Verse:Irta/Fêrrith Michaelidh - Revision history

Praimhín: /* Influence */

2023-03-26T04:56:58Z

Influence

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:56, 26 March 2023
Line 13:		Line 13:
	...		...
	Sanskrit appealed to her because of its IE origin and Old Chinese because of its telegraphic syntax suggesting the state of humanity before the Fall of Adam. It's after her discovery of Old Chinese that she started sketching Rõktiap.		Sanskrit appealed to her because of its IE origin and Old Chinese because of its telegraphic syntax suggesting the state of humanity before the Fall of Adam. It's after her discovery of Old Chinese that she started sketching Rõktiap.

	~~==Influence==~~

	Michaelidh is known all over Irta for bridging the worlds of religion and linguistics. Catholics view Rõktiap as perhaps the only accurate analogy for the Trinity, which is no doubt responsible for the popularity of Michaelidh's work. Remonitionists, on the other hand, think of Michaelidh's work as a treasure trove of mystical and occult symbolism as well as paradoxes; major Remonitionist author and critic Jacob Wellwise cited Michaelidh's conlanging as a challenge to her belief in "the original language of humanity" by considering the possibility that societies could make up and pass on new languages that, like Rõktiap, were unrelated to the real original language. This controversy persists to this day in the way Irtan linguists look at pidgins and creoles; historically Remonitionist countries follow the theory that creoles are made ex nihilo and should be grouped into separate language families whereas Catholic countries follow the theory that creoles are descendants of their lexifiers, and the latter is known today in Irta as "the Latzial school of linguistics".

	Today, a majority of Irtan Remonitionists reject religious faith but accept the prevailing linguistic theories that arose from Michaelidh's work, which is the main way Remonitionists assert their religious identity. In addition, Michaelidh's translations of Old Chinese texts like the Tao Te Ching directly shaped Remonitionist thought.

Praimhín: /* Influence */

2023-03-12T11:34:56Z

Influence

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:34, 12 March 2023
Line 16:		Line 16:
	==Influence==		==Influence==

	Michaelidh is known all over Irta for bridging the worlds of religion and linguistics. Catholics view Rõktiap as perhaps the only accurate analogy for the Trinity, which is no doubt responsible for the popularity of Michaelidh's work. Remonitionists, on the other hand, think of Michaelidh's work as a treasure trove of mystical and occult symbolism as well as paradoxes; major Remonitionist author and critic ~~John~~ Wellwise cited Michaelidh's conlanging as a challenge to her belief in "the original language of humanity" by considering the possibility that societies could make up and pass on new languages that, like Rõktiap, were unrelated to the real original language. This controversy persists to this day in the way Irtan linguists look at pidgins and creoles; historically Remonitionist countries follow the theory that creoles are made ex nihilo and should be grouped into separate language families whereas Catholic countries follow the theory that creoles are descendants of their lexifiers, and the latter is known today in Irta as "the Latzial school of linguistics".		Michaelidh is known all over Irta for bridging the worlds of religion and linguistics. Catholics view Rõktiap as perhaps the only accurate analogy for the Trinity, which is no doubt responsible for the popularity of Michaelidh's work. Remonitionists, on the other hand, think of Michaelidh's work as a treasure trove of mystical and occult symbolism as well as paradoxes; major Remonitionist author and critic Jacob Wellwise cited Michaelidh's conlanging as a challenge to her belief in "the original language of humanity" by considering the possibility that societies could make up and pass on new languages that, like Rõktiap, were unrelated to the real original language. This controversy persists to this day in the way Irtan linguists look at pidgins and creoles; historically Remonitionist countries follow the theory that creoles are made ex nihilo and should be grouped into separate language families whereas Catholic countries follow the theory that creoles are descendants of their lexifiers, and the latter is known today in Irta as "the Latzial school of linguistics".

	Today, a majority of Irtan Remonitionists reject religious faith but accept the prevailing linguistic theories that arose from Michaelidh's work, which is the main way Remonitionists assert their religious identity. In addition, Michaelidh's translations of Old Chinese texts like the Tao Te Ching directly shaped Remonitionist thought.		Today, a majority of Irtan Remonitionists reject religious faith but accept the prevailing linguistic theories that arose from Michaelidh's work, which is the main way Remonitionists assert their religious identity. In addition, Michaelidh's translations of Old Chinese texts like the Tao Te Ching directly shaped Remonitionist thought.

