (Class 1); | |||
* (something) vocosa (Class 2); | |||
* (nothing) necosa (Class 2); | |||
* (everything) alcosa (Class 2); | |||
* (anything) ulcosa (Class 2); | |||
* (someone, somebody, anyone, anybody) vomanno (Class 1n), persona (Class 2); | |||
* (none, no one, nobody) nemanno (Class 1n); | |||
* (everyone, everybody) manne (Class 1n plurale tantum); | |||
* (anyone, anybody) vogqa (Class 2); | |||
* (nowhere, anywhere, somewhere, everywhere) varogqa (Class 2). | |||
===Articles=== | |||
Articles in Luthic function as markers of definiteness and indefiniteness. As in the Romance languages, they agree with the noun in gender and number. The definite article is obligatory before possessives and many other noun phrases, while the indefinite article is used primarily in the singular. | |||
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center; width:35%; table-layout:fixed;" | |||
|+ the | |||
! style="width:25%;" | Case | |||
! style="width:25%;" | m. | |||
! style="width:25%;" | f. | |||
! style="width:25%;" | n. | |||
|- | |||
! colspan="4" | Singular | |||
|- | |||
! nom. | |||
| so, s’ || sa, s’ || þata, þat’ | |||
|- | |||
! gen. | |||
| þe || þesi || þe | |||
|- | |||
! acc. | |||
| þana, þan’ || þa, þ’ || þata, þat’ | |||
|- | |||
! dat. | |||
| þamma, þamm’ || þamma, þamm’ || þamma, þamm’ | |||
|- | |||
! colspan="4" | Plural | |||
|- | |||
! nom. | |||
| þe || þi || þa | |||
|- | |||
! gen. | |||
| þesi || þeso || þesi | |||
|- | |||
! acc. | |||
| þe || þi || þa | |||
|- | |||
! dat. | |||
| þe || þe || þe | |||
|} | |||
Some examples include: | |||
* (masculine) so ragazzu. → The boy. | |||
* (feminine) sa ragazza. → The girl. | |||
* (neuter) þata lico. → The body. | |||
* (elision) þat’uoveþo. → The head. | |||
Before vowels, the article undergoes elision, resulting in the contracted form l’, which attaches directly to the following word. This process reflects the general tendency in Luthic to avoid hiatus. | |||
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center; width:35%; table-layout:fixed;" | |||
|+ a(n) | |||
! style="width:25%;" | Case | |||
! style="width:25%;" | m. | |||
! style="width:25%;" | f. | |||
! style="width:25%;" | n. | |||
|- | |||
! nom. | |||
| ienu, ien’ || iena, ien’ || ieno, ien’ | |||
|- | |||
! gen. | |||
| ieni || iene || ieni | |||
|- | |||
! acc. | |||
| ieno, ien’ || iena, ien’ || ieno, ien’ | |||
|- | |||
! dat. | |||
| iena || iene || iena | |||
|} | |||
* (initial elision) essa è ‘na rasna. → This is a house. | |||
* (terminal elision) ien’uovo. → An egg. | |||
===Verbs=== | |||
Verbs in Luthic form the backbone of sentence structure, expressing actions, states, and processes through a richly inflected system. They conjugate for person, number, tense, mood, and voice, with endings that vary according to conjugational class. | |||
====Present==== | |||
The present tense in Luthic is employed not only to describe actions taking place at the moment of speaking, but also to express habitual activities, ongoing states or conditions, and actions planned to occur in the near future. The four classes of verbs (conjugation’s patterns) are distinguished by the infinitive’s endings form of the verb: | |||
1st conjugation: -are (þorvare); | |||
2nd conjugation: -ere (credere); | |||
3rd conjugation: -ore (olore); | |||
4th conjugation: -ire (dormire). | |||
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center; width:40%; table-layout:fixed;" | |||
|+ Indicative active | |||
! style="width:20%;" | ind.act. | |||
! style="width:20%;" | -are | |||
! style="width:20%;" | -ere | |||
! style="width:20%;" | -ore | |||
! style="width:20%;" | -ire | |||
|- | |||
! ec | |||
| -o || -o || -o || -o | |||
|- | |||
! þú | |||
| -i || -i || -i || -i | |||
|- | |||
! e | |||
| -a || -e || -o || -i | |||
|- | |||
! ve | |||
| -i || -i || -i || -i | |||
|- | |||
! gio | |||
| -aze || -eze || -oze || -ize | |||
|- | |||
! vi | |||
| -iamu || -iamu || -iamu || -iamu | |||
|- | |||
! giu | |||
| -ate || -ete || -ote || -ite | |||
|- | |||
! i | |||
| -ano || -ono || -ono || -ono | |||
|} | |||
In the default active voice, the grammatical subject is the agent performing the action. Conversely, the passive voice is a construction used to shift the focus of the sentence to the patient (the receiver of the action), which then functions as the grammatical subject. The original agent, if expressed, is typically relegated to an oblique phrase. | |||
In a notable archaism, Luthic preserves a fusional passive voice. Unlike the analytical passive of modern Romance, the Luthic passive is not formed with an auxiliary verb. Instead, it is marked by a distinct set of inflectional endings applied directly to the verb stem. | |||
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center; width:40%; table-layout:fixed;" | |||
|+ Indicative passive | |||
! style="width:20%;" | Indicative passive | |||
! style="width:20%;" | -are | |||
! style="width:20%;" | -ere | |||
! style="width:20%;" | -ore | |||
! style="width:20%;" | -ire | |||
|- | |||
! ec | |||
| -ara || -era || -ora || -ira | |||
|- | |||
! þú | |||
| -asa || -esa || -osa || -isa | |||
|- | |||
! e | |||
| -aþa || -eþa || -oþa || -iþa | |||
|- | |||
! ve | |||
| -anda || -enda || -onda || -inda | |||
|- | |||
! gio | |||
| -anda || -enda || -onda || -inda | |||
|- | |||
! vi | |||
| -anda || -enda || -onda || -inda | |||
|- | |||
! giu | |||
| -anda || -enda || -onda || -inda | |||
|- | |||
! i | |||
| -anda || -enda || -onda || -inda | |||
|} | |||
In addition to the indicative mood, which is used for factual statements and objective realities, Luthic employs a distinct subjunctive mood. The subjunctive is primarily used to express subjectivity, uncertainty, or irrealis. It typically appears in subordinate clauses, often following verbs of opinion, desire, or necessity. | |||
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center; width:40%; table-layout:fixed;" | |||
|+ Subjunctive active | |||
! style="width:20%;" | Subjunctive active | |||
! style="width:20%;" | -are | |||
! style="width:20%;" | -ere | |||
! style="width:20%;" | -ore | |||
! style="width:20%;" | -ire | |||
|- | |||
! ec | |||
| -i || -a || -i || -a | |||
|- | |||
! þú | |||
| -i || -a || -i || -a | |||
|- | |||
! e | |||
| -i || -a || -i || -a | |||
|- | |||
! ve | |||
| -i || -a || -i || -a | |||
|- | |||
! gio | |||
| -iaze || -iaze || -iaze || -iaze | |||
|- | |||
! vi | |||
| -iamu || -iamu || -iamu || -iamu | |||
|- | |||
! giu | |||
| -iate || -iate || -iate || -iate | |||
|- | |||
! i | |||
| -ino || -ano || -ino || -ano | |||
|} | |||
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center; width:40%; table-layout:fixed;" | |||
|+ Subjunctive passive | |||
! style="width:20%;" | Subjunctive passive | |||
! style="width:20%;" | -are | |||
! style="width:20%;" | -ere | |||
! style="width:20%;" | -ore | |||
! style="width:20%;" | -ire | |||
|- | |||
! ec | |||
| -iruo || -aruo || -iruo || -aruo | |||
|- | |||
! þú | |||
| -isuo || -asuo || -isuo || -asuo | |||
|- | |||
! e | |||
| -iþuo || -aþuo || -iþuo || -aþuo | |||
|- | |||
! ve | |||
| -induo || -anduo || -induo || -anduo | |||
|- | |||
! gio | |||
| -induo || -anduo || -induo || -anduo | |||
|- | |||
! vi | |||
| -induo || -anduo || -induo || -anduo | |||
|- | |||
! giu | |||
| -induo || -anduo || -induo || -anduo | |||
|- | |||
! i | |||
| -induo || -anduo || -induo || -anduo | |||
|} | |||
The conditional mood in Luthic is used to express actions that are contingent upon a condition, often hypothetical or unreal. Its primary functions include: | |||
* Expressing hypothetical outcomes, typically in the apodosis of a conditional sentence; | |||
* Indicating the future from a past perspective (futūrum in praeteritō); | |||
