Vėtuhapamarėska: Difference between revisions
Updated infobox |
|||
| (3 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|image= POMORZE_XII-copy.png | |image= POMORZE_XII-copy.png | ||
|imagesize= 250px | |imagesize= 250px | ||
|name= | |name= Old Pomorian | ||
|nativename= | |nativename=Vėtuhapamarėska gålba | ||
|pronunciation= | |pronunciation=ˈʋeː.tʊ.ɦɑ.pɑ.ˈma:.reː.skɑ | ||
|creator=User:Raistas | |||
|creator= | |setting=''[[Verse:Pamarija|Parallel World]]'' | ||
|setting=''Parallel World'' | |||
<!--|speakers= | <!--|speakers= | ||
<nowiki>|</nowiki> <big>Vėtuhapamarėska gålba</big> | <nowiki>|</nowiki> <big>Vėtuhapamarėska gålba</big> | ||
|date=--> | |date=--> | ||
|familycolor=Indo-European | |familycolor=Indo-European | ||
|ancestor=[[w:Proto-Indo-European language|Proto-Indo-European]] | |ancestor=[[w:Proto-Indo-European language|Proto-Indo-European]] | ||
|ancestor2=[[w:Proto-Balto-Slavic language|Proto-Balto-Slavic]] | |ancestor2=[[w:Proto-Balto-Slavic language|Proto-Balto-Slavic]] | ||
|ancestor3=[[w:History of Proto-Slavic#Pre-Slavic|Early Proto-Slavic]] | |ancestor3=[[w:History of Proto-Slavic#Pre-Slavic|Early Proto-Slavic]] | ||
| | |script1=Latn | ||
|notice=IPA | |notice=IPA | ||
}} | }} | ||
| Line 483: | Line 479: | ||
|- | |- | ||
! 1st | ! 1st | ||
| *- | | *-ām, *-ū 1 || -wā || -emas/-eme | ||
|- | |- | ||
! 2nd | ! 2nd | ||
| - | | -esēi/-ēi || -tā || -ete | ||
|- | |- | ||
! 3rd | ! 3rd | ||
| -eti || - | | -eti || -tes || -anti | ||
|- | |- | ||
! colspan=4| Athematic | ! colspan=4| Athematic | ||
| Line 497: | Line 493: | ||
|- | |- | ||
! 1st | ! 1st | ||
| *-mì || -wā́ || - | | *-mì || -wā́ || -màs | ||
|- | |- | ||
! 2nd | ! 2nd | ||
| - | | -sēi || -tā́ || -tè | ||
|- | |- | ||
! 3rd | ! 3rd | ||
| -ti || - | | -ti || -tes || -ànti | ||
|} | |} | ||
| | | | ||
| Line 514: | Line 510: | ||
|- | |- | ||
! 1st | ! 1st | ||
| - | | -an/-un || -wai || -āme | ||
|- | |- | ||
! 2nd | ! 2nd | ||
| Line 520: | Line 516: | ||
|- | |- | ||
! 3rd | ! 3rd | ||
| - | | -e || -tes || -ēn | ||
|- | |- | ||
! colspan=4| Sigmatic | ! colspan=4| Sigmatic | ||
| Line 528: | Line 524: | ||
|- | |- | ||
! 1st | ! 1st | ||
| - | | -uhun || -hawai || -hāme | ||
|- | |- | ||
! 2nd | ! 2nd | ||
| Line 534: | Line 530: | ||
|- | |- | ||
! 3rd | ! 3rd | ||
| -hēs || - | | -hēs || -stes || -hēn | ||
|} | |} | ||
| | | | ||
| Line 545: | Line 541: | ||
|- | |- | ||
! 1st | ! 1st | ||
| *- | | *-sjām, *-sjū 1 || -siwā || -esimas | ||
|- | |- | ||
! 2nd | ! 2nd | ||
| Line 551: | Line 547: | ||
|- | |- | ||
! 3rd | ! 3rd | ||
| -siti || - | | -siti || -sites || -sjanti | ||
|- | |- | ||
!colspan=4| *(Continuous) 3 | !colspan=4| *(Continuous) 3 | ||
| Line 559: | Line 555: | ||
|- | |- | ||
! 1st | ! 1st | ||
| *- | | *-ensjū || -ensiwā || -ensjemas | ||
|- | |- | ||
! 2nd | ! 2nd | ||
| - | | -ensjēi/-ensēi || -ensitā || -ensjete | ||
|- | |- | ||
! 3rd | ! 3rd | ||
| -ensiti || - | | -ensiti || -ensites || -ensjanti | ||
|} | |} | ||
|} | |} | ||
'''Notes:''' | '''Notes:''' | ||
# Both endings could be reconstructed for 1st person singular in present tense. The former ending is from the Western dialects, the latter - from the Eastern ones. The Eastern form with an '''ū''' is expected from simple phonological development, while the Western ''' | # Both endings could be reconstructed for 1st person singular in present tense. The former ending is from the Western dialects, the latter - from the Eastern ones. The Eastern form with an '''ū''' is expected from simple phonological development, while the Western '''ām''' is explained by an innovation, shared with Slavic languages, however it doesn't mean that the change happened in early Proto-Slavic, otherwise there would be no differences in endings between the dialects. | ||
# According to the modern language the ''-ēis'' ending is reconstructible for 2nd person singular in past tense, but the form ''-ei'' was attested. However it is not precisely known whether the ''-ei(s)'' ending was real or it could be a misspelling. | # According to the modern language the ''-ēis'' ending is reconstructible for 2nd person singular in past tense, but the form ''-ei'' was attested. However it is not precisely known whether the ''-ei(s)'' ending was real or it could be a misspelling. | ||
# It is not know how exactly the ''en'' suffix functioned, it could indicate a process or duration of an action. It is not found anywhere except this tense. | # It is not know how exactly the ''en'' suffix functioned, it could indicate a process or duration of an action. It is not found anywhere except this tense. | ||
| Line 594: | Line 590: | ||
* *ā and *ō > *ā, a change shared with Proto-Slavic and West Baltic (in unstressed positions only). | * *ā and *ō > *ā, a change shared with Proto-Slavic and West Baltic (in unstressed positions only). | ||
*-as > *-es (in Baltic remained as *-as, in Slavic changed into *-əs and then into *-ъ except Old Novgorodian, where it became -e) | *-as > *-es (in Baltic remained as *-as, in Slavic changed into *-əs and then into *-ъ except Old Novgorodian, where it became -e) | ||
* *š > *x | |||
* *ā > *ū before labial consonants, but was blocked due to an analogical leveling in ''-āti'' endings before labials and its conjugation. Similar change happened in Old Prussian. | * *ā > *ū before labial consonants, but was blocked due to an analogical leveling in ''-āti'' endings before labials and its conjugation. Similar change happened in Old Prussian. | ||