Praimhín at 11:32, 12 March 2023

2023-03-12T11:32:01Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:32, 12 March 2023
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~Aeno~~ Michaelidh, a mystic and comparative linguist; the first conlanger in the Irtan Western world		Fêrrith Michaelidh, a mystic and comparative linguist; the first conlanger in the Irtan Western world
	**Influenced by her missionary work in Southeast Asia		**Influenced by her missionary work in Southeast Asia
	**Writes groundbreaking works in historical linguistics (equivalent to our timeline's William Jones) and proposes Proto-Indo-Uralic		**Writes groundbreaking works in historical linguistics (equivalent to our timeline's William Jones) and proposes Proto-Indo-Uralic
	***Unlike William Jones, Michaelidh is not surprised by Sanskrit's relation to Latin and Greek; she expects it and travels to Southeast Asia partly to verify her belief in a common ancestor for all human languages which was close to Church Latin and Koine Greek; she also discovers ancient Indo-Iranian loanwords in her native Medh Chêl		***Unlike William Jones, Michaelidh is not surprised by Sanskrit's relation to Latin and Greek; she expects it and travels to Southeast Asia partly to verify her belief in a common ancestor for all human languages which was close to Church Latin and Koine Greek; she also discovers ancient Indo-Iranian loanwords in her native Medh Chêl
	***She doesn't expect Old Chinese		***She doesn't expect Old Chinese
	**Latinizes her name, originally of [[Medh Chêl]] origin, to Aenō, Aenōnis

	==Linguistic philosophy==		==Linguistic philosophy==

Praimhín: Praimhín moved page Verse:Irta/Aeno Michaelidh to Verse:Irta/Fêrrith Michaelidh without leaving a redirect: Aino wasn't a real name before the Kalevala was written; Fêrrith is cognate with Beatrix

2023-03-12T11:31:36Z

Praimhín moved page Verse:Irta/Aeno Michaelidh to Verse:Irta/Fêrrith Michaelidh without leaving a redirect: Aino wasn't a real name before the Kalevala was written; Fêrrith is cognate with Beatrix

← Older revision	Revision as of 11:31, 12 March 2023
(No difference)

IlL: IlL moved page User:IlL/Verse:Irta/Aeno Michaelidh to Verse:Irta/Aeno Michaelidh without leaving a redirect

2022-12-19T03:56:51Z

IlL moved page User:IlL/Verse:Irta/Aeno Michaelidh to Verse:Irta/Aeno Michaelidh without leaving a redirect

← Older revision	Revision as of 03:56, 19 December 2022
(No difference)

IlL: IlL moved page Verse:Irta/Aeno Michaelidh to User:IlL/Verse:Irta/Aeno Michaelidh without leaving a redirect

2022-09-15T19:43:23Z

IlL moved page Verse:Irta/Aeno Michaelidh to User:IlL/Verse:Irta/Aeno Michaelidh without leaving a redirect

← Older revision	Revision as of 19:43, 15 September 2022
(No difference)

Praimhín at 10:52, 22 June 2022

2022-06-22T10:52:44Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:52, 22 June 2022
Line 19:		Line 19:
	Michaelidh is known all over Irta for bridging the worlds of religion and linguistics. Catholics view Rõktiap as perhaps the only accurate analogy for the Trinity, which is no doubt responsible for the popularity of Michaelidh's work. Remonitionists, on the other hand, think of Michaelidh's work as a treasure trove of mystical and occult symbolism as well as paradoxes; major Remonitionist author and critic John Wellwise cited Michaelidh's conlanging as a challenge to her belief in "the original language of humanity" by considering the possibility that societies could make up and pass on new languages that, like Rõktiap, were unrelated to the real original language. This controversy persists to this day in the way Irtan linguists look at pidgins and creoles; historically Remonitionist countries follow the theory that creoles are made ex nihilo and should be grouped into separate language families whereas Catholic countries follow the theory that creoles are descendants of their lexifiers, and the latter is known today in Irta as "the Latzial school of linguistics".		Michaelidh is known all over Irta for bridging the worlds of religion and linguistics. Catholics view Rõktiap as perhaps the only accurate analogy for the Trinity, which is no doubt responsible for the popularity of Michaelidh's work. Remonitionists, on the other hand, think of Michaelidh's work as a treasure trove of mystical and occult symbolism as well as paradoxes; major Remonitionist author and critic John Wellwise cited Michaelidh's conlanging as a challenge to her belief in "the original language of humanity" by considering the possibility that societies could make up and pass on new languages that, like Rõktiap, were unrelated to the real original language. This controversy persists to this day in the way Irtan linguists look at pidgins and creoles; historically Remonitionist countries follow the theory that creoles are made ex nihilo and should be grouped into separate language families whereas Catholic countries follow the theory that creoles are descendants of their lexifiers, and the latter is known today in Irta as "the Latzial school of linguistics".