* Softening requests or statements to convey politeness; | |||
* Conveying conjecture or probability concerning past events. | |||
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center; width:40%; table-layout:fixed;" | |||
|+ Conditional active | |||
! style="width:20%;" | Conditional active | |||
! style="width:20%;" | -are | |||
! style="width:20%;" | -ere | |||
! style="width:20%;" | -ore | |||
! style="width:20%;" | -ire | |||
|- | |||
! ec | |||
| -erebbi || -erebbi || -orebbi || -irebbi | |||
|- | |||
! þú | |||
| -eresti || -eresti || -oresti || -iresti | |||
|- | |||
! e | |||
| -erebbe || -erebbe || -orebbe || -irebbe | |||
|- | |||
! ve | |||
| -erebbi || -erebbi || -orebbi || -irebbi | |||
|- | |||
! gio | |||
| -ereze || -ereze || -oreze || -ireze | |||
|- | |||
! vi | |||
| -eremmu || -eremmu || -oremmu || -iremmu | |||
|- | |||
! giu | |||
| -ereste || -ereste || -oreste || -ireste | |||
|- | |||
! i | |||
| -erebberono || -erebberono || -orebberono || -irebberono | |||
|} | |||
Unlike in other tenses, the conditional passive is not formed with specific inflectional endings. Instead, it is constructed analytically, using the conditional present tense of the auxiliary verb ‘to be’ combined with the past participle of the main verb. The participle, in this periphrastic construction, agrees in gender and number with the grammatical subject. | |||
* (active) geverebbi þana buoco. → I would give the book. | |||
* (passive) so buocu sarebbe gevatu mina. → The book would be given by me. | |||
====Imperfect==== | |||
The imperfect is a past tense in Luthic characterised by its imperfective aspect. It stands in direct contrast to the preterite, which presents past events from a perfective viewpoint (i.e., as completed, single occurrences). The imperfect, instead, describes past situations or actions without reference to their beginning or end. Its principal functions are: | |||
* Descriptive: To set the scene or describe states and characteristics in a narrative. | |||
* Habitual: To express actions that were repeated or customary in the past. | |||
* Durative: To depict an ongoing action in the past, often providing a temporal frame that is interrupted by another event (typically expressed in the preterite). | |||
The difference between imperfective and perfective aspects can be illustrated clearly with the verb vetare. The imperfect expresses being in possession of knowledge in the past, while the perfective expresses the moment of acquiring the knowledge. | |||
* (imperfective) vetavo þa treggua. → I knew the truth. | |||
* (perfective) vetai þa treggua. → I found out the truth. | |||
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center; width:40%; table-layout:fixed;" | |||
|+ Indicative active | |||
! style="width:20%;" | Indicative active | |||
! style="width:20%;" | -are | |||
! style="width:20%;" | -ere | |||
! style="width:20%;" | -ore | |||
! style="width:20%;" | -ire | |||
|- | |||
! ec | |||
| -avo || -evo || -ovo || -ivo | |||
|- | |||
! þú | |||
| -avi || -evi || -ovi || -ivi | |||
|- | |||
! e | |||
| -ava || -eva || -ova || -iva | |||
|- | |||
! ve | |||
| -avi || -evi || -ovi || -ivi | |||
|- | |||
! gio | |||
| -avaze || -evaze || -ovaze || -ivaze | |||
|- | |||
! vi | |||
| -avamu || -evamu || -ovamu || -ivamu | |||
|- | |||
! giu | |||
| -avate || -evate || -ovate || -ivate | |||
|- | |||
! i | |||
| -avano || -evano || -ovano || -ivano | |||
|} | |||
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center; width:40%; table-layout:fixed;" | |||
|+ Indicative passive | |||
! style="width:20%;" | Indicative passive | |||
! style="width:20%;" | -are | |||
! style="width:20%;" | -ere | |||
! style="width:20%;" | -ore | |||
! style="width:20%;" | -ire | |||
|- | |||
! ec | |||
| -avara || -evara || -ovara || -ivara | |||
|- | |||
! þú | |||
| -avasa || -evasa || -ovasa || -ivasa | |||
|- | |||
! e | |||
| -avaþa || -evaþa || -ovaþa || -ivaþa | |||
|- | |||
! ve | |||
| -avanda || -evanda || -ovanda || -ivanda | |||
|- | |||
! gio | |||
| -avanda || -evanda || -ovanda || -ivanda | |||
|- | |||
! vi | |||
| -avanda || -evanda || -ovanda || -ivanda | |||
|- | |||
! giu | |||
| -avanda || -evanda || -ovanda || -ivanda | |||
|- | |||
! i | |||
| -avanda || -evanda || -ovanda || -ivanda | |||
|} | |||
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center; width:40%; table-layout:fixed;" | |||
|+ Imperfect subjunctive active | |||
! style="width:20%;" | Subjunctive active | |||
! style="width:20%;" | -are | |||
! style="width:20%;" | -ere | |||
! style="width:20%;" | -ore | |||
! style="width:20%;" | -ire | |||
|- | |||
! ec | |||
| -asse || -esse || -osse || -isse | |||
|- | |||
! þú | |||
| -assi || -essi || -ossi || -issi | |||
|- | |||
! e | |||
| -asse || -esse || -osse || -isse | |||
|- | |||
! ve | |||
| -assi || -essi || -ossi || -issi | |||
|- | |||
! gio | |||
| -assize || -essize || -ossize || -issize | |||
|- | |||
! vi | |||
| -assimu || -essimu || -ossimu || -issimu | |||
|- | |||
! giu | |||
| -assite || -essite || -ossite || -issite | |||
|- | |||
! i | |||
| -assino || -essino || -ossino || -issino | |||
|} | |||
The imperfect subjunctive mirrors the conditional mood in its passive formation, being constructed analytically. The participle, along with the imperfect subjunctive of the auxiliary verb ‘to be’, agrees in gender and number with the subject. | |||
* (active) sole si so þiuþanu þ’ordene gevasse. → Only if the king gave the order. | |||
* (passive) sole si s’ordene þamma þiuþana gevata fosse. → Only if the order were given by the king. | |||
====Perfect==== | |||
The perfect tense in Luthic is characterised by a split morphological formation that depends on its grammatical voice. In the active voice, the perfect is a fusional tense, using a distinct set of endings applied directly to the verb stem. Conversely, in the passive voice, it is constructed analytically, with the present indicative of the auxiliary verb ‘to be’ combined with the past participle. | |||
The perfect tense covers the semantic range of the preterite (a completed action in the past) and the present perfect (a past action with present relevance), the distinction is not marked morphologically and is instead determined by the context. | |||
* (preterite active) rogí vacosa. → He said something. | |||
* (perfect active) rogí vacosa. → He has said something. | |||
* (preterite passive) vacosa è rogita e. → Something was said by him. | |||
* (perfect passive) vacosa è rogita e. → Something has been said by him. | |||
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center; width:40%; table-layout:fixed;" | |||
|+ Indicative active | |||
! style="width:20%;" | Indicative active | |||
! style="width:20%;" | -are | |||
! style="width:20%;" | -ere | |||
! style="width:20%;" | -ore | |||
! style="width:20%;" | -ire | |||
|- | |||
! ec | |||
| -ái || -éi, -etti || -ói || -íi | |||
|- | |||
! þú | |||
| -asti || -esti || -osti || -isti | |||
|- | |||
! e | |||
| -ò || -é, -ette || -ò || -í | |||
|- | |||
! ve | |||
| -íi || -íi || -íi || -íi | |||
|- | |||
! gio | |||
| -aze || -eze || -oze || -ize | |||
|- | |||
! vi | |||
| -ammu || -emmu || -ommu || -immu | |||
|- | |||
! giu | |||
| -aste || -este || -oste || -iste | |||
|- | |||
! i | |||
| -arono || -erono || -orono || -irono | |||
|} | |||
In addition, an optional analytic construction also exists, mirroring the compound past tenses of other Romance languages. This form is constructed using the present indicative of the auxiliary verb ‘to have’ followed by the past participle. | |||
====Pluperfect==== | |||
The pluperfect is used to express a “past-in-the-past.” Its function is to denote an action that had already been completed before another past event or a specific point in time, thus placing it further in the past than an action expressed by the perfect tense. | |||
Similar to the perfect tense, the pluperfect’s passive voice is formed by an auxiliary verb. This construction combines the imperfect tense of the verb ‘to be’ with the past participle of the main verb. | |||
* (active) arrivammu van sa þiuþana þa lettera segelara. → We arrived when the queen had sealed the letter. | |||
* (passive) sa lettera vá segelata þesi þiuþane van arrivammu. → The letter had been sealed by the queen when we arrived. | |||
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center; width:40%; table-layout:fixed;" | |||
|+ Indicative active | |||
! style="width:20%;" | Indicative active | |||
! style="width:20%;" | -are | |||
! style="width:20%;" | -ere | |||
! style="width:20%;" | -ore | |||
! style="width:20%;" | -ire | |||
|- | |||
! ec | |||
| -aro || -ero || -oro || -iro | |||
|- | |||
! þú | |||
| -ari || -eri || -ori || -iri | |||
|- | |||
! e | |||
| -ara || -era || -ora || -ira | |||
|- | |||
! ve | |||
| -ari || -eri || -ori || -iri | |||
|- | |||
! gio | |||
| -araze || -eraze || -oraze || -iraze | |||
|- | |||
! vi | |||
| -aramu || -eramu || -oramu || -iramu | |||
|- | |||
! giu | |||
| -arate || -erate || -orate || -irate | |||
|- | |||
! i | |||
| -arano || -erano || -orano || -irano | |||
|} | |||
Like the perfect, pluperfect has an optional analytic counterpart. This alternative form is constructed with the imperfect indicative of the auxiliary verb ‘to have’ combined with the past participle of the main verb. | |||
====Future==== | |||
The future tense expresses an action that will take place at a point subsequent to the moment of speaking. It can also be used to convey probability or conjecture about the present. | |||
Its endings are a historical development from the agglutination of the verb’s full infinitive form with the present tense endings of the auxiliary verb ‘to have’, a process common throughout the Romance languages. This has resulted in a single, unified set of endings that attaches to the infinitive for all regular verbs. | |||
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center; width:40%; table-layout:fixed;" | |||
|+ Indicative active | |||
! style="width:20%;" | Indicative active | |||
! style="width:20%;" | -are | |||
! style="width:20%;" | -ere | |||
! style="width:20%;" | -ore | |||
! style="width:20%;" | -ire | |||
|- | |||
! ec | |||
| -eraggio || -eraggio || -oraggio || -iraggio | |||
|- | |||
! þú | |||
| -erái || -erái || -orái || -irái | |||
|- | |||
! e | |||
| -erá || -erá || -orá || -irá | |||
|- | |||
! ve | |||
| -erí || -erí || -orí || -irí | |||
|- | |||
! gio | |||
| -ereze || -ereze || -oreze || -ireze | |||
|- | |||
! vi | |||
| -eremu || -eremu || -oremu || -iremu | |||
|- | |||
! giu | |||
| -erete || -erete || -orete || -irete | |||
|- | |||
! i | |||
| -erano || -erano || -orano || -irano | |||
|} | |||
Passive forms follow the regular analytical construction: | |||
* (active) dregcheraggio þata vino. → I will drink the wine. | |||
* (passive) þata vino sará dregcatu mina. → The wine will be drunk by me. | |||
In addition, Luthic has a modal future formed with the present tense of the modal auxiliary verb scolare followed by the main verb’s infinitive. It is used to express a higher degree of certainty, obligation, or determination about a future event. It carries a sense of inevitability or obligation (deontic modality): | |||
* (future) bugiraggio. → I will buy (forecast). | |||
* (deontic) schio bugire. → I shall buy (obligation). | |||
It is often accompanied by a temporal adverb: | |||
* (future) bugiraggio crai. → I will buy tomorrow (forecast for tomorrow). | |||
* (deontic) schio bugire crai. → I shall buy tomorrow (obligation for tomorrow). | |||
=====Future perfect===== | |||
The future perfect is a compound tense used to describe an action that will have been completed before another point or event in the future. In the active voice, it is constructed with the future tense of the auxiliary verb ‘to have’ followed by the past participle of the main verb. In the passive voice, it employs a distinct periphrastic construction: the future tense of the auxiliary ‘to be’ is combined with the past participles of both the auxiliary ‘to have’ and the main verb. | |||
* (active) avrá togitu. → It will have done. | |||
* (passive) sará avutu togitu. → It will have been done. | |||
It should be noted that the paradigms presented in this section apply to regular verbs. Luthic also possesses a number of irregular verbs, whose forms often preserve unique historical developments. A comprehensive treatment of these verbs is beyond the scope of this introductory grammar and will be addressed in the later chapters on historical morphology. | |||
====Imperative==== | |||
The imperative mood is used to issue direct commands, requests, and prohibitions. In Luthic, its formation is distinct for affirmative and negative commands and is productive only in the second person. | |||
* Affirmative imperative: the affirmative command has specific forms for the second-person singular, dual and plural, which are derived from the verb stem. | |||
* Negative imperative (prohibition): negative commands are formed periphrastically. The prohibition is expressed by the negative particle followed by the verb’s full infinitive form. This same construction is used for both singular, dual and plural addressees. | |||
:* (prohibition) non rogire! → Do not speak! | |||
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center; width:40%; table-layout:fixed;" | |||
|+ Affirmative imperative | |||
! style="width:20%;" | Affirmative | |||
! style="width:20%;" | -are | |||
! style="width:20%;" | -ere | |||
! style="width:20%;" | -ore | |||
! style="width:20%;" | -ire | |||
|- | |||
! þú | |||
| -a || -e || -o || -i | |||
|- | |||
! gio | |||
| -aze || -eze || -oze || -ize | |||
|- | |||
! giu | |||
| -ate || -ete || -ote || -ite | |||
|} | |||
====Non-finite forms==== | |||
In addition to its finite forms, which are marked for tense and person, Luthic possesses four non-finite verb forms: the infinitive, the gerund, the present participle, and the past participle. These forms do not conjugate for person and typically function as verbal nouns or adjectives. | |||
* Infinitive | |||
:* The infinitive is the base form of the verb, functioning as a verbal noun that names the action. As previously established, it is the form used for dictionary entries and is marked by one of the four thematic endings that define the verb's conjugation class: -are, -ere, -ore, and -ire. | |||
* Participles | |||
Luthic has two participles that function as verbal adjectives, agreeing in gender, case, and number with the nouns they modify. | |||
:* Present participle: describes an ongoing action. It is formed by adding -ante on -are verbs, -ente on -ere and -ire verbs and -onte on -ore verbs. Declinable as Classes 4m and 4f. | |||
:* Past participle: describes a completed action. Its endings are -atu, -utu, -otu, and -itu, respectively, for each conjugation class (Classes 1, 2 & 3 adjectives). As shown, the past participle is the fundamental component for forming all compound tenses and analytic passive voices. | |||
* Gerund | |||
The Luthic form ending in -andu, -endu, or -ondu (depending on conjugation class) serves a dual role as both a gerund and a gerundive, a distinction inherited from Classical Latin. | |||
:* As a gerund, it functions as an Class 3 verbal noun or adverb to name an action or to express the manner of an action. | |||
:* As a gerundive, it functions as a declinable Classes 1, 2 & 3 verbal adjective, expressing necessity, obligation, or fitness. | |||