	Today, a majority of Irtan Remonitionists reject religious faith but accept the prevailing linguistic theories that arose from Michaelidh's work, which is the main way Remonitionists assert their religious identity.		Today, a majority of Irtan Remonitionists reject religious faith but accept the prevailing linguistic theories that arose from Michaelidh's work, which is the main way Remonitionists assert their religious identity. In addition, Michaelidh's translations of Old Chinese texts like the Tao Te Ching directly shaped Remonitionist thought.

Praimhín at 10:51, 22 June 2022

2022-06-22T10:51:21Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:51, 22 June 2022
Line 3:		Line 3:
	**Writes groundbreaking works in historical linguistics (equivalent to our timeline's William Jones) and proposes Proto-Indo-Uralic		**Writes groundbreaking works in historical linguistics (equivalent to our timeline's William Jones) and proposes Proto-Indo-Uralic
	***Unlike William Jones, Michaelidh is not surprised by Sanskrit's relation to Latin and Greek; she expects it and travels to Southeast Asia partly to verify her belief in a common ancestor for all human languages which was close to Church Latin and Koine Greek; she also discovers ancient Indo-Iranian loanwords in her native Medh Chêl		***Unlike William Jones, Michaelidh is not surprised by Sanskrit's relation to Latin and Greek; she expects it and travels to Southeast Asia partly to verify her belief in a common ancestor for all human languages which was close to Church Latin and Koine Greek; she also discovers ancient Indo-Iranian loanwords in her native Medh Chêl
			***She doesn't expect Old Chinese
	**Latinizes her name, originally of [[Medh Chêl]] origin, to Aenō, Aenōnis		**Latinizes her name, originally of [[Medh Chêl]] origin, to Aenō, Aenōnis

Praimhín at 10:38, 22 June 2022

2022-06-22T10:38:48Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:38, 22 June 2022
Line 12:		Line 12:
	Her travels in Asia were a defining moment when she discovered two important classical languages: Sanskrit and Old Chinese.		Her travels in Asia were a defining moment when she discovered two important classical languages: Sanskrit and Old Chinese.
	...		...
	Sanskrit appealed to her because of its IE origin and Old Chinese because of its telegraphic syntax suggesting the state of humanity before the Fall of Adam.		Sanskrit appealed to her because of its IE origin and Old Chinese because of its telegraphic syntax suggesting the state of humanity before the Fall of Adam. It's after her discovery of Old Chinese that she started sketching Rõktiap.

	==Influence==		==Influence==

Praimhín at 10:37, 22 June 2022

2022-06-22T10:37:50Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:37, 22 June 2022
Line 9:		Line 9:

	Her first conlangs started as childhood play, but as she studied the Bible her conlanging efforts grew more serious. Her studies of IE morphology had a notable Christian bent to them -- for instance, she connected the early PIE animate and inanimate genders to the Father and the Holy Spirit, and the grammaticalization of the collective to the Son.		Her first conlangs started as childhood play, but as she studied the Bible her conlanging efforts grew more serious. Her studies of IE morphology had a notable Christian bent to them -- for instance, she connected the early PIE animate and inanimate genders to the Father and the Holy Spirit, and the grammaticalization of the collective to the Son.

			Her travels in Asia were a defining moment when she discovered two important classical languages: Sanskrit and Old Chinese.
			...
			Sanskrit appealed to her because of its IE origin and Old Chinese because of its telegraphic syntax suggesting the state of humanity before the Fall of Adam.

	==Influence==		==Influence==