====Auxiliary verbs==== | |||
Following the discussion of compound tenses and voice, the full paradigms for the two primary auxiliary verbs, ‘to be’ and ‘to have’, are presented below. Although irregular, their foundational role in the verbal system warrants their inclusion in this section. For the sake of simplicity, compounded forms are skipped. | |||
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center; width:30%; table-layout:fixed;" | |||
|+ Non-finite forms | |||
! style="width:50%;" | Infinitive | |||
| vesare | |||
|- | |||
! Past participle | |||
| vesatu | |||
|- | |||
! Present participle | |||
| vesante | |||
|- | |||
! Gerund | |||
| vesandu | |||
|} | |||
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center; width:70%; table-layout:fixed;" | |||
|+ Indicative active | |||
! style="width:16%;" | Person | |||
! style="width:16%;" | Present | |||
! style="width:16%;" | Imperfect | |||
! style="width:16%;" | Perfect | |||
! style="width:16%;" | Pluperfect | |||
! style="width:16%;" | Future | |||
|- | |||
! ec | |||
| bio || vó || fui || foro || saraggio | |||
|- | |||
! þú | |||
| bii || ví || fosti || fori || sarái | |||
|- | |||
! e | |||
| è || vá || fú || fora || sará | |||
|- | |||
! ve | |||
| segi || ví || fui || fori || sarí | |||
|- | |||
! gio | |||
| segize || vesaze || foze || foraze || saraze | |||
|- | |||
! vi | |||
| siamu || vesamu || fummu || foramu || saremu | |||
|- | |||
! giu | |||
| siete || vesate || foste || forate || sarete | |||
|- | |||
! i | |||
| seno || vesano || furono || forano || sarano | |||
|} | |||
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center; width:50%; table-layout:fixed;" | |||
|+ Subjunctive & Conditional | |||
! style="width:25%;" | Person | |||
! style="width:25%;" | Subj. Pres. | |||
! style="width:25%;" | Subj. Imp. | |||
! style="width:25%;" | Cond. Pres. | |||
|- | |||
! ec | |||
| sia || fosse || sarebbi | |||
|- | |||
! þú | |||
| sia || fossi || saresti | |||
|- | |||
! e | |||
| sia || fosse || sarebbe | |||
|- | |||
! ve | |||
| sii || fossi || sarebbi | |||
|- | |||
! gio | |||
| siaze || fossize || sareze | |||
|- | |||
! vi | |||
| siamu || fossimu || saremmu | |||
|- | |||
! giu | |||
| siate || fossite || sareste | |||
|- | |||
! i | |||
| siano || fosseno || sarebberono | |||
|} | |||
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center; width:30%; table-layout:fixed;" | |||
|+ Imperative | |||
! style="width:34%;" | Person | |||
! style="width:33%;" | Affirmative | |||
! style="width:33%;" | Negative | |||
|- | |||
! þú | |||
| vesa || non vesare | |||
|- | |||
! gio | |||
| vesaze || non vesare | |||
|- | |||
! giu | |||
| vesate || non vesare | |||
|} | |||
* The verb vesare lacks a passive voice. This is because vesare is an intransitive copular verb; its function is to link a subject to a predicate, not to transfer an action onto a direct object. Since the passive construction requires promoting a direct object to the subject role, it is grammatically inapplicable to vesare. | |||
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center; width:30%; table-layout:fixed;" | |||
|+ Non-finite forms | |||
! style="width:50%;" | Infinitive | |||
| avere | |||
|- | |||
! Past participle | |||
| avutu | |||
|- | |||
! Present participle | |||
| avente | |||
|- | |||
! Gerund | |||
| avendu | |||
|} | |||
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center; width:70%; table-layout:fixed;" | |||
|+ Indicative active | |||
! style="width:16%;" | Person | |||
! style="width:16%;" | Present | |||
! style="width:16%;" | Imperfect | |||
! style="width:16%;" | Perfect | |||
! style="width:16%;" | Pluperfect | |||
! style="width:16%;" | Future | |||
|- | |||
! ec | |||
| aggio || avevo || ebbi || ebbero || avraggio | |||
|- | |||
! þú | |||
| ái || avevi || avesti || ebberi || avrái | |||
|- | |||
! e | |||
| á || aveva || ebbe || ebbera || avrá | |||
|- | |||
! ve | |||
| abbi || avevi || ebbi || ebberi || avrí | |||
|- | |||
! gio | |||
| aveze || avevaze || aveze || ebberaze || avreze | |||
|- | |||
! vi | |||
| abbiamu || avevamu || avemmu || ebberamu || avremu | |||
|- | |||
! giu | |||
| avete || avevate || aveste || ebberate || avrete | |||
|- | |||
! i | |||
| ano || avevano || ebberono || ebberano || avrano | |||
|} | |||
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center; width:30%; table-layout:fixed;" | |||
|+ Indicative passive | |||
! style="width:34%;" | Person | |||
! style="width:33%;" | Present | |||
! style="width:33%;" | Imperfect | |||
|- | |||
! ec | |||
| avara || avavara | |||
|- | |||
! þú | |||
| avasa || avavasa | |||
|- | |||
! e | |||
| avaþa || avavaþa | |||
|- | |||
! ve | |||
| avanda || avavanda | |||
|- | |||
! gio | |||
| avanda || avavanda | |||
|- | |||
! vi | |||
| avanda || avavanda | |||
|- | |||
! giu | |||
| avanda || avavanda | |||
|- | |||
! i | |||
| avanda || avavanda | |||
|} | |||
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center; width:50%; table-layout:fixed;" | |||
|+ Subjunctive & Conditional active | |||
! style="width:25%;" | Person | |||
! style="width:25%;" | Subj. Pres. | |||
! style="width:25%;" | Subj. Imp. | |||
! style="width:25%;" | Cond. Pres. | |||
|- | |||
! ec | |||
| abbia || avessi || avrebbi | |||
|- | |||
! þú | |||
| abbia || avessi || avresti | |||
|- | |||
! e | |||
| abbia || avesse || avrebbe | |||
|- | |||
! ve | |||
| abbii || avessi || avrebbi | |||
|- | |||
! gio | |||
| abbiaze || avessize || avreze | |||
|- | |||
! vi | |||
| abbiamu || avessimu || avremmu | |||
|- | |||
! giu | |||
| abbiate || avessite || avrete | |||
|- | |||
! i | |||
| abbiano || avessino || avrebberono | |||
|} | |||
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center; width:30%; table-layout:fixed;" | |||
|+ Subjunctive passive | |||
! style="width:50%;" | Person | |||
! style="width:50%;" | Present | |||
|- | |||
! ec | |||
| abbiruo | |||
|- | |||
! þú | |||
| abbisuo | |||
|- | |||
! e | |||
| abbiþuo | |||
|- | |||
! ve | |||
| abbinduo | |||
|- | |||
! gio | |||
| abbinduo | |||
|- | |||
! vi | |||
| abbinduo | |||
|- | |||
! giu | |||
| abbinduo | |||
|- | |||
! i | |||
| abbinduo | |||
|} | |||
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center; width:30%; table-layout:fixed;" | |||
|+ Imperative | |||
! style="width:34%;" | Person | |||
! style="width:33%;" | Affirmative | |||
! style="width:33%;" | Negative | |||
|- | |||
! þú | |||
| ave || non avere | |||
|- | |||
! gio | |||
| aveze || non avere | |||
|- | |||
! giu | |||
| avete || non avere | |||
|} | |||
===Adverbs=== | |||
Adverbs in Luthic are generally categorised into three main types based on their formation: | |||
* Inherited irregular adverbs: a number of adverbs are directly inherited from Latin and Gothic. These forms are often irregular and do not follow a productive pattern. Examples include: | |||
:: ondar “under”, èr “early”, sí “so”, sva “thus”, contra “against.” | |||
* Adverbs in -e: a large class of regular adverbs is formed by attaching the suffix -e, a feature inherited from Latin, for instance: | |||
:: fregionde “friendly”, rette “right.” | |||
* Adverbs in -mente: following a pattern common to most Romance languages, another class of regular adverbs is formed by attaching the suffix -mente to the feminine form of an adjective, e.g.: | |||
:: fragcamente “frankly”, angiamente “finally.” | |||
===Prepositions=== | |||
Prepositions are used to specify the relationship between nouns, pronouns, and other parts of a sentence, particularly in spatial, temporal, or logical contexts. In many instances where a preposition might be used, Luthic employs a specific noun case instead. However, prepositions are used for clarity and to express nuances that cases alone cannot convey. Most prepositions govern a specific case, meaning the noun that follows must be inflected accordingly. | |||
* Accusative: usually denote movement towards something, specially a destiny or a target. Examples include: | |||
:: for “for”, þèr “through”, contra “against.” | |||
* Dative: typically indicate static location, accompaniment, instrument, or beneficiary. Such as: | |||
:: meþ “with”, fra “from”, neva “near.” | |||
* Genitive: typically those expressing a position relative to a boundary such as ‘beyond’ and ‘outside’. For instance: | |||
:: endana “beyond”, ovaro “over (moving across)”, otana “outside.” | |||
A special class of locational prepositions, particularly those expressing in ‘in’, ana ‘on; at’, can govern two different cases. The choice of case is determined by the semantic distinction between motion and static location. | |||
These prepositions govern the accusative case when expressing motion towards a destination (answering the question “where to?”). | |||
They govern the dative case when expressing a static, unchanging location (answering the question “where at?”). | |||
* (motion, accusative) gaggo neþana staþe. → I go into the place. | |||
* (location, dative) bio neþamma staþi. → I am in the place. | |||
The preposition ‘in’ is subject to sandhi, where its final nasal consonant assimilates to the place of articulation of the following sound. This results in four allomorphs, which are reflected in the orthography: | |||
* im is used before labial consonants (e.g., p, b, v, f); | |||
* ig (pronounced [iŋ]) is used before velar consonants (e.g., c, g); | |||
* in is used before any vowel or any dental consonant (e.g. t, d); | |||
* i is used before sonorants, such as m, n, r and l. | |||
A key feature is the mandatory contraction of certain prepositions with the definite article that follows them. These articulated prepositions merge the two words into a single form. The resulting form depends on the specific preposition and the gender, number, and case of the article. | |||
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center; width:50%; table-layout:fixed;" | |||
|+ Prepositional articles | |||
! style="width:14%;" | | |||
! style="width:14%;" | m.sg. | |||
! style="width:14%;" | f.sg. | |||
! style="width:14%;" | n.sg. | |||
! style="width:14%;" | m.pl. | |||
! style="width:14%;" | f.pl. | |||
! style="width:14%;" | n.pl. | |||
|- | |||
! a | |||
| aþþana || aþþa || aþþata || aþþe || aþþi || aþþa | |||
|- | |||
! di | |||
| deþana || deþa || deþata || deþe || deþi || deþa | |||
|- | |||
! du | |||
| doþamma || doþamma || doþamma || doþe || doþe || doþe | |||
|- | |||
! for | |||
| foþþana || foþþa || foþþata || foþþe || foþþi || foþþa | |||
|- | |||
! fra (acc.) | |||
| fraþana || fraþa || fraþata || fraþe || fraþi || fraþa | |||
|- | |||
! fra (dat.) | |||
| fraþamma || fraþamma || fraþamma || fraþe || fraþe || fraþe | |||
|- | |||
! in (acc.) | |||
| neþana || neþa || neþata || neþe || neþi || neþa | |||
|- | |||
! in (dat.) | |||
| neþamma || neþamma || neþamma || neþe || neþe || neþe | |||
|- | |||
! ana (acc.) | |||
| naþana || naþa || naþata || naþe || naþi || naþa | |||
|- | |||
! ana (dat.) | |||
| naþamma || naþamma || naþamma || naþe || naþe || naþe | |||
|- | |||
! meþ | |||
| meþþamma || meþþamma || meþþamma || meþþe || meþþe || meþþe | |||
|} | |||
===Conjunctions=== | |||
Conjunctions are invariable words that link other words, phrases, or clauses. Luthic distinguishes between two main classes of conjunctions: coordinating and subordinating, based on the grammatical relationship they establish between the elements they connect. | |||
Coordinating conjunctions connect grammatically equal elements. Luthic possesses a nuanced system where the choice of conjunction often depends on the context of polarity (affirmative vs. negative) and contrast. | |||
* gio and -vu (and): the primary conjunction for simple addition is gio. For contexts involving a binary contrast, Luthic employs the enclitic suffix -vu, which attaches to the second element to link it with the first, often carrying a slightly adversative nuance. | |||
* eþ, aþþa, ac and òc (but): the choice of the adversative conjunction depends on the polarity of the first clause. “Ac” is used after a negative statement to introduce a correction or a mutually exclusive alternative. “Òc” is used after an affirmative statement to introduce a simple contrast. “Eþ, aþþa” are used when the clause (usually the first) is adversative and/or there is no polarity before. | |||
* eþþuo and neþþa (or/nor): for alternatives, eþþuo is the general conjunction ‘or’ used in affirmative contexts. In negative contexts, neþþa is used to link negated alternatives. | |||
* þuo (than): it is used in comparisons, to introduce the basis of the comparison, usually seeking to measure the force of an adjective or similar description between two predicates. | |||
Subordinating conjunctions introduce a dependent (or subordinate) clause and connect it to an independent (main) clause. They establish a specific relationship between the clauses, such as time, cause, or condition. Many of these conjunctions, particularly those introducing clauses of purpose, condition, or other non-factual events, require the verb of the subordinate clause to be in the subjunctive mood. Subordinating conjunctions can be grouped by their function: | |||
* Complementiser: í is used to introduce a noun clause that functions as the subject or object of a verb. This form is identical to the relative pronoun í. | |||
* Conditional: the conditional conjunction is giavè “if”. Unreal or hypothetical conditions require the subjunctive mood. | |||
* Causal: the causal conjunctions are þande “because, since” and svi “as”, which introduces a clause that provides the reason or cause for the action in the main clause. | |||
* Temporal: van “when” and mentre “while” introduce temporal clauses; van specifies the point in time of an action, while mentre is used to indicate a simultaneous, ongoing action. | |||
* Purpose: the primary conjunction of purpose is forvo “so that, in order that”, which introduces a clause stating the goal of the main action. The verb in a purpose clause is typically in the subjunctive mood, as it expresses a desired, non-factual outcome. | |||
* Concessive: sibbiene “although, though” introduces a clause that presents an obstacle or a counter-argument to the main clause. The following verb is always in the subjunctive mood. | |||
===Numerals=== | |||
Luthic distinguishes between cardinal numerals (answering ‘how many?’) and ordinal numerals (answering ‘which in order?’). | |||
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center; width:30%; table-layout:fixed;" | |||
|+ Cardinals | |||
! style="width:30%;" | # | |||
! style="width:70%;" | Form | |||
|- | |||
! 1 | |||
| ienu, iena, ieno | |||
|- | |||
! 2 | |||
| tue, tui, tua | |||
|- | |||
! 3 | |||
| þrei, þrei, þregia | |||
|- | |||
! 4 | |||
| feddor | |||
|- | |||
! 5 | |||
| fife | |||
|- | |||
! 6 | |||
| sè | |||
|- | |||
! 7 | |||
| siu | |||
|- | |||
! 8 | |||
| attuo | |||
|- | |||
! 9 | |||
| niu | |||
|- | |||
! 10 | |||
| ziu | |||
|} | |||
The Luthic word for 0 is zephero, a regular Class 3 neuter noun. While ienu, iena and ieno follows a regular Class 1, 2 & 3 declension, tui, tue, tua and þrei have irregular plurale tantum paradigms. Other numbers are indeclinable. | |||
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center; width:30%; table-layout:fixed;" | |||
|+ tue | |||
! style="width:25%;" | Case | |||
! style="width:25%;" | m. | |||
! style="width:25%;" | f. | |||
! style="width:25%;" | n. | |||
|- | |||
! nom. | |||
| tue || tui || tua | |||
|- | |||
! gen. | |||
| tuaggi || tuaggio || tuaggi | |||
|- | |||
! acc. | |||
| tue || tui || tua | |||
|- | |||
! dat. | |||
| tue || tue || tue | |||
|} | |||
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center; width:30%; table-layout:fixed;" | |||
|+ 11–19 | |||
! style="width:30%;" | # | |||
! style="width:70%;" | Form | |||
|- | |||
! 11 | |||
| ellefe | |||
|- | |||
! 12 | |||
| tuolefe | |||
|- | |||
! 13 | |||
| þriziu | |||
|- | |||
! 14 | |||
| feddorziu | |||
|- | |||
! 15 | |||
| fifeziu | |||
|- | |||
! 16 | |||
| seziu | |||
|- | |||
! 17 | |||
| siuziu | |||
|- | |||
! 18 | |||
| attoziu | |||
|- | |||
! 19 | |||
| niuziu | |||
|} | |||
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center; width:30%; table-layout:fixed;" | |||
|+ Tens | |||
! style="width:30%;" | # | |||
! style="width:70%;" | Form | |||
|- | |||
! 20 | |||
| venta | |||
|- | |||
! 30 | |||
| þrinta | |||
|- | |||
! 40 | |||
| feddoranta | |||
|- | |||
! 50 | |||
| fifanta | |||
|- | |||
! 60 | |||
| sessanta | |||
|- | |||
! 70 | |||
| siunta | |||
|- | |||
! 80 | |||
| attanta | |||
|- | |||
! 90 | |||
| niunta | |||
|- | |||
! 100 | |||
| ondo | |||
|} | |||
Combinations of a decade and a unit are constructed in a regular way: the decade comes first followed by the unit. No spaces are written between them. Vowel collision triggers an interpunct. For example: | |||
* 28 venta·attuo; | |||
* 73 siuntaþrei; | |||
* 81 attanta·ienu. | |||
The numeral ondo (100) functions as a regular Class 3 neuter noun. Because it is a noun itself, it does not agree in gender with the noun it quantifies. The higher hundreds are pluralia tantum formed by compounding the base numeral with -(o)nda, the plural form of ondo. | |||
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center; width:30%; table-layout:fixed;" | |||
|+ 200–1000 | |||
! style="width:30%;" | # | |||
! style="width:70%;" | Form | |||
|- | |||
! 200 | |||
| tuonda | |||
|- | |||
! 300 | |||
| þrionda | |||
|- | |||
! 400 | |||
| feddoronda | |||
|- | |||
! 500 | |||
| fifonda | |||
|- | |||
! 600 | |||
| seonda | |||
|- | |||
! 700 | |||
| siunda | |||
|- | |||
! 800 | |||
| attonda | |||
|- | |||
! 900 | |||
| niunda | |||
|- | |||
! 1000 | |||
| mille | |||
|} | |||
Combinations of a hundred and a lower number are expressed by just placing them together, with the hundred coming first: | |||
* 111 ondo·elfe; | |||
* 164 ondosessantafeddor; | |||
* 788 siunda·attanta·attuo. | |||
Mille is a regular Class 4 noun. Combinations of a thousand and a lower number are expressed by placing them together, with the thousand coming first. A space is written between them: | |||
* 1 066 mille sessantasè; | |||
* 9 011 niumilli ellefe; | |||
* 61 500 sessanta·ienomilli fifonda; | |||
* 123 456 ondoventaþreimilli feddorondafifantasè. | |||
For numerals of one million (millione Class 4) and above (milliarde Class 4), Luthic employs the long scale system, common throughout continental Europe. | |||
* millione: 10⁶ (one million); | |||
* milliarde: 10⁹ (one thousand million); | |||
* billione: 10¹² (one million million); | |||
* billiarde: 10¹⁵ (one thousand million million). | |||
Luthic’s ordinals, besides a few irregular suppleted forms, use the suffix -þo or -to before fricatives (Class 1n). The historic cluster -fto resulted in -tto. | |||
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center; width:30%; table-layout:fixed;" | |||
|+ 1st–10th | |||
! style="width:30%;" | # | |||
! style="width:70%;" | Form | |||
|- | |||
! 1st | |||
| fromo (Class 1n) | |||
|- | |||
! 2nd | |||
| aþaru | |||
|- | |||
! 3rd | |||
| þriþo | |||
|- | |||
! 4th | |||
| fedorþo | |||
|- | |||
! 5th | |||
| fitto | |||
|- | |||
! 6th | |||
| sesto | |||
|- | |||
! 7th | |||
| siuþo | |||
|- | |||
! 8th | |||
| attuþo | |||
|- | |||
! 9th | |||
| niuþo | |||
|- | |||
! 10th | |||
| ziuþo | |||
|} | |||
Ordinals agree in gender, acting as Class 1, 2 & 3 adjectives. Zephero becomes zepheroþo. | |||
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center; width:30%; table-layout:fixed;" | |||
|+ 11th–1000th | |||
! style="width:30%;" | # | |||
! style="width:70%;" | Form | |||
|- | |||
! 11th | |||
| elletto | |||
|- | |||
! 12th | |||
| tuoletto | |||
|- | |||
! 13th | |||
| þriziuþo | |||
|- | |||
! 14th | |||
| feddorziuþo | |||
|- | |||
! 15th | |||
| fifeziuþo | |||
|- | |||
! 16th | |||
| seziuþo | |||
|- | |||
! 17th | |||
| siuziuþo | |||
|- | |||
! 18th | |||
| attoziuþo | |||
|- | |||
! 19th | |||
| niuziuþo | |||
|- | |||
! 20th | |||
| ventaþo | |||
|- | |||
! 30th | |||
| þrintaþo | |||
|- | |||
! 40th | |||
| feddorantaþo | |||
|- | |||
! 50th | |||
| fifantaþo | |||
|- | |||
! 60th | |||
| sessantaþo | |||
|- | |||
! 70th | |||
| siuntaþo | |||
|- | |||
! 80th | |||
| attantaþo | |||
|- | |||
! 90th | |||
| niuntaþo | |||
|- | |||
! 100th | |||
| ondoþo | |||
|- | |||
! 200th | |||
| tuondaþo | |||
|- | |||
! 300th | |||
| þriondaþo | |||
|- | |||
! 400th | |||
| feddorondaþo | |||
|- | |||
! 500th | |||
| fifondaþo | |||
|- | |||
! 600th | |||
| seondaþo | |||
|- | |||
! 700th | |||
| siundaþo | |||
|- | |||
! 800th | |||
| attondaþo | |||
|- | |||
! 900th | |||
| niundaþo | |||
|- | |||
! 1000th | |||
| milleþo | |||
|} | |||
Multiple numbers only take the suffix in the last element: | |||
* 123 ondoventaþriþo; | |||
* 2011 tuemilli elletto. | |||
Bigger numbers follow the same logic: | |||
* millionth millioneþo; | |||
* billionth milliardeþo. | |||
===Syntax=== | |||
The fundamental principle of clause structure is the Verb-Second (V2) word order. This rule dictates that in any declarative main clause, the finite (conjugated) verb must always appear in the second position. The first position is occupied by the sentence’s topic, which can be the subject or another element (such as an adverb or object) moved to the front for emphasis. When a non-subject element occupies the first position, the subject must be inverted and placed after the verb. | |||
: dregco þata vato. | |||
: dregc-o þata vat-o | |||
: drink-1SG the water | |||
: “I drink the water.” | |||
: þata vato dregco. | |||
: þata vat-o dregc-o | |||
: the water drink-1SG | |||
: “The water is what I drink.” | |||
: bii liuvalicu. | |||
: bi-i liuv-a-lic-u | |||
: be-2SG adorable | |||
: “You are adorable.” | |||
: liuvalicu bii | |||
: liuv-a-lic-u bi-i | |||
: adorable be-2SG | |||
: “Adorable is what you are.” | |||
In contrast, subordinate clauses (introduced by conjunctions like í, ei, si, or þande) follow a strict Verb-Final (VF) word order, where the finite verb is placed at the very end of the clause. | |||
: galuovo í, betese sarebbe si eta | |||
: ga=luov-o í betes-e sar-ebb-e si eta | |||
: think-1SG that better be-COND.3SG if it | |||
: crai togissimu. | |||
: crai tog-iss-imu | |||
: tomorrow do-SUBJ.IMPF.1PL | |||
: “I think that it would be better if we did it tomorrow.” | |||
Yes/no questions and direct commands use a Verb-First (V1) word order. Questions with an interrogative pronoun (e.g., vata) maintain the V2 structure, with the interrogative pronoun in the first position. | |||
: gai þú snele? | |||
: ga-i þú snel-e | |||
: walk-2SG you fast | |||
: “Do you walk fast?” | |||
: togi þú svasvi qeþo! | |||
: tog-i þú svasvi qeþ-o | |||
: do-IMP.2SG you as say-1SG | |||
: “Do as I say!” | |||
: vata togi þú? | |||
: vata tog-i þú | |||
: what do-2SG you | |||
: “What are you doing?” | |||
Non-finite verb forms (infinitives, participles) and separable verb particles are placed at the end of the main clause. | |||
: Sa mina fregionda è aþþa festa anaqemando. | |||
: s-a min-a fregi-ond-a è aþ=þa festa ana=qem-and-o | |||
: the my friend is to=the party on=come-GER | |||
: “My friend is arriving (oncoming) at the party.” | |||
: sa mina fregionda qemò aþþa festa ana. | |||
: s-a min-a fregi-ond-a qem-ò aþ=þa fest-a ana | |||
: the my friend came to=the party on | |||
: “My friend arrived (came on) at the party.” | |||
As a rule, the subject pronoun is omitted unless it is expressed for emphasis, clusivity or clarity. Double emphasis can be used. | |||
: snele bii þú. | |||
: snel-e bi-i þú | |||
: fast be-2SG you | |||
: “Fast is what you really are.” | |||
====Case usage==== | |||
The primary function of the accusative case is to mark the direct object of a transitive verb, indicating the patient or receiver of the action. In addition to this role, the accusative is used in a variety of adverbial contexts, often without a governing preposition. These functions include expressing: | |||
* Extent of space: qervò þri chilometri. “He walked three kilometres” | |||
* Duration of time: non bidò ieno dago. “He didn’t wait for one day” | |||
* Place when: þana staþe. “In/on this place” | |||
:* Sometimes prepositional: neþþana staþe. “id.” | |||
* Time when: gieno ventru. “In/at/during that winter” | |||
* Within which: licchie ore schia svoltare. “Within a few hours he shall die” | |||
A preposition is typically required for these temporal and locative uses only when the accusative form of the noun is identical to its nominative form (i.e., with feminine, neuter, and all plural nouns) in order to avoid ambiguity. | |||
The main function of the dative case is to mark the indirect object of a verb, typically indicating the recipient, beneficiary, or the entity affected by the action. Beyond this core role, the dative has a wide range of adverbial and instrumental functions. It is used to express: | |||
* Purpose: manne non obbia, òc goþa toginda. “Humans are not made for evil, but for good” | |||
* Action for: þu schio elpare þi fregionde þine. “I must help your friends for you” | |||
* Purpose for action for: qeno nasini bio. “I am the (cause of) salvation for women” | |||
* Action against: þamma þina fregiatada schio duoþare þuc. “Against/in opposition to your freedom I shall kill you” | |||
* Purpose for action against: manne duoþa bio. “I am the (cause of) death for men” (affects negatively) | |||
* Concerning: vata þú me schia togire? “What will you do for me (expressing the speaker being especially interested in what the other is doing for him or her)?” | |||
* Instrument: screvo penna. “I write with a pen” | |||
* Means: sevo uogona. “I see with the eyes” | |||
* Impersonal agent: gaduoþaþa coltella velvi. “He was killed by the knife of the robber” | |||
* Manner: fregio þuc manage fregiaþþe. “I love you with many affection” | |||
:* Prepositional if with no adjective: fregio þuc meþ fregiaþþe. “I love you with affection” | |||
* Accompaniment: schio qemare fregionda. “I shall come with friends” | |||
* Sometimes prepositional: schio qemare meþ fregionda. “id.” | |||
* Degree of difference: alþeso iena giera. “He is older by a few years” | |||
* Quality: ienu vieru summa onestada. “A man of highest honesty” | |||
* Separation: schio copire þan’ovelo þu. “I shall keep the evil away from you” | |||
* Motion away (prepositional): giupa Ravenna du America furondo. “They went from Ravenna to America” | |||
*- Comparison (adjectival): qeno scuonesa. “More beautiful than women” | |||
* Cause: greto ira gio agi. “I cry with anger and fear” (marks the reason) | |||
The dative also serves a special grammatical function as the impersonal agent in passive constructions, where it marks an inanimate tool or force. | |||
The genitive case primarily expresses possession. However, its functions extend to several other important relational and descriptive roles: | |||
* Material: sa celecna stieni. “The tower made of stone” | |||
* Author/creator or personal agent: sa celecna togiþa andevi mino. “This tower was built by my hands” | |||
* Behaviour: molle vati. “Soft like water” | |||
:* Often displaced by the relative adverb: molle svasvi vato. “Soft like water” | |||
==Research== | |||
Luthic is a well-documented language, supported by numerous academic departments in Italy devoted either specifically to Luthic or to linguistics more broadly, many of which maintain active research programs on the language. Ravenna serves as a major center of study, particularly through institutions such as the Linguistic Circle of Ravenna (Luthic: Crizzo Rasdavetascapetico Ravenne; Italian: Circolo Linguistico di Ravenna) at Ravenna University. A wide range of lexicographical and technological resources has been developed to support Luthic studies, and the language council Gaforþe folla Rasda Lúthica regularly publishes research at both national and international levels. Scholarly descriptions of the language appear in Luthic, Italian, and English, reflecting the interdisciplinary and multilingual character of current research. The most comprehensive grammar to date is Grammatica le Lúthice Rasde (“Grammar of the Luthic Language”) by Alessandru Fiscar and Luca Vagnar, written entirely in Luthic and spanning more than 600 pages. Several corpora are also available, including the Luthic Online Dictionary Project, which offers a curated lexicon of over 35,000 entries. | |||
The Ravenna School of Linguistics emerged around Giuvanni Laggobardi and his evolving theory of language within the framework of structuralist linguistics. Together with Sognafreþu Rossi, Laggobardi founded the Circle of Linguistics of Ravenna in 1964, modeled after the Prague Linguistic Circle. Beginning in 1970, Ravenna University introduced courses in languages and philosophy; however, students were required to complete their final examinations at the Accademia della Crusca in order to graduate. | |||
In 1990, the Ravenna University Circle of Phonological Development (Luthic: Crizzo Sviluppi Phonologici Ieniversitadi Ravenna) was established, though research on the earliest stages of Luthic phonological history remains limited. A decade later, in 2000, the Ravenna University Circle of Theology (Luthic: Crizzo Thiulogie Ieniversitadi Ravenna) was founded in collaboration with the Ravenna Cathedral, officially the Metropolitan Cathedral of the Resurrection of Our Lord Jesus Christ (Luthic: Cathedrale metropolitana deþe Ostassi Nostri Signori Giesuo Christi; Italian: Cattedrale metropolitana della Risurrezione di Nostro Signore Gesù Cristo; commonly referred to as the Duomo di Ravenna). | |||
===Phonological development=== | |||
Research on the earliest stages of phonological development in Luthic has focused on how infants acquire the ability to organize sounds into meaningful linguistic units. Phonological development refers here to the gradual process by which children, during early growth and language acquisition, establish a phoneme inventory and internalize the phonotactic constraints of the language. | |||
* Phoneme inventory and phonotactics | |||
In the initial stages of word production, word-final consonants are rarely realised; consonants occur primarily in word-initial or intervocalic positions. By around six months of age, infants show sensitivity to the prosodic features of the ambient language, which allows them to segment continuous speech into meaningful units. At this stage, they are also able to distinguish stressed from unstressed syllables, reflecting an emerging awareness of the rhythmic and intonational properties of spoken Luthic. | |||
* Around 10 months | |||
Most consonants occur only in word-initial position, notably the voiced stops /d/ and /b/ and the nasal /m/. Voiceless stops /t/, /p/, and, less frequently, /k/ are also attested, sometimes functioning as allophones. A clear preference for front places of articulation is observed. Clicks may occur, primarily in the context of imitative behaviors (e.g., suckling, raspberries). Babbling becomes more structured, shifting from earlier vocal play to canonical reduplicated babbling (CVCV). Consonant clusters remain absent. First words usually emerge around 12 months, commonly in a CVCV format, such as mama (“mother”), papa (“father”), and dada (“give me!”). | |||
* 21 months | |||
The phonetic inventory expands to include the nasal /n/, the voiceless affricate /t͡ʃ/ (an allophone of /t ~ d/, since voicing is not yet contrastive), and the liquid /l/. The preference for anterior articulation persists, often resulting in palatalisation. | |||
* 24 months | |||
Additional fricatives appear, including /f ~ v/ and /s/, which may undergo palatalisation to /ʃ/, typically in intervocalic positions. Voicing begins to function as a contrastive feature. Onomatopoeic expressions become increasingly common (e.g., /aw aw/ for dog barking, /ow/ or more typically /aj/ for pain). Trisyllabic words emerge, generally following a C₁VC₂VC₃V pattern. Consonant clusters are now attested and frequently show consonant harmony (e.g., -mb-, -nd-, -dr-), although voiced–voiceless clusters such as -mp- and -tr- remain rare. | |||
* 30 months | |||
At this stage, children produce approximately equal numbers of phones in both word-initial and intervocalic positions. The voiced stop /ɡ/ and additional consonant clusters are introduced. Coarticulated segments, including labio-velar plosives, begin to occur. Alveolar and bilabial articulations dominate, while labiodental and postalveolar usage increases and velar production declines. Luthic-specific lenition processes become evident, characterised by a rise in fricatives and approximants. Children display greater awareness of syllabic segmentation than of phonemic segmentation. | |||
* Word processes | |||
These phonological processes may happen within a range of 3 to 6 years. | |||
: Nasal assimilation: Non-nasal segments assimilate to a neighboring nasal (e.g., [ˈrɛn.dɐ] → [ˈnen.nɐ]). | |||
: Weak syllable deletion: Unstressed syllables, particularly in initial or final positions, are omitted (e.g., [bɐˈnaː.nɐ] → [ˈna.nɐ]). | |||
: Coda deletion: Final consonants or codas are omitted (e.g., [vɐr] → [vɐ]; [ˈbroː.dɐr] → [ˈbro.dɐ] or [ˈbro]). | |||
: Consonant harmony: One consonant assimilates to another within the word (e.g., [vɐn] → [vɐɱ]; [ˈstɛk.kɐ] → [ˈstɛt.tɐ]). | |||
: Coalescence: Adjacent consonants merge into one with shared features (e.g., [ˈzbaf.fu] → [ˈvaf.fu], realised as [ˈva.fu]). | |||
: Cluster reduction: Consonant clusters are simplified (e.g., [oˈrek̟.k̟jɐ] → [oˈrej.jɐ] or [ˈre.jɐ]). | |||
: Velar fronting: Velar plosives are replaced with alveolars before front vowels (e.g., [ki] → [ti] or [t͡ʃi]). | |||
: Stopping or affrication: Fricatives are replaced by stops or affricates near front vowels (e.g., [si] → [ti] or [t͡ʃi]). | |||
: Gliding: Liquids and taps are replaced by glides (e.g., [ˈkaː.ru] → [ˈka.wu]; [ˈaʎ.ʎo] → [ˈaj.jo]). | |||
* 6 years | |||
By this stage, children typically command an adult-like phonemic inventory. Their ability to produce complex phonotactic sequences and multisyllabic lexical items is largely established, though refinement continues throughout middle childhood. | |||
==Typology== | |||
Luthic has right symmetry, as do other VO languages (verb before object) like English. | |||
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:left; width:75%; table-layout:fixed;" | |||
|+ Typological correlations | |||
! style="width:40%;" | Correlation | |||
! style="width:30%;" | VO language | |||
! style="width:30%;" | Examples | |||
|- | |||
! Adposition type | |||
| prepositions | |||
| of..., than..., on... | |||
|- | |||
! Order of noun and genitive | |||
| noun before genitive | |||
| father + of John | |||
|- | |||
! Order of adjective and standard of comparison | |||
| adjective before standard | |||
| taller + than Bob | |||
|- | |||
! Order of verb and adpositional phrase | |||
| verb before adpositional phrase | |||
| slept + on the floor | |||
|- | |||
! Order of verb and manner adverb | |||
| verb before manner adverb | |||
| ran + slowly | |||
|- | |||
! Order of copula and predicative | |||
| copula before predicate | |||
| is + a teacher | |||
|- | |||
! Order of auxiliary verb and content verb | |||
| auxiliary before content verb | |||
| want + to see Mary | |||
|- | |||
! Place of adverbial subordinator in clause | |||
| clause-initial subordinators | |||
| because + Bob has left | |||
|- | |||
! Order of noun and relative clause | |||
| noun before relative clause | |||
| movies + that we saw | |||
|} | |||
==Sample text== | |||
: Sacavano so vendu norde þata sòilo·vu, vaiu so forteso vá, van ienu pellegrinu, þamma acchia varma avviluppatu, anaqemò. | |||
: sac-av-ano so vend-u nord-e þata sòil-o=vu vai-u so fort-es-o vá van ien-u pellegrin-u þamma acchi-a varm-a avvilupp-at-u ana-qem-ò. | |||
: dispute-IPFV-3PL DEF.NOM.M.SG wind-NOM.SG north-NOM.SG DEF.NOM.N.SG sun-NOM.SG=CONJ which-NOM.SG DEF.NOM.M.SG strong-CMPR-NOM.M.SG be.PST.3SG when INDF.NOM.M.SG traveler-NOM.SG. DEF.DAT.M.SG cloak-DAT.SG warm-DAT.SG wrap-PTCP-NOM.M.SG on-come-PRF.3SG. | |||
: Disputed the North Wind the Sun-and, which the stronger was, when a traveler, (in) the cloak warm wrapped, arrived. | |||
: Sammirano i í, vaiu fromo þan’acchio þe pellegrini rimuovere magassi, so forteso þamm’aþera duomitu sarebbe. | |||
: samm-irano i í vai-u from-o þan=acchi-o þe pellegrin-i rimuov-ere mag-ass-i so fort-es-o þamm=aþer-a duom-it-u sar-ebbe. | |||
: agree-PRF.3PL 3PL.NOM COMP REL-NOM.SG. first-ADV DEF.ACC.M.SG=cloak-ACC.SG DEF.GEN.M.SG traveler-GEN.SG remove-INF able-IPFV.SBJV-3SG DEF.NOM.M.SG strong-CMPR-NOM.SG DEF.DAT.SG=other-DAT.SG judge-PTCP-NOM.M.SG be-COND.3SG. | |||
: Agreed they that, who first the cloak of-the traveler to-remove might/could, the stronger than-the other considered would-be. | |||
: Þan soffiò so vendu norde ardumente í, mageva, ac þan miese soffiava, þan miese servò so pellegrinu þan’acchio bi se. | |||
: Þan soffi-ò so vend-u nord-e ard-u-mente í mag-ev-a ac þan mies-e soffi-av-a þan mies-e serv-ò so pellegrin-u þan=acchi-o bi se. | |||
: then blow-PRF.3SG DEF.NOM.M.SG wind-NOM.SG north-NOM.SG hard-THM-ADV COMP able-IPFV-3SG but the more-ADV blow-IPFV-3SG the more-ADV fold-PRF.3SG DEF.NOM.M.SG traveler-NOM.SG DEF.ACC.M.SG=cloak-ACC.SG around REFL.DAT. | |||
: Then blew the wind north hard-ly as able-was, but the more blew, the more folded the traveler the=cloak around himself. | |||
: Gio angiamente aggevò so vendu norde þana sforzo. Þan scinò þata sòilo varmamente, gio immediatamente rimuové so pellegrinu þan’acchio. | |||
: Gio angi-a-mente aggev-ò so vend-u nord-e þana sforz-o þan scin-ò þata sòil-o varm-a-mente gio immediat-a-mente rimuov-é so pellegrin-u þan=acchi-o | |||
: and end-THM-ADV give.up-PRF.3SG DEF.NOM.M.SG wind-NOM.SG north-ADJ DEF.ACC.M.SG effort-ACC.SG then shine-PRF.3SG DEF.NOM.N.SG sun-NOM.SG warm-THM-ADV and immediate-THM-ADV remove-PRF.3SG DEF.NOM.M.SG traveler-NOM.SG DEF.ACC.M.SG=cloak-ACC.SG | |||
: And finally gave-up the wind north the effort. Then shone the sun warm-ly, and immediately removed the traveler the=cloak. | |||
: Sva obbligatu fú so vendu norde ad andetare í, þata sòilo so forteso tuaggi vá. | |||
: Sva obblig-at-u fú so vend-u nord-e ad andet-are í þata sòil-o so fort-es-o tu-aggi vá. | |||
: thus oblige-PTCP-NOM.M.SG be.PRF.3SG DEF.NOM.M.SG wind-NOM.SG north-ADJ to confess-INF COMP DEF.NOM.N.SG sun-NOM.SG DEF.NOM.M.SG strong-CMPR-NOM.SG two-GEN.PL be.PST.3SG | |||
: Thus obliged was the wind north to confess that, the sun the stronger of-two was. | |||